This study examines the effectiveness of a contextualized intervention guided by the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES) in enhancing writing self-efficacy among English as a foreign language (EFL) undergraduates. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research involved 81 first-year students from a comprehensive university in Southeast China. Participants were divided into an experimental group (n = 41), which engaged in a SAWSES-based intervention incorporating reflective tasks, peer feedback, and process-oriented writing support, and a control group (n = 40), which received teacher-fronted, lecture-based, accuracy-focused instruction. Quantitative data from preintervention and postintervention surveys, supplemented by qualitative analysis of reflective journals, revealed significant gains in writing self-efficacy in both groups, with the experimental group demonstrating notably greater improvement. The intervention proved effective across different academic disciplines and gender groups, suggesting broad applicability at the undergraduate level. These findings highlight the value of structured reflection and contextualized support in fostering academic writing confidence. Implications for pedagogy and avenues for future research are discussed, with particular attention to cross-disciplinary applicability and varying educational levels.
AllaguiB. (2023). Examining the impact of the number of sources on students’ source-based writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 213.
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
3.
BanduraA. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.
4.
BanduraA. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.
5.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 604). Freeman.
BråtenI.HaverkampY.E.LatiniN.StrømsøH.I. (2023). Measuring multiple-source based academic writing self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1212567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212567
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
10.
BruningR.DempseyM.KauffmanD.F.McKimC.ZumbrunnS. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25.
11.
BruningR. H.KauffmanD. F. (2016). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 160–173). The Guilford Press.
ChengX.ZhangL.J.NeufeldT.J. (2025). Exploring L2 postgraduate students’ engagement with supervisor feedback in academic writing. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251343987
14.
CodeJ. (2020). Agency for learning: Intention, motivation, self-efficacy and self-regulation. Frontiers in Education, 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019
15.
CuiX.GardinerI.A. (2025). Investigating students’ academic language-related challenges and their interplay with English proficiency and self-efficacy on EMI success in Transnational Education (TNE) programs in China. English for Specific Purposes, 78, 53–69.
16.
DoenyasC.GülZ.T.AlcıB. (2023). A non-Western adaptation of the situated academic writing self-efficacy scale (SAWSES). Assessing Writing, 57, 100763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100763
17.
DongY.R. (1997). Supervising international students requires cultural sensitivity. Scientist, 11(19), 10.
18.
DoolanS.M. (2023). Source-based L1 student writing development: Analyzing the relationships among functional dimensions of source use and the quality of source use. Written Communication, 40(2), 720–753.
19.
FentawY.MogesB.T.IsmailS.M. (2022). Academic procrastination behavior among public university students. Education Research International, 2022(1), 1277866.
20.
FlowerdewJ.WangS.H. (2015). Identity in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 81–99.
21.
GolparvarS.E.KhafiA. (2021). The role of L2 writing self-efficacy in integrated writing strategy use and performance. Assessing Writing, 47, 100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100504
HanJ.HiverP. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44–59.
24.
HashemnejadF.ZoghiM.AminiD. (2014). The relationship between self-efficacy and writing performance across genders. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(5), 1045–1052.
25.
HayesJ. R. (2013). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In LevyC. M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Routledge.
26.
HuertaM.GoodsonP.BeigiM.ChlupD. (2017). Graduate students as academic writers: Writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881
27.
HylandK. (2004). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press.
28.
JefferiesD.McNallyS.RobertsK.WallaceA.StundenA.D’SouzaS.GlewP. (2018). The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 60, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.020
29.
JinS. (2024). Tapping into social media: transforming EFL learners’ writing skills and alleviating anxiety through YouTube. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 10707–10728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12252-z
30.
KakhS.Y.MansorW.F.A.W. (2014). Task-based writing instruction to enhance graduate students’ audience awareness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 206–213.
31.
KavanozS.YükselH.G. (2024). Developing and validating a self-efficacy scale for scholarly writing in English. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(2), 71–82.
32.
KuyyogsuyS. (2019). Promoting peer feedback in developing students’ English writing ability in L2 writing class. International Education Studies, 12(9), 76–90.
33.
LatifM.M.A. (2020). Writing motivation research, measurement and pedagogy. Routledge.
34.
LavelleE. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy for writing. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(1), 73–84.
35.
LentR.W.BrownS.D.HackettG. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36.
36.
LinnenbrinkE.A.PintrichP.R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs instudent engagement and learning intheclassroom. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
37.
MezaP.GonzálezM. (2020). Construction and validation of the self-efficacy scale for disciplinary academic writing. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1830464. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1830464
MitchellK.M.HarriganT.McMillanD.E. (2017). Writing self-efficacy in nursing students: The influence of a discipline-specific writing environment. Nursing Open, 4(4), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.90
40.
MitchellK.M.HarriganT.StefanssonT.SetlackH. (2017). Exploring self-efficacy and anxiety in first-year nursing students enrolled in a discipline-specific scholarly writing course. Quality Advancement in Nursing Education, 3(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1084
41.
MitchellK.M.McMillanD.E. (2018). A curriculum-wide assessment of writing self-efficacy in a baccalaureate nursing program. Nurse Education Today, 70, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.003
42.
MitchellK.M.McMillanD.E.LobchukM.M. (2019). Applying the “social turn” in writing scholarship to perspectives on writing self-efficacy. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15.
43.
MitchellK.M.McMillanD.E.LobchukM.M.NickelN.C.RabbaniR.LiJ. (2021). Development and validation of the situated academic writing self-efficacy scale (SAWSES). Assessing Writing, 48, 100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524
44.
MitchellK.M.RiegerK.L.McMillanD.E. (2017). A template analysis of writing self-efficacy measures. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 25(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.25.2.205
45.
PajaresF. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
46.
PajaresF.JohnsonM.J.UsherE.L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte20076485
47.
PajaresF.ValianteG. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In MacArthurC.A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 158–170). Guilford Press.
48.
PaltridgeB. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37(2), 87–105.
49.
ParéA. (2014). Rhetorical genre theory and academic literacy. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), A83–A94.
50.
PatzakA.ZhangX.VytasekJ. (2025). Boosting productivity and wellbeing through time management: Evidence-based strategies for higher education and workforce development. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1623228.
51.
PepinskyT. B. (2018). A note on listwise deletion versus multiple imputation. Political Analysis, 26(4), 480–488.
52.
PinielK.CsizérK. (2015). Changes in motivation, anxiety and self-efficacy during the course of an academic writing seminar. Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning, 81, 164–194. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-015
53.
RussellD.LeaM.ParkerJ.StreetB.DonahueT., et al (2009). Exploring notions of genre in academic literacies and writing across the curriculum: Approaches across countries and contexts. In BazermanC. (Ed.), Genre in a changing world: Perspectives on writing (pp. 459–491). WAC Clearinghouse.
54.
SchunkD. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172.
55.
SeloniL. (2018). Identity, voice, and the second language writer. In LiontasJ. I. (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
56.
SchmidtK.M.AlexanderJ.E. (2012). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writerly self-efficacy in writing centers. Journal of Writing Assessment, 5(1), 62.
57.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Academic Press.
58.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2010). Self-efficacy beliefs. In PetersonP.BakerE.McGawB. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 668–672). Elsevier.
59.
SchunkD.H.SwartzC.W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1024
60.
SchunkD.H.ZimmermanB.J. (2007). Influencing children’s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560600837578
61.
SuY.LiangJ.C.ZhengC.TsaiC.C. (2023). Co-regulation strategies and their associations with writing self-efficacy in a computer-mediated collaborative writing setting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, 100972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100972
62.
SumarsonoA.Y.P.MbatoC.L. (2021). Undergraduate students’ self-efficacy strategies in writing academic papers. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 16(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v16i1.29476
63.
SunQ.YangZ.JiangL. (2024). Effect of an EAP course on students’ writing performance, anxiety and self-efficacy: A latent profile analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 933–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00909-3
64.
SunT.WangC. (2020). College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. System, 90, 102221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102221
65.
SunT.WangC.LambertR.G.LiuL. (2021). Relationship between second language English writing self-efficacy and achievement: A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100817
66.
TengL.S.PeigianP.S.XuL. (2018). Conceptualizing writing self-efficacy in English as a foreign language contexts: Scale validation through structural equation modeling. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 911–942. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.432
67.
TengM.F.QinC.WangC. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4
68.
TengM.F.WangC. (2023). Assessing academic writing self-efficacy belief and writing performance in a foreign language context. Foreign Language Annals, 56(1), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12638
69.
TengM.F.ZhanY. (2023). Assessing self-regulated writing strategies, self-efficacy, task complexity, and performance in English academic writing. Assessing Writing, 57, 100728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100728
70.
UrdanT.PajaresF. (Eds.). (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. IAP.
71.
Van BlankensteinF.M.SaabN.Van der RijstR.M.DanelM.S.Bakker-van den BergA.S.Van den BroekP.W. (2019). How do self-efficacy beliefs for academic writing and collaboration and intrinsic motivation for academic writing and research develop during an undergraduate research project?. Educational Studies, 45(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1446326
72.
VincentC.Tremblay-WraggÉ.DériC.PlanteI.Mathieu ChartierS. (2023). How writing retreats represent an ideal opportunity to enhance PhD candidates’ writing self-efficacy and self-regulation. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1600–1619. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1918661
73.
WischgollA. (2016). Combined training of one cognitive and one metacognitive strategy improves academic writing skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00187
WorthingtonM.SalamonsonY.WeaverR.ClearyM. (2013). Predictive validity of the Macleod Clark professional identity scale for undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33, 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.012
76.
ZhangJ.ZhangL.J. (2024). Profiling L2 students’ writing self-efficacy and its relationship with their writing strategies for self-regulated learning. System, 122, 103253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103253
77.
ZhangY. (2018). Exploring EFL learners’ self-efficacy in academic writing based on process-genre approach. English Language Teaching, 11(6), 115–124.
78.
ZimmermanB.J.BanduraA. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
