Students of English as a foreign language (EFL) are often found to have weak control over authorial stance for constructing persuasive argumentation in academic writing. However, little interventional research has been reported on improving students’ stance-taking, particularly the patterning of stance resources. To fill the gap, we conducted this quasi-experimental study to explore the effects of the systemic functional linguistics (SFL) Engagement system as a pedagogical affordance on improving EFL students’ stance-taking with a pre- and post-test design. Forty-six Chinese EFL undergraduate students were randomly assigned either to a treatment group or a comparison group. The treatment group was provided with a seven-week intervention which included explicit instruction in stance-taking, while the comparison group received regular writing instruction that did not involve the teacher teaching stance-taking explicitly to students. Upon completion of the intervention, we conducted qualitative analysis of stance patterns and found across-group differences. Students in the treatment group were more capable of establishing argumentation through an alternation of contractive and expansive stances. The stance patterns for introducing external sources further indicate their enhanced undertaking of authorial responsibility and better incorporation of sources. However, both groups kept using unspecified sources in stance attributions. We conclude our study with a discussion of pedagogical implications.
AullL.L.LancasterZ. (2020). STANCE AS STYLE: Toward a Framework for Analyzing Academic Language. In ButlerP.RayB.VanguriS.M. (Eds.), Style and the Future of Composition Studies (pp. 98–113). Utah State University Press.
2.
AullL.L.BandarageD.MillerM.R. (2017). Generality in student and expert epistemic stance: A corpus analysis of first-year, upper-level, and published academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 29–41.
3.
BakhtinM.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Edited by HolquistM.; translated by EmersonC.HolquistM.University of Texas Press.
ChangP.C. (2012). Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: A textlinguistic approach. ReCALL, 24, 209–236.
6.
ChangP.C. (2016). EFL doctoral students’ conceptions of authorial stance in academic research writing: An exploratory study. RELC Journal, 47, 175–192.
7.
ChangP.C.SchleppegrellM. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 140–151.
8.
ChangP.C.SchleppegrellM. (2016). Explicit learning of authorial stance-taking by L2 doctoral students. Journal of Writing Research, 8, 49–80.
9.
CharlesM. (2006). Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.003
10.
ChenC.ZhangJ. (2017). An intercultural analysis of the use of hedging by Chinese and Anglophone academic English writers. Applied Linguistics Review, 8, 1–34.
11.
ChengF.-W.UnsworthL. (2016). Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 43–57.
12.
CoffinC.HewingsA.NorthS. (2012). Arguing as an academic purpose: The role of asynchronous conferencing in supporting argumentative dialogue in school and university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 38–51.
13.
CrosthwaiteP.JiangF.K. (2017). Does EAP affect written L2 academic stance? A longitudinal learner corpus study. System, 69, 92–107.
14.
CrosthwaiteP.CheungL.JiangF.K. (2017). Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 107–123.
15.
GalbraithD. (2009) Writing as discovery. In ConnellyV.BarnettA.L.DockrellJ.E.TolmieA. (Eds.), Teaching and learning writing. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 6. British Psychological Society, pp. 5–26.
16.
HallidayM.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
17.
HoodS. (2006). The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 37–49.
18.
HumphreyS.MacNaughtL. (2016). Functional language instruction and the writing growth of English language learners in the middle years. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 792–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.247
19.
HuntK. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research report No. 3. NCTE.
20.
HylandK. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173–192.
21.
HylandK. (2012). Undergraduate understandings: Stance and voice in final year reports. In HylandK.Sancho GuindaC. (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 134–150). Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
HylandK. (2016). Writing with attitude: Conveying a stance in academic texts. In HinkelE. (Ed.), Teaching English grammar to speakers of other languages (pp. 246–265). Routledge.
23.
HylandK.JiangF.K. (2016). ‘We must conclude that . . .’: A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 29–42.
24.
JouY. (2019). Scaffolding L2 writers’ metacognitive awareness of voice in article reviews: A case study of SFL-based pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 100770.
25.
KwonM.H.StaplesS.PartridgeR.S. (2018). Source work in the first-year L2 writing classroom: Undergraduate L2 writers’ use of reporting verbs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 86–96.
26.
LancasterZ. (2014). Exploring valued patterns of stance in upper-level student writing in the disciplines. Written Communication, 31, 27–57.
27.
LancasterZ. (2016a). Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 16–30.
28.
LancasterZ. (2016b). Using corpus results to guide the discourse-based interview: A study of one student’s awareness of stance in academic writing in philosophy. Journal of Writing Research, 8, 119–148.
29.
LeeJ.J.DeakinL. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21–34.
30.
LeeJ.J.HitchcockC.Elliott CasalJ. (2018). Citation practices of L2 university students in first-year writing: Form, function, and stance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 1–11.
31.
LeeS.H. (2008). An integrative framework for the analyses of argumentative/persuasive essays from an interpersonal perspective. Text and Talk, 28, 239–270.
32.
LeeS.H. (2010). Command strategies for balancing respect and authority in undergraduate expository essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 61–75.
33.
LiardétC.L.BlackS. (2019). ‘So and so’ says, states and argues: A corpus-assisted engagement analysis of reporting verbs. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 37–50.
34.
LoghmaniZ.GhonsoolyB.GhazanfariM. (2020). Engagement in doctoral dissertation discussion sections written by English native speakers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100851.
35.
LoiC.K.LimJ.M.H.WhartonS. (2016). Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1–16.
36.
MartinJ.R.RoseD. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.
37.
MartinJ.R.WhiteP.R.R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
MillerR.T.MitchellT.D.PessoaS. (2014). Valued voices: Students’ use of engagement in argumentative history writing. Linguistics and Education, 28, 107–120.
39.
MooreJ.SchleppegrellM. (2014). Using a functional linguistics metalanguage to support academic language development in the English Language Arts. Linguistics and Education, 26, 92–105.
40.
MuC.ZhangL.J.EhrichJ.HongH. (2015). The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 135–148.
41.
NorrisJ.M.OrtegaL. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
42.
PetrićB. (2012). Legitimate textual borrowing: Direct quotation in L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 102–117.
43.
Ryshina-PankovaM. (2014). Exploring academic argumentation in course-related blogs through ENGAGEMENT. In ThompsonG.Alba-JuezL. (Eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 281–302). John Benjamins.
44.
SawakiT. (2014). On the function of stance-neutral formulations: Apparent neutrality as a powerful stance constructing resource. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 81–92.
45.
SchmidtR.W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
46.
StaplesS.ReppenR. (2016). Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
47.
StockI.Eik-NesN.L. (2016). Voice features in academic texts – A review of empirical studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.006
48.
TengL.S. (2021). Individual differences in self-regulated learning: Exploring the nexus of motivational beliefs, self-efficacy, and SRL strategies in EFL writing. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 16April2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211006881.
49.
Walsh MarrJ. (2019). Making the mechanics of paraphrasing more explicit through Grammatical Metaphor. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100783
50.
WetteR. (2010). Evaluating student learning in a university-level EAP unit on writing using sources. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(3), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.06.002
51.
WetteR. (2018). Source-based writing in a health sciences essay: Year 1 students’ perceptions, abilities and strategies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 61–75.
52.
WhiteP.R.R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259–284.
53.
WhiteP.R. (2020). The language of attitude, arguability and interpersonal positioning: The appraisal website. Available at: http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal (accessed March 2023).
54.
WingateU. (2012). ‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 145–154.
55.
WuS.M. (2007). The use of engagement resources in high- and low-rated undergraduate geography essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 254–271.
56.
XieJ. (2016). Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 1–15.
57.
XiongS.ZouW. (2011). Developing Chinese undergraduate English-majors’ research article writing competence. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34, 5–25.
58.
XuL.ZhangL.J. (2019). L2 doctoral students’ experiences in thesis writing in an English-medium university in New Zealand. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 100779.
59.
YoonH.J.RömerU. (2020). Quantifying disciplinary voices: An automated approach to interactional metadiscourse in successful student writing. Written Communication, 37, 208–244.
60.
ZhangL.ZhangL.J. (2021a). Development and validation of the questionnaire on EFL students’ perceptions of authorial stance in academic writing. Applied Linguistics Review. Epub ahead of print 1 November 2021. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2021-0003
61.
ZhangL.ZhangL.J. (2021b). Fostering stance-taking as a sustainable goal in developing EFL students’ academic writing skills: Exploring the effects of explicit instruction on academic writing skills and stance deployment. Sustainability, 13, 4270.
62.
ZhangL.J. (2013). Second language writing as and for second language learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 446–447.
63.
ZhangL.J. (2016). Reflections on the pedagogical imports of western practices for professionalizing ESL/EFL writing and writing-teacher education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 203–232.
64.
ZhangT.T.ZhangL.J. (2021). Taking stock of a genre-based pedagogy: Sustaining the development of EFL students’ knowledge of the elements in argumentation and writing improvement. Sustainability, 13, 11616.
65.
ZhaoC.G. (2012). Measuring authorial voice strength in L2 argumentative writing: The development and validation of an analytic rubric. Language Testing, 30(2), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212456965
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
