Joint-degree language programs for future business and health professionals: student perspective

Abstract

To contribute to the discourse on ways to revitalize world language education, this study explored, through the lens of program evaluation, the effect of academic and nonacademic relationships on language majors’ choice of their major, their other motivations, and the nature of career-related knowledge and experiences they value. To this end, the study used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, including a web-based survey (N = 80) and group interviews (n = 12). Participants were undergraduate students enrolled in a modern language program and joint-degree programs in language + business and language + health. Analysis revealed statistically significant differences among the three groups of students in the influence of college professors on their major choice, the reasons for choosing their major, and the types of desired workplace knowledge. Findings provide insights into how program curricula can be better aligned with the evolving demands of a globalized workplace.

Keywords

Joint-degree program program evaluation interdisciplinary language program language and business language and health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2019). Making languages our business: Addressing foreign language demand among U.S. employers. https://www.actfl.org/uploads/files/general/MakingLanguagesOurBusiness_FullReport.pdf

Amorati

Quaglieri

(2024). Commonplace or exotic? A comparative mixed-methods study on the instrumental work-related motivations of EFL and LOTE students. The Language Learning Journal, 52(2), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2023.2249009

Armengot

(2023). Language programs at Rochester Institute of Technology: A successful recent initiative (2018-present). In Uebel

E.H.

Kronenberg

F.A.

Sterling

(Eds.), Language program vitality in the United States: From surviving to thriving in higher education (pp. 307–311). Springer.

Baldry

Märtsin

Eivers

(2018). Traveling without a destination? A dialogical analysis of professional identity construction among Australian double degree psychology students. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 18(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2018.1447483

Braun

Clarke

(2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Chang

(2006). Globalization and English in Chinese higher education. World Englishes, 25(3–4), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2006.00484.x

Cinaglia

(2023). University students’ beliefs about the language requirement: Policy as articulated and as perceived. In Uebel

E.H.

Kronenberg

F.A.

Sterling

(Eds.), Language program vitality in the United States: From surviving to thriving in higher education (pp. 141–157). Springer.

Comizio

Fields

K.C.

(2024, June 27). What you need to know about becoming a health science major. U. S. News. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/health-science-major-overview

Commission on Language Learning. (2017). America’s languages: Investing in language education for the 21st century. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. https://www.amacad.org/publication/americas-languages

10.

Creswell

J.W.

Creswell

(2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

11.

Creswell

J.W.

Plano Clark

V.L.

(2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

12.

Crum

Kivik

(2023). Motivational factors affecting language student enrollment and retention in higher education. In Uebel

E.H.

Kronenberg

F.A.

Sterling

(Eds.), Language program vitality in the United States: From surviving to thriving in higher education (pp. 109–126). Springer.

13.

Czerkawski

Berti

(2020). Language learning in the 21st century: Current status and future directions. In Dupuy

Grosbois

(Eds.), Language learning and professionalization in higher education: Pathways to preparing learners and teachers in/for the 21st century (pp. 11–35). Research-publishing.net.

14.

Del Rossi

A.F.

Hersch

. (2016). The private and social benefits of double majors. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(2), 292–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2016.14

15.

Di Pietro

. (2022). International internships and skill development: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), e3363. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3363

16.

Ekkens

Winke

(2009). Evaluating workplace English language programs. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(4), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300903063038

17.

Enkin

Correa

(2018). Evaluating learner and teacher perceptions of program outcomes in the foreign language major. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 15(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.56040/ekmc1515

18.

Fischer

(2023, November 15). It’s a bleak climate for foreign languages as enrollments tumble. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/its-a-bleak-climate-for-foreign-languages-as-enrollments-tumble

19.

Kang

H. S.

(2013). Korean American college students’ language practices and identity positioning: “Not Korean, but not American”. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 12(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2013.818473

20.

Kang

H.S.

(2024). Learners’ beliefs about English language learning: The case of Korean college students sojourning in the US. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 9(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.22008.kan

21.

Kang

H. S.

Kim

I. S.

(2012). Perceived and actual competence and ethnic identity in heritage language learning: A case of Korean-American college students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.626846

22.

Kang

H.S.

Pacheco

M.B.

(2025). Engagement with language in study abroad: Accounts from Korean English-major students in the United States. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 46(1), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2356621

23.

Kiely

Rea-Dickins

(2005). Program evaluation in language education. Springer.

24.

King

S.C.

Torres

S.E.

(Eds.). (1989). Proceedings of the Clemson Conference on Language and International Trade. Clemson University.

25.

Lepetit

Cichocki

(2002). Teaching languages to future health professionals: A needs assessment study. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00156

26.

Lim

W. M.

(2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

27.

Long

M.K.

Uscinski

(2012). Evolution of languages for specific purposes programs in the United States: 1990–2011. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01303.x

28.

Looney

Lusin

(2019). Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, summer 2016 and fall 2016: Final report. Modern Language Association of America. https://www.mla.org/content/download/110154/2406932/2016-Enrollments-Final-Report.pdf

29.

Lusin

Peterson

Sulewski

Zafer

(2023). Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, fall 2021. Modern Language Association. https://www.mla.org/content/download/191324/file/Enrollments-in-Languages-Other-Than-English-in-US-Institutions-of-Higher-Education-Fall-2021.pdf

30.

Martinez

Sanz

(2008). Instructors’ and administrators’ beliefs within a Spanish LSP program. In Siskin

H.J.

(Ed.), From thought to action: Exploring beliefs and outcomes in the foreign language program (pp. 67–91). Heinle Cengage.

31.

Morgan

W.J.

Thompson

A.S.

(2023). “My friend Travis says. . .”: A look at enrollment trends in language classrooms in the United States. Foreign Language Annals, 56(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12683

32.

Murphy

Magnan

S.S.

Back

Garrett-Rucks

(2009). Reasons students take courses in less commonly taught and more commonly taught languages. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 7, 41–70.

33.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2023). Table 322.10-Bachelor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by field of study: Selected academic years, 1970–71 through 2021–22. Digest of Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_322.10.asp

34.

Naylor

Dollinger

Mahat

Khawaja

(2021). Students as customers versus as active agents: Conceptualizing the student role in governance and quality assurance. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 1026–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1792850

35.

Norris

J.M.

(2006). The why (and how) of assessing student foreign language programs. Modern Language Journal, 90, 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00466_2.x

36.

Norris

J.M.

(2016). Language program evaluation. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12307

37.

Oakes

(2013). Foreign language learning in a ‘monoglot culture’: Motivational variables amongst students of French and Spanish at an English university. System, 41(1), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.019

38.

Oyama

Kang

H.S.

(2024). Discourse-based grammar instruction in ESL academic writing: A mixed methods study. Language Awareness, 33(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2163495

39.

Pineda

(2024). Double the degree, double the identity? Identification and experiences of students studying two simultaneous degrees. International Journal of Educational Research, 125, 102346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102346

40.

Riazi

A.M.

Candlin

C.N.

(2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000505

41.

Ross

S.J.

(2009). Language program evaluation. In Long

Doughty

(Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 756–778). Wiley.

42.

Rubio

(2023). A revamped major: Reimagining the role of languages at a business university. In Uebel

E.H.

Kronenberg

F.A.

Sterling

(Eds.), Language program vitality in the United States: From surviving to thriving in higher education (pp. 237–240). Springer.

43.

Russell

A.W.

Dolnicar

Ayoub

(2008). Double degrees: Double the trouble or twice the return?. Higher Education, 55, 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9076-2

44.

Simonsen

(2022). How to maximize language learners’ career readiness. Language Teaching, 55, 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000227

45.

Siridetkoon

Dewaele

(2018). Ideal self and ought-to self of simultaneous learners of multiple foreign languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(4), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1293063

46.

Suarez

J. I.

(1993, December 27–30). The language and international trade program at Clemson University [Paper presentation]. Modem Languages Association Convention, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

47.

Tang

(2019). Against smallness: How successful language programs reimagine the Humanities. Profession. https://profession.mla.org/against-smallness-how-successful-language-programs-reimagine-the-humanities/

48.

Tavares

Melo-Pfeifer

(2025). The Palgrave handbook of internationalization of language education. Palgrave Macmillan.

49.

Thompson

A.S.

Vásquez

(2015). Exploring motivational profiles through language learning narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12187

50.

Van Gorp

Uebel

E.H.

Kronenberg

F.A.

Murphy

. (2024). How important is studying languages for undergraduate students and why (not) study languages? Foreign Language Annals, 57, 900–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12783

51.

Xie

(2014). L2 self of beginning-level heritage and nonheritage postsecondary learners of Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 47(1), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12074

52.

Zipser

(1992). Building a full-service foreign language department: Some strategies and interdisciplinary initiatives. ADFL Bulletin, 23(3), 28–33.