A utilization-focused evaluation (Patton, 2008) was conducted to systematically investigate special education teacher candidates’ preparation to teach English language learners (ELLs) with disabilities. The results were used to (1) determine current effectiveness of departmental programs and (2) guide program improvement efforts. The initial literature review on ELLs with disabilities and teacher preparation guided the development of a four element framework to organize and analyse the data and results of the program evaluation. Data were collected using (1) a document review of program materials, (2) a faculty questionnaire, (3) a faculty focus group, and (4) a survey of the teacher candidates’ knowledge and perceptions on their preparedness in this area. Data revealed a scattered and disjointed approach to preparing preservice teachers to teach ELLs with disabilities, leading to a lack of special education teacher candidate’s: (1) mastery of essential content and (2) sense of efficacy in teaching ELLs. This investigation also shed light on the range of faculty perspectives, knowledge, and practices in the preparation of special education teacher candidates to teach ELLs.
AbediJ. (2006). Psychometric issues in the ELL assessment and special education eligibility. Teachers College Record, 108, 2282–2303.
2.
ArtilesA.J.KlingnerJ.K. (2006). Forging a knowledge base on English language learners with special needs: Theoretical, population, and technical issues. Teachers College Record, 108, 2187–2194.
BarreraM.LiuK.ThurlowM.ChamberlainS. (2006). Use of chunking and questioning aloud to improve the reading comprehension of English language learners with disabilities (ELLs with Disabilities Report 17). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
5.
BingimlasK.HanrahanM. (2010). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and their practice: How the literature can inform science education reformers and researchers. In: TasarM.F.CakmakciG., (Eds.), Contemporary Science Education Research: International perspectives (pp.415–422). Ankara: Pegem.
6.
BorgS. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language Teachers’ think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
7.
CheathamG.A.BarnettJEH. (2016). Overcoming common misunderstandings about students with disabilities who are English language learners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(1).
De JongE. (2013). Preparing mainstream teachers for multilingual classrooms. Association of Mexican–American Educators (AMAE) Special Invited Issue, 7, 40–49.
11.
DeMatthewsD.E.EdwardsD.B.NelsonT.E. (2014). Identification problems: US special education eligibility for English language learners. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 27–34.
12.
DuranR.P. (2008). Assessing English language learners’ achievements. Review of Research in Education, 32, 292–327.
13.
HamannE.T.ReevesJ. (2013). Interrupting the professional schism that allows less successful educational practices with ELLs to persist. Theory Into Practice, 52, 81–88.
14.
HamayanE.MarlerB.Sánchez-LópezC.DamicoJ. (2013). Special education considerations for English language learners: Delivering a continuum of services. 2nd edition.Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.
15.
HendersonC.BeachA.FinkelsteinN. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 952–984.
16.
Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110–315, § 205.
17.
JordanA.StanovichP. (2003). Teachers’ personal epistemological beliefs about students with disabilities as indicators of effective teaching practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3.
18.
KarabenickS.A.Clemens NodaP.A. (2004). Professional development implications of teachers’ belief and attitudes toward English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 28, 55–75.
19.
KimJ. (2011). Relationships among and between ELL status, demographic characteristics, enrollment history, and school persistence (CRESST Report 810). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
20.
KimW.G.GarciaS.B. (2014). Long-term English language learners’ perceptions of their language and academic learning experiences. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 300–312.
21.
McGranerK.L.SaenzL. (2009). TQ connection issue paper on improving student outcomes in general and special education: Preparing teachers of English language learners. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Available at: http://www.tqsource.org/pdfs/PreparingTeachersofELLsprelim%20ed.pdf (accessed September 2017).
22.
MoreC.M.SpiesT.G.MorganJ.J.BakerJ.N. (2016). Incorporating English language learner instruction within special education teacher preparation. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51, 1–9.
OrtizA.A.RobertsonP.M.WilkinsonC.Y.LiuY.McGheeB.D.KushnerM.I. (2011). The role of bilingual education teachers in preventing inappropriate referrals of ELLS to special education: Implications for response to intervention. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 316–333.
25.
PanequeO.M.BarbettaP.M. (2006). A study of teacher efficacy of special education teachers of English language learners with disabilities. Bilingual Research Journal, 30, 171–193.
ReevesJ.R. (2006). Secondary teacher attitudes toward including English-language learners in mainstream classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 131–142.
SernaC.MeierN. (2010). Preparing pre-service teachers to work with English language learners. Proceedings of the 2010 Hawaii International Conference on Education, USA, 2758–2781. Available at: http://www.nicholasmeier.com/Articles/ELLpaper-HICEProceedings.pdf (September2017).
30.
SullivanA. (2011). Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners. Exceptional Children, 77, 317–334.
WhittenbergT. (2011). Language Barrier: Overcoming obstacles for English language learners in North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Justice Center.
33.
YoungJ.W.ChoY.LingG.ClineF.SteinbergJ.StoneE. (2008). Validity and fairness of state standards-based assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 13, 170–192.
