This study explores the effectiveness of modified Kazakh literary texts in teaching Kazakhs as foreign languages. Using a quasi-experimental design, 36 university students were divided into two groups: teacher-modified texts were provided to the experimental group and the control group used the original versions. The experimental group showed markedly greater improvements in reading speed and test results. A quarter of the experimental group participants reported experiencing greater motivation toward reading and forming daily reading habits, which was not observed in the control group. The graded readers were rated as having suitable difficulty by 33.3% of the experimental group, whereas 38.9% of the control group found the original text too difficult. The results indicate that there is a need for a uniform process to create graded readers for minority languages such as Kazakhs. This study focuses specifically on second-language learners in Kazakhs and does not include first-language speakers.
AlowaisA. (2021). The effects of leveled reading on second language learners. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(4), 1281–1299. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2447
2.
AmanzholN.AmanovaA.KerimbekovaB.ZholmakhanovaA.SarmurzinY. (2024). “My expectation did not meet reality”: Challenges of undergraduate students in English-medium instruction in Kazakhstan. Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2023-0062
3.
AndersonN. (1983). Rapid reading in the ESL classroom. Seventeenth Annual TESOL Conference, Toronto, Canada.
4.
AvetisyanE.KarapetyanI. (2023). Fiction text as a means of forming learners’ sociocultural competence. Wisdom, 25(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v25i1.964
5.
BakerJ.R. (2015). Achieving reading rate increases with low level ELLs in an extensive 199 reading environment using Anderson’s rate build up procedure. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 19(1), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.29650/TCUJHSS
6.
ChangA.C.-S. (2012). Improving reading rate activities for EFL students: Timed reading and repeated oral reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 56–83.
7.
ChangA.C.-S.PangJ.C.-L. (2020). Doing narrow reading through graded readers: Possibilities and difficulties. Extensive Reading World Congress Proceedings, Taichung, Taiwan, pp. 206–218.
8.
ChouM.H. (2022). Using literature circles to teach graded readers in English: An investigation into reading performance and strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1885412
9.
ClaridgeG. (2012). Graded readers: How the publishers make the grade. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66668
10.
Committee for Technical Regulation and Metrology. (2023). ST RK 1929–2023 communicative language competences for proficiency in the Kazakh language. Intermediate level. General proficiency. Ministry of Trade and Integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan. https://prg-online-web.prgapp.kz/document/?doc_id=33337462&pos=0;71
11.
CrossleyS.A.AllenD.B.Danielle McNamaraJ.S. (2011). Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 84–101.
12.
DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (2009). Motivation, Language identity and the L2 self. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(6), 741–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903488309
FiermanW. (1998). Language and identity in Kazakhstan: Formulations in policy documents 1987–1997. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(98)00005-1
16.
Gillis-FurutakaA. (2015). Graded reader readability: Some overlooked aspects. Journal of Extensive Reading, 3(1), 1–19.
GorsuchG.TaguchiE.UmeharaH. (2015). Repeated reading for Japanese language learners: Effects on reading speed, comprehension, and comprehension strategies. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 15, 18–44.
HashemiS. (2025). Evaluating the readability of Oxford bookworms short stories: An analysis of readability scores, grade alignment and text measurements. Linnaeus University. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-134430
HossainK.I. (2024). Literature-based language learning: Challenges, and opportunities for English learners. Ampersand, 13, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMPER.2024.100201
23.
JennerJ.JebakumarN. (2023). Enhancing language skills through English novel instruction. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(6), 498–502. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2023.4.6.498-502
24.
KaraB. (2019). The effect of graded readers on reading comprehension skill of EFL students. Language Teaching and Educational Research, 2(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.35207/LATER.554716
25.
KarymkhanA.A.MambetovaM.K.KulakhmetovaM.S. (2023). The importance of using adapted texts in teaching a foreign language. Bulletin of Toraighyrov University. Philology Series, 3, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.48081/CSPX2939
26.
Kazakhstan Educational Research Association. (2020). The code of ethics for educational researchers in Kazakhstan (1st ed.). Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Education.
KramschC. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
29.
KrashenS.D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Elsevier Science & Technology.
30.
KuperC.MatuszewskiJ.BanaszkiewiczA.ukasz BolaŁ.ł SzczepanikM.ł gorzata DrapsM.ł aw KordosP.SzwedM.JednorógK.MarchewkaA. (2021). Functional reorganization of the reading network in the course of foreign language acquisition. NeuroImage, 226, 117544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117544
31.
KuzhabekovaA. (2019). Language use among secondary school students in Kazakhstan original research. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2019.29964
32.
LatifiM.KetabiS.MohammadiE. (2013). The comprehension hypothesis today: An interview with Stephen Krashen. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(2), 221–233.
MacFarlandT.W.YatesJ.M. (2016). Mann–Whitney U Test. In MacFarland, T.W. & J.M. Yates (Eds.), Introduction to nonparametric statistics for the biological sciences using R (pp. 103–132). Springer.
35.
MambetovaM.K.KarymkhanA.A.AbdikadyrovaA.K. (2024). Adapting Kazakh texts for language learners: Application of adaptation techniques. Bulletin of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 195(3), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.26577/EJPh.2024.v195.i3.ph06
36.
MaryNuemaihomA.IntanooK. (2023). Using novels in the language classroom. World Journal of English Language, 13(5), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V13N5P26
37.
McQuillanJ. (2016). What can readers read after graded readers?Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(1), 63–78.
NaraliyevaR. T.MukhanbekkyzyL.ToiganvekovaM. S.DosanovB. I.SultanovaB. M. (2015). Modern methods of teaching Kazakh as a foreign language: Search, innovation, quality, result. Review of European Studies, 7(7), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.5539/RES.V7N7P347
40.
NationP. (2014a). How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words?Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(2), 1–16.
41.
NationP. (2014b). What do you need to know to learn a foreign language. School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies Victoria University of Wellington.
42.
NationP.WangM. K. (1999). Graded readers and vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 12(2), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66966
43.
NurlangazykyzyB.KarymkhanA.A.MambetovaM.K. (2023). Enhancing motivation and engagement: The role of adapted texts in teaching foreign languages. Bulletin WKU, 90(2), 36–36. https://doi.org/10.37238/1680-0761.2023.90(2).36
44.
OrynbekovaA.S.MenlibekovaG.Z.AmanovaA.K.SarmurzinY.Z. (2024). Modern requirements for the professional activity and competence of a social teacher. International Journal of Educational Reform. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879241238365
45.
PhamN.Y.V.BakerJ.R.NguyễnT. (2024). Comparing the effects of two repeated reading methods on EFL learners’ reading rates. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 456. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02793-0
RosemarieB.NabilaK.B.KrisdianataY.Y.AverinaF.E.EnaF.X.O.T. (2023). Analysing the readability level of the short stories used in the IEEL course. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 17(2), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.15294/LC.V17I2.41570
48.
SamuelsS.J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32(4), 403–408.
49.
SarmurzinY.AmanzholN.ToleubayevaK.ZhunusovaM.AmanovaA. (2021). The impact of OECD research on the education system of Kazakhstan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09715-8
50.
SarmurzinY.AmanzholN.ToleubayevaK.ZhunusovaM.AmanovaA.AbiyrA. (2024). Challenging aspects of Kazakhstan’s trilingual education policy: Evidence from a literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25, 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09823-7
51.
SarmurzinY.KerimbekovaB.ToleubaevaK.ZhunusovaM.AmanzholN.ZhumagulovA. (2025). “Forced us to adopt alternative pedagogical approaches”: Kazakhstani reading literacy improvement initiatives. Research in Comparative and International Education, 20(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999251342142
52.
SarsekeG.KhopurA. (2024). Experience of applying neuroscience in teaching Kazakh as a second language. Bulletin of Ablai Khan KazUIRandWL: Series “Philological Sciences,”74(3), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.48371/PHILS.2024.3.74.025
53.
SarsenbayZ.SalkynbayA.RamazanovaS.AshirovaA.IgilikovaS.AlimtayevaL.KaspikhanB. (2023). Modern Kazakh language trends: Norms and USUS features. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(3), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSCL.2023.2006970.3096
54.
SchmittH.A.WitmerS.E.RoweS.S. (2022). Text readability, comprehension instruction, and student engagement: Examining associated relationships during text-based social studies instruction. Literacy Research and Instruction, 61(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.2008561
55.
SholichahI.R.PurbaniW. (2018). Fostering language skills development through fairy tales: A literature study. Proceedings of the International Conference of Communication Science Research (ICCSR 2018), Surabaya, Indonesia, pp. 330–334. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccsr-18.2018.73
56.
SimensenA.M. (1987). Adapted readers: How are they adapted?. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4(1), 41–57.
57.
SmagulovaJ. (2000). The re-acquisition of Kazakh in Kazakhstan: Achievements and challenges. In Ahn, E.S & J. Smagulova (Eds.), Language change in Central Asia (pp. 89–108). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514534-009
58.
TickooM.L. (1993). Simplification: Theory and application. Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization. Regional Language Centre.
59.
TrainR.W. (2010). Postcolonial complexities in foreign language education and the humanities. In LevineG.S.PhippsA. (Eds.), Critical and intercultural theory and language pedagogy (pp. 141–160). Heinle Cengage Learning. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/69686
60.
VerhoevenL. (2011). Second language reading acquisition. In KamilM.L.PearsonP.D.MojeE.B.AfflerbachP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume IV (Vol. 4, pp. 661–683). Routledge.
61.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society the development of higher psychological processes. MIT Press.
62.
YermekovaT.KapalbekB.RyskulbekD.OdanovaS. (2024). Actual problems of teaching the state language in higher educational institutions. Bulletin of S.Ualikhanov KU. PhilologicalSeries, 3, 229–238.
YoungD.J. (1999). Linguistic simplification of SL reading material: Effective instructional practice?Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00027
65.
ZhumashovaZ.AksholakovaA.OmirbekovaA.KulbekovaB. (2023). Challenges and recommendations for teaching and learning Kazakh as a second language. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 11(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSCL.2023.1995923.2967
