This longitudinal case study explores the adaptation process of an experienced English as a foreign language (EFL) teacher in a volunteer teaching environment. The primary objective is to identify the characteristics of language teacher adaptive expertise and the potential factors influencing its development. Data were collected through 75 teacher reflective journal entries, two semistructured interviews, students’ works, and relevant teaching materials. Data analysis followed the 6-step approach of thematic analysis. The findings of the study have been translated into a model for the development of adaptive expertise. This model accentuates individual and institutional characteristics as basis factors. Moreover, the model emphasizes continuous learning and student nurturing (i.e., how teachers can draw inspiration and strength from students’ performance and progress) as process factors. Implications of the study include strategies for organizing group reflection in large classes and teachers’ contribution to and benefits from community building. In addition, this study identifies some practical strategies for teacher–AI collaboration.
AlarcónR.Del Pilar JiménezE.de Vicente-YagüeM.I. (2020). Development and validation of the DIGIGLO, a tool for assessing the digital competence of educators. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2407–2421.
2.
BaardS.K.RenchT.A.KozlowskiS.W.J. (2013). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40, 48–99.
3.
BartoneP.T.KruegerG.P.BartoneJ.V. (2018). Individual differences in adaptability to isolated, confined and extreme environment. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 89, 538–546.
4.
Bohle CarbonellK.KöningsK.D.SegersM.van MerriënboerJ.J. (2016). Measuring adaptive expertise: Development and validation of an instrument. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 167–180.
5.
Bohle CarbonellK.StalmeijerR.E.KöningsK.D.SegersM.van MerriënboerJ.J.G. (2014). How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review, 12, 14–29.
6.
Brantley-DiasL.PuvirajahA.DiasM. (2021). Supporting teacher candidates’ multidimensional reflection: A model and a protocol. Reflective Practice, 22(2), 187–202.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
8.
BrinegarM. (2023). Examining reflective teaching practices in the digital age. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 7(12), 118–122.
9.
BrynildsenS.NagelI.EngenessI. (2022). Teachers’ perspectives on enhancing professional digital competence by participating in TeachMeet. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 45–63.
10.
CattaneoA.A.AntoniettiC.RauseoM. (2022). How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 176, 1–18.
11.
CelikI.DindarM.MuukkonenH.JärveläS. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630.
12.
ChanC.K.LeeK.K. (2021). Reflection literacy: A multilevel perspective on the challenges of using reflections in higher education through a comprehensive literature review. Educational Research Review, 32, 1–18.
13.
ChiuT.K.ChaiC.S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 1–18.
14.
CirockiA.FarrellT.S. (2017). Reflective practice for professional development of TESOL practitioners. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 6(2), 5–23.
DadoM.SpenceJ.R.ElliotJ. (2023). The case of contradictions: How prolonged engagement, reflexive journaling, and observations can contradict qualitative methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–8.
17.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think. Prometheus Books.
18.
DeweyJ. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19.
DreyfusH.L.DreyfusS.E. (2005). Peripheral vision: Expertise in real world contexts. Organization studies, 26(5), 779–792.
20.
El-SabaghH.A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–24.
21.
EricssonK.A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of expert performance. In EricssonK.A.CharnessN.FeltovichP.J.HoffmanR.R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–704). Cambridge University Press.
22.
EspositoG.FredaM.F. (2016). Reflective and agentive functions of narrative writing: A qualitative study on the narratives of university students. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(2), 333–357.
23.
FalloonG. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472.
24.
FaulknerF.KennyJ.CampbellC.CrisanC. (2019). Teacher learning and continuous professional development. In HobbsL.TörnerG. (Eds.), Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field” (pp. 1–42). Springer.
25.
Fernández-BataneroJ.M.Montenegro-RuedaM.Fernández-CereroJ.García-MartínezI. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531.
26.
FerrariA.PunieY. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Available at: http://digcomp.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/DIGCOMP-1.0-2013.pdf
27.
FinlaysonA. (2015). Reflective practice: Has it really changed over time?Reflective Practice, 16(6), 717–730.
28.
FosterC.J.PlantK.L.StantonN.A. (2019). Adaptation as a source of safety in complex sociotechnical systems: A literature review and model development. Safety Science, 118, 617–631.
29.
General Office of the Ministry of Education (GOME), & General Office of the Ministry of Finance (GOMF). (2024). 关于做好2024年“三区”人才支持计划教师专项计划有关实施工作的通知[Notice on the Implementation of the Teacher Special Project of the ‘Three-Area’ Talent Support Program in 2024]. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7058/202408/t20240807_1144579.html
30.
GilsterP. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.
31.
Gisbert CerveraM.CaenaF. (2022). Teachers’ digital competence for global teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 451–455.
32.
HansJ. (2024). Improving self-awareness and critical thinking through reflective practice. British Journal of Community Nursing, 29(Suppl. 9), S43–S46.
33.
HatanoG.InagakiK. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In StevensonH.AzumaH.HakutaK. (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). W. H. Freeman.
34.
HatanoG.OuraY. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32, 26–29.
35.
KemD. (2022). Personalised and adaptive learning: Emerging learning platforms in the era of digital and smart learning. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(2), 385–391.
36.
KimJ. (2024). Leading teachers’ perspective on teacher–AI collaboration in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8693–8724.
37.
KuaJ.LimW.S.TeoW.EdwardsR.A. (2021). A scoping review of adaptive expertise in education. Medical Teacher, 43, 347–355.
38.
LamR. (2023). E-Portfolios: What we know, what we don’t, and what we need to know. RELC Journal, 54(1), 208–215.
39.
MachwateS.BendaoudR.HenzeJ.BerradaK.BurgosD. (2021). Virtual exchange to develop cultural, language, and digital competencies. Sustainability, 13(11), 1–16.
40.
MarinhoP.FernandesP.PimentelF. (2021). The digital portfolio as an assessment strategy for learning in higher education. Distance Education, 42(2), 253–267.
41.
MasoumiD.NorooziO. (2025). Developing early career teachers’ professional digital competence: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 644–666.
42.
MishraP.KoehlerM. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 6, 1017–1054.
43.
MorrisonK. (1996). Developing reflective practice in higher degree students through a learning journal. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 317–332.
44.
OlsonR.BidewellJ.DuneT.LesseyN. (2016). Developing cultural competence through self-reflection in interprofessional education: Findings from an Australian university. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(3), 347–354.
45.
OrakcıŞ. (2021). Exploring the relationships between cognitive flexibility, learner autonomy, and reflective thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 1–13.
46.
ParkS.ParkS. (2019). Employee adaptive performance and its antecedents: Review and synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 18, 294–324.
47.
PelgrimE.HissinkE.BusL.van der SchaafM.NieuwenhuisL.van TartwijkJ.Kuijer-SiebelinkW. (2022). Professionals’ adaptive expertise and adaptive performance in educational and workplace settings: An overview of reviews. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27(5), 1245–1263.
48.
PrabhuN. S. (1990). There is no best method - Why? TESOL. Quarterly, 24(2), 161–176.
49.
PusicM.V.SantenS.A.DekhtyarM.PonceletA.N.RobertsN.K.Wilson-DelfosseA.L.CutrerW.B. (2018). Learning to balance efficiency and innovation for optimal adaptive expertise. Medical Teacher, 40(8), 820–827.
50.
SablićM.MirosavljevićA.ŠkugorA. (2021). Video-based learning (VBL) - past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1061–1077.
51.
Sánchez-CanutS.Usart-RodríguezM.Grimalt-ÁlvaroC.Martínez-RequejoS.Lores-GómezB. (2023). Professional digital competence: Definition, frameworks, measurement, and gender differences: A systematic literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023(1), 1–22.
52.
SchönD.A. (1983). Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
53.
Skantz-ÅbergE.Lantz-AnderssonA.LundinM.WilliamsP. (2022). Teachers’ professional digital competence: An overview of conceptualisations in the literature. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–23.
54.
SpiroR.J. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Technical Report No. 441. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED302821.pdf
55.
StiglerJ.W.MillerK.F. (2018). Expertise and expert performance in teaching. In EricssonK.A.HoffmanR.R.KozbeltA.WilliamsA.M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 431–452). Cambridge University Press.
56.
SunX. (2024). Teacher intuition and teacher development: An EFL teacher’s autoethnography. Issues in Educational Research, 34(2), 743–759.
57.
TimperleyH. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Open University Press.
58.
TimperleyH. (2013). Learning to practise: A paper for discussion. The University of Auckland.
59.
UNESCO. 2008. ICT competency standards for teachers. Policy framework. No. 156210. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
60.
UNESCO. 2018. UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
61.
VijS.TayalD.JainA. (2020). A machine learning approach for automated evaluation of short answers using text similarity based on WordNet graphs. Wireless Personal Communications, 111(2), 1271–1282.
62.
WallinA.NokelainenP.MikkonenS. (2019). How experienced professionals develop their expertise in work-based higher education: A literature review. Higher Education, 77, 359–378.
63.
WardP.GoreJ.HuttonR.ConwayG.E.HoffmanR.R. (2018). Adaptive skill as the conditio sine qua non of expertise. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 35–50.
