This study examined the effects of working memory and topic familiarity on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ oral performance from psycholinguistic perspective. Sixty-one sophomores majoring in English from a university in China were divided into high and low working memory capacity groups to perform two oral tasks of familiar and unfamiliar topics. The results demonstrated that working memory exerted significant effect on accuracy, fluency and overall grade, but no significant effect on syntactic or lexical complexity was found. Topic familiarity significantly affected lexical complexity, accuracy, fluency and overall grade, but syntactic complexity remained unaffected. Moreover, working memory and topic familiarity had significant interaction effects on fluency. Participants with high working memory capacity achieved the best fluency in tasks of familiar topic. The findings can be explained from Levelt’s model of speech production and Skehan’s limited attention capacity hypothesis. The findings also reveal that working memory is a central cognitive resource in second language speaking. The study concludes with implications for task selection and design in EFL teaching and assessment.
AhmadianM.J. (2012). The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task-based careful online planning condition. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/TESQ.8
2.
AwwadA.TavakoliP. (2019). Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(2), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0378
3.
BaddeleyA. (2015). Working memory in second language learning. In WenZ.E.MotaM.B.McNeillA. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17–28). Multilingual Matters.
4.
BergsleithnerJ.M. (2011). The role of noticing and working memory capacity in L2 oral performance. Organon, 26, 217–243. https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.28841
5.
BuiG. (2019). Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59(4), 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0244
6.
BuiG.HuangZ. (2018). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, methodology and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816656650
7.
BuiH.Y.G. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In SkehanP. (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance: Volume 5 (pp. 63–94). John Benjamins.
8.
BukhariN.I.A.IsmailL.Abu KassimN.L.Abu Bakar RazaliA.NoordinN.NohM.F.M. (2023). Topic familiarity effects on performance in speaking assessment tasks. Arab World English Journal, 14(4) 213–232. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no4.13
CookG. (1994). Discourse and literature. Oxford University Press.
11.
De BotK. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.
12.
FerreiraV.PashlerH. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1187–1199.
13.
GilabertR.MuñozC. (2010). Differences in attainment and performance in a foreign language: The role of working memory capacity. International Journal of English Studies, 1, 19–42.
14.
HanY.W. (2015). The impact of working memory capacity on oral accuracy, complexity and fluency of Chinese English learners. Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 36(5), 65–68.
15.
HyunJ.E.LeeJ.H. (2018). The effects of task complexity and working memory on Korean adult learners’ English speaking performance. English Teaching, 73(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.115
16.
JinH.Y.WangT.S. (2021). Task complexity, working memory capacity and L2 writing performance: The role of learner agency. Foreign Languages and their Teaching, 318(3), 102–113+150.
17.
KhabbazbashiN. (2015). Topic and background knowledge effects on performance in speaking assessment. Language Testing, 34(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215595666
18.
KormosJ. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Incorporated.
19.
KormosJ.TrebitsA. (2011). Working memory capacity and narrative task performance. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 267–285). John Benjamins.
20.
KuikenF.VedderI. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003
21.
LeveltW.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.
LiuC.Y. (2019). Psycholinguistic perspective on second language production. Science Press.
24.
LiuC.Y.SunL.T.HeY.WuN.Z. (2023). The effects of task complexity and language aptitude on EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 58, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100791
25.
LuX.F. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859
ManchónR.M.McBrideS.MartínezM.D.M.VasyletsO. (2023). Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45, 737–764. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000141
28.
MotaM.B. (2003). Working memory capacity and fluency, accuracy, complexity, and lexical density in L2 speech production. Fragmentos, 24, 69–104. https://doi.org/10.5007/fragmentos.v24i0.7659
29.
QiuX.Y. (2020). Functions of oral monologic tasks: Effects of topic familiarity on L2 speaking performance. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819829021
30.
RahimpourM.HazarF. (2007). Topic familiarity effect on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of L2 oral output. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(4), 191–211.
31.
RezaiM.J.OkhovatB. (2016). The effect of working memory on EFL learners’ oral fluency. International Journal of English Linguistic, 6(5), 74. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p74
32.
RobinsonP. (2011). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis on language learning and performance (pp. 3–18). John Benjamins.
33.
SkehanP. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.
34.
SkehanP. (2014). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In SkehanP. (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (task-based language teaching) (pp. 211–260). John Benjamins.
VuD.C.NguyenT.V.KitjaroonchaiN. (2024). Exploring the relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral fluency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(7), 2002–2012. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.06
37.
WenZ.S.MotaM.B.McNeillA. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In WenZ.MotaM.McNeillA. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 41–62). Multilingual Matters.
38.
XingJ.ZhaoH.LuoS.ZhangJ. (2024). Task complexity, working memory, task emotions, and oral performance of university students. Modern Foreign Languages, 47(1): 76–88. https://doi.org/10.20071/j.cnki.xdwy.20231027.007
39.
YuanF.EllisR. (2003). The effects of pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27.
