In recent years, the importance of language exposure and socioeconomic status (SES) in shaping learners’ language learning outcomes has gained significant attention in language educational studies. However, studies that directly investigated the correlation between language exposure from parents and peers, SES, and English digital reading achievement remained limited. This present study examined how language exposure from parents and peers interacted with SES in predicting English digital reading achievement among the three East Asian economies using the PISA 2018 data with 7,703 student participants from Macao, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Results from the Pearson correlation and hierarchical linear regression revealed: (1) that there is a negative relationship between language exposure from parents and English digital reading achievement; (2) that language exposure from best friends and siblings showed a positive influence on English digital reading achievement; and (3) that the effects of language exposure from schoolmates differed among the three economies. Although SES exerted a significant and positive impact on English digital reading achievement among the three East Asian economies, SES did not moderate the relationship between language exposure and English digital reading achievement. Implications and limitations are discussed.
AllenK.A.FortuneK.C.ArslanG. (2021). Testing the social-ecological factors of school belonging in native-born, first-generation, and second-generation Australian students: A comparison study. Social Psychology of Education, 24, 835–856.
2.
BernardoA.B.I. (2022). Growth mindset and reading proficiency of ESL learners: Examining the role of students’ socioeconomic status using PISA 2018 Philippine data. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38, 675–693.
3.
BlomE.BosmaE. (2016). The sooner the better? An investigation into the role of age of onset and its relation with transfer and exposure in bilingual Frisian–Dutch children. Journal of Child Language43, 581–607.
4.
BoltonK.Bacon-ShoneJ. (2020). The statistics of English across Asia. In: BoltonK.BothaW.KirkpatrickA. (Eds.), The handbook of Asian Englishes (pp. 49–80). Wiley Blackwell.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
6.
BuacM.GrossM.KaushanskayaM. (2014). The role of primary caregiver vocabulary knowledge in the development of bilingual children’s vocabulary skills. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1804–1816.
7.
BurgessS.R.HechtS.A.LoniganC.J. (2002). Relations of the home literacy environment (HLE) to the development of reading-related abilities: A one-year longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 408–426.
8.
ButlerY. (2013). Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: A case study in Mainland China. Research Papers in Education, 29, 410–37.
9.
ChiuM.M.WalkerA. (2007). Leadership for social justice in Hong Kong schools: addressing mechanisms of inequality. Journal of Educational Administration, 45, 724–39.
10.
De CarliF.DessiB.MarianiM., et al. (2015). Language use affects proficiency in Italian–Spanish bilinguals irrespective of age of second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 324–339.
11.
DestinM.HanselmanP.BuontempoJ.TiptonE.YeagerD.S. (2019). Do student mindsets differ by socioeconomic status and explain disparities in academic achievement in the United States?AERA Open, 5(3), 2332858419857706.
12.
DingX.LiS.ZhangX.ShiJ. (2024). The mediating role of executive function between socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic structural equation model. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102418.
13.
FarangiM.R.MehrpourS. (2022). Iranian preschoolers’ vocabulary development: Background television and socio-economic status. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 24, 422–44.
14.
GathercoleV.C.M. (2016). Factors moderating proficiency in bilingual speakers. In E.NicoladisMontanariS. (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Factors moderating language proficiency (pp. 123–136). De Gruyter Mouton.
15.
GottardoA.KohP.W.ChenX.JiaF. (2017). Models of English and Chinese word reading for adolescent Chinese–English bilinguals. Reading and Writing, 30, 1377–1406.
16.
GottfriedA.E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631–45.
17.
HamidM.O. (2011). Socio-economic characteristics and English language achievement in rural Bangladesh. Bangladesh eJournal of Sociology, 8, 31–50.
18.
HammerC.S.KomaroffE.RodriguezB.L.LopezL.M.ScarpinoS.E.GoldsteinB. (2012). Predicting Spanish–English Bilingual Children’s Language Abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1251–1264.
19.
HartB.RisleyT.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. P.H. Brookes.
HoffE. (2018). Bilingual development in children of immigrant families. Child Development Perspectives, 12, 80–86.
22.
HoffE. (2020). Lessons from the study of input effects on bilingual development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24, 82–88.
23.
HsuT.C.ChangC.JenT.H. (2024). Artificial intelligence image recognition using self-regulation learning strategies: effects on vocabulary acquisition, learning anxiety, and learning behaviours of English language learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 32, 3060–78.
24.
HuangB.ChangS.Y.H.NiuL.ZhiM. (2018). Examining the effects of socio-economic status and language input on adolescent English learners’ speech production outcomes. System, 73, 27–36.
25.
HuttenlocherJ.WaterfallH.VasilyevaM.VeveaJ.HedgesL.V. (2010). Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 343–365.
26.
LauroJ.CoreC.HoffE. (2020). Explaining individual differences in trajectories of simultaneous bilingual development: Contributions of child and environmental factors. Child Development, 91(6), 2063–2082.
27.
LeonaN.L.van KoertM.J.van der MolenM.W.RispensJ.E.TijmsJ.SnellingsP. (2021). Explaining individual differences in young English language learners’ vocabulary knowledge: The role of Extramural English Exposure and motivation. System, 96, 102402.
28.
LiuC.ChungK.K.H. (2022). Effects of fathers’ and mothers’ expectations and home literacy involvement on their children’s cognitive: Linguistic skills, vocabulary, and word reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60, 1–12.
29.
LiuD.ChungK.K.McBrideC. (2016). The role of SES in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) word reading in Chinese-speaking kindergarteners. Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 268–291.
30.
LuoS.KingR.B.WangF.LeungS.O. (2024). English digital reading achievement for East Asian students: Identifying the key predictors using a machine learning approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2398120
31.
LuoS.LinL.FuL.KingR.B.LeungS.O. (2024). The influence of ICT competencies on English digital reading achievement. International Journal of Educational Development, 110, Article 103139.
32.
MaL.XiaoL.LiuJ. (2024). Motivational beliefs of urban and rural students in English as a foreign language learning: The case of China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45, 1524–1537.
33.
MatsudaA., (2017). Preparing teachers to teach English as an international language. Multilingual Matters.
34.
MuellerC.W.ParcelT.L. (1981). Measures of socioeconomic status: Alternatives and recommendations. Child Development, 52, 13–30.
35.
NiD.LeonardJ.D. (2005). Markov chain Monte Carlo multiple imputation using Bayesian networks for incomplete intelligent transportation systems data. Transportation Research Record, 1935(1), 57–67.
OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. Volume I. OECD. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en (accessed January 2025).
PersiciV.MajoranoM.BastianelloT.HoffE. (2022). Vocabulary and reading speed in the majority language are affected by maternal language proficiency and language exposure at home: a study of language minority bilingual children in Italy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25, 3729–44.
41.
PrevooM.J.L.MaldaM.EmmenR.A.G.YeniadN.MesmanJ. (2015). Language Use and SES as Potential Moderators. Language learning, 65, 449–69.
42.
PuglisiM.L.HulmeC.HamiltonL.G.SnowlingM.J. (2017). The home literacy environment is a correlate, but perhaps not a cause, of variations in children’s language and literacy development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 498–514.
43.
SaraceniM. (2020). Globalization and Asian Englishes. In: K. Bolton, W. Botha, & A. Kirkpatrickk. (Eds.), The handbook of Asian Englishes. Wiley Blackwell, 707–724.
44.
ScaffC.FiblaL.CristiaA. (2022). Factors structuring lexical development in toddlers: The effects of parental education, language exposure, and age. Journal of Child Language, 50, 757–77.
45.
SunH.SteinkraussR.TendeiroJ.De BotK. (2015). Individual differences in very young children’s English acquisition in China: Internal and external factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 550–66.
46.
SunH.YinB.AmsahN.F.B.B.O’BrienB.A. (2018). Differential effects of internal and external factors in early bilingual vocabulary learning: The case of Singapore. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39, 383–411.
47.
TengM.F.CuiY. (2024). Comparing incidental learning of single words and collocations from different captioning conditions: The role of vocabulary knowledge and working memory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40, 973–89.
48.
ThompsonC.G.von GillernS. (2020). Video-game based instruction for vocabulary acquisition with English language learners: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 100332.
49.
UnsworthS. (2016). Early child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or both?Journal of Child Language, 43, 608–34.
50.
UstunU.CansizM.OzdemirE.CansizN. (2022). Student and school-level factors to predict science literacy for two top-performing countries in PISA 2015: Finland and Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 44, 579–603.
51.
VaahtorantaE.SuggateS.LenhartJ.LenhardW. (2021). Language exposure and phonological short-term memory as predictors of majority language vocabulary and phonological awareness in dual language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition24, 319–32.
52.
ZhangX.LauC.SuY. (2021). Home environment and development of English as a second/foreign language for young children in Asian contexts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Early Education and Development, 34, 1–32.
