The two main purposes of the current meta-analysis were (a) to determine the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) of students and academic performance (AP) (b) and evaluate the effect of several potential moderating factors in this relation. Data covered the publications between 2010 and 2019, and the dataset consisted of 48 independent studies that included 62 different samples, and the total sample was 386.601. Findings revealed that the relation between SES and academic performance represented a moderate positive correlation. All moderators, type of SES measure, academic performance scale, location, grade level, subjects of academic performance, and year, produced significant effects, respectively. These findings were discussed for every category of moderators with the related literature.
AdegokeS. P.OsokoyaM. M. (2015). Socio-economic background and access to internet as correlates of students’ achievement in agricultural science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 4(1), 16–21.
BaeD.WickramaK. A. S. (2015). Family socioeconomic status and academic achievement among Korean adolescents: Linking mechanisms of family processes and adolescents’ time use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(7), 1014–1038.
4.
BakerE. H. (2014). Socioeconomic status, definition. In CockerhamW. C.DingwallR.QuahS. R. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society (pp. 2210–2214). Wiley-Blackwell.
5.
BlumsA.BelskyJ.GrimmK.ChenZ. (2017). Building links between early socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, and math and science achievement. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(1), 16–40.
6.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
7.
CarnoyM.RothsteinR. (2013). What do international tests really show about US student performance. Economic Policy Institute, 28, 32–33.
8.
CaroD. H. (2009). Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(3), 558–590.
9.
CedeñoL. F.Martínez-AriasR.BuenoJ. A. (2016). Implications of socioeconomic status on academic competence: A perspective for teachers. International Education Studies, 9(4), 257–267.
10.
CilasunS. (2013). An analysis of academic performance: Could family income and medium of instruction be determinants?Socio Economy, 19(19), 9–23.
11.
CohenP. A.DacanayL. S. (1992). Computer-based instruction and health professions education: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 15(3), 259–281.
12.
ColemanJ. S.CampbellE. Q.HobsonC. J.McPartlandJ.MoodA. M.WeinfieldF. D.YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office.
DįncerS. (2018). Eğitim bilimleri araştırmalarında içerik analizi: Meta-analiz, meta-sentez, betimsel içerik analizi [Content analysis in educational sciences researches: Meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, descriptive content analysis]. Bartin University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(1), 176–190.
15.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463.
16.
FarahM. J.HackmanD. A. (2012). SES, childhood experience, and the neural bases of cognition. In MaholmesV.KingR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of poverty and child development (pp. 307–318). Oxford University Press.
17.
FenigerY.LefsteinA. (2014). How not to reason with PISA data: An ironic investigation. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 845–855.
18.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE.
19.
GobenaG. A. (2018). Family socio-economic status effect on students’ academic achievement at college of education and behavioral sciences, Haramaya University, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(3), 207–222.
20.
GraetzM. J. (1995). Paint-by-numbers tax lawmaking. Columbia Law Review, 95, Article 609.
21.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558.
22.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560.
23.
JerrimJ.MicklewrightJ.HeineJ. H.SalzerC.McKeownC. (2018). PISA 2015: How big is the ‘mode effect and what has been done about it?Oxford Review of Education, 44(4), 476–493.
24.
KaradagE.BektasF.CogaltayN.YalcinM. (2015). The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: A meta-analysis study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(1), 79–93.
25.
KaradagE.İsçiS.OztekinS.AnarS. (2016). The relationship between school climate and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(2), 107–122.
26.
KepesS.BanksG. C.McDanielM.WhetzelD. L. (2012). Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), 624–662.
27.
Koban KocD. (2016). The effects of socio-economic status on prospective English language teachers’ academic achievement. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 10(2), 100–112.
28.
Koza CiftciŞ. K.CinF. M. (2017). The effect of socioeconomic status on students’ achievement. In KaradağE. (Ed.), The factors effecting student achievement (pp. 171–181). Springer.
29.
KusaeriK.AditomoA.RidhoA.FuadA. (2018). Socioeconomic status, parental involvement in learning and student’ mathematics achievement in Indonesian senior high school. Cakrawala Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 37(3), 333–344.
30.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
31.
LiuJ.PengP.LuoL. (2019). The relation between family socioeconomic status and academic achievement in China: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 1–28.
32.
LongH.PangW. (2016). Family socioeconomic status, parental expectations, and adolescents’ academic achievements: A case of China. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(5–6), 283–304.
33.
MarksG. N. (2009). Modernization theory and changes over time in the reproduction of socioeconomic inequalities in Australia. Social Forces, 88(2), 917–944.
34.
MarksG. N.PokropekA. (2019). Family income effects on mathematics achievement: Their relative magnitude and causal pathways. Oxford Review of Education, 45(6), 769–785.
35.
Ministry of National Education. (2017). Evaluation and monitoring report of academic performance of 8th grades. Ankara.
36.
Ministry of National Education. (2019). Evaluation and monitoring report of academic performance of 8th grades. Ankara.
37.
NesbittK. T.Baker-WardL.WilloughbyM. T. (2013). Executive function mediates socio-economic and racial differences in early academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 774–783.
38.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
39.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Policies and practices for successful schools (Vol. 2). PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en
40.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en
OzelZ. E. Y.OzelS.ThompsonB. (2013). SES-related mathematics achievement gap in Turkey compared to European Union countries. Education and Science, 38(170), 179–193.
44.
PengP.WangT.WangC.LinX. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics: Effects of tasks, age, and social economics status. Psychological Bulletin, 145(2), Article 189.
45.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. Whither Opportunity, 1(1), 91–116.
46.
ReimerD.SortkearB.OskarssonM.NilsenT.RasmussonM.NissinenK. (2018). Northern lights on TIMSS and PISA 2018. Nordic Council of Ministers.
47.
RobinsonV. M.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
48.
RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). Wiley.
49.
SarierY. (2016). Factors affecting the academic achievement of students in Turkey: A meta-analysis study. Hacettepe University Journal of Educational Faculty, 31(3), 609–627.
50.
ScottJ.MarshallG. (2005). Oxford dictionary of sociology. Oxford University Press.
51.
SirinS. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
52.
StevensC.LauingerB.NevilleH. (2009). Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: An event-related brain potential study. Developmental Science, 12(4), 634–646.
53.
SuphiN.YaratanH. (2012). Effects of learning approaches, locus of control, socio-economic status and self-efficacy on academic achievement: A Turkish perspective. Educational Studies, 38(4), 419–431.
54.
TanC. Y. (2015). The contribution of cultural capital to students’ mathematics achievement in medium and high socioeconomic gradient economies. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1050–1067.
55.
TomulE.SavasciH. S. (2012). Socioeconomic determinants of academic achievement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(3), 175–187.
56.
TopcuM. S.ErbilginE.ArikanS. (2016). Factors predicting Turkish and Korean students’ science and mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1711–1737.
57.
TreimanD. J.GanzeboomH. B. G.RijkenS. (2003). California Center for Population Research, on-line working paper series: Educational expansion and educational achievement in comparative perspective. California Centre for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles.
58.
TynkkynenL.VuoriJ.Salmela-AroK. (2012). The role of psychological control, socioeconomic status and academic achievement in parents’ educational aspirations for their adolescent children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(6), 695–710.
UstunU.EryilmazA. (2014). A research methodology to conduct effective research syntheses: Meta-analysis. Education and Science, 39(174), 1–32.
61.
von StummS. (2017). Socioeconomic status amplifies the achievement gap throughout compulsory education independent of intelligence. Intelligence, 60, 57–62.
62.
WhiteK. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461–481.
63.
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise.
64.
XuanX.XueY.ZhangC.LuoY.JiangW.QiM.WangY. (2019). Relationship among school socioeconomic status, teacher-student relationship, and middle school students’ academic achievement in China: Using the multilevel mediation model. PLOS ONE, 14(3), 1–16.
65.
ZhaoN.ValckeM.DesoeteA.VerhaegheJ. (2012). The quadratic relationship between socioeconomic status and learning performance in China by multilevel analysis: Implications for policies to foster education equity. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(3), 412–422.
66.
ZuzovskyR. (2010). The impact of socioeconomic versus linguistic factors on achievement gaps between Hebrew-speaking and Arabic-speaking students in Israel in reading literacy and in mathematics and science achievements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(4), 153–161.
67.
AdegokeS. P.OsokoyaM. M. (2015). Socio-economic background and access to internet as correlates of students’ achievement in agricultural science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 4(1), 16–21.
68.
AslanargunE.BozkurtS.SariogluS. (2016). The impacts of socioeconomic variables on the academic success of the students. Usak University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(27–23), 201–234.
69.
BaeD.WickramaK. A. S. (2015). Family socioeconomic status and academic achievement among Korean adolescents: Linking mechanisms of family processes and adolescents’ time use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(7), 1014–1038.
70.
BakerC. E.KainzK. L.ReynoldsE. R. (2018). Family poverty, family processes and children’s preschool achievement: Understanding the unique role of fathers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(4), 1242–1251.
71.
BennerA. D.BoyleA. E.SadlerS. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1053–1064.
72.
BlumsA.BelskyJ.GrimmK.ChenZ. (2017). Building links between early socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, and math and science achievement. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(1), 16–40.
73.
ChiaoC.ChiuC. H. (2018). The mediating effect of ICT usage on the relationship between students’ socioeconomic status and achievement. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(2), 109–121.
74.
ChungK. K.LiuH.McBrideC.WongA. M. Y.LoJ. C. (2017). How socioeconomic status, executive functioning and verbal interactions contribute to early academic achievement in Chinese children. Educational Psychology, 37(4), 402–420.
75.
CiftciC.CaglarA. (2014). The effect of socio-economic characteristics of parents on student achievement: Is poverty destiny?International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 155–175.
76.
CilasunS. (2013). An analysis of academic performance: Could family income and medium of instruction be determinants?. Socio Economy, 19(19), 9–23.
77.
DemirS. B.DemirtaslıN. (2014). The prediction of Turkish students’ reading literacy skills by SES related variables for PISA 2003–2006–2009. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 47(2), 201–222.
78.
DestinM.HanselmanP.BuontempoJ.TiptonE.YeagerD. S. (2019). Do student mindsets differ by socioeconomic status and explain disparities in academic achievement in the United States?AERA Open, 5(3), 1–12.
79.
DestinM.RichmanS.VarnerF.MandaraJ. (2012). “Feeling” hierarchy: The pathway from subjective social status to achievement. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1571–1579.
80.
DixsonD. D.KeltnerD.WorrellF. C.MelloZ. (2018). The magic of hope: Hope mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 507–515.
81.
DoleanD.Melby-LervågM.TincasI.DamsaC.LervågA. (2019). Achievement gap: Socioeconomic status affects reading development beyond language and cognition in children facing poverty. Learning and Instruction, 63,1–10.
82.
DuanW.GuanY.BuH. (2018). The effect of parental involvement and socioeconomic status on junior school students’ academic achievement and school behavior in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–8.
83.
DudaiteJ. (2016). Impact of socio-economic home environment on student learning achievement. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 7(3), 854–871.
84.
ErdoğanE.GüvendirM. A. (2019). The relationship between students’ socioeconomic attributes and their reading skills in programme for international student assessment. Eskisehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 20, 493–523.
85.
FungW. K.ChungK. K. H. (2020). The role of socioeconomic status in Chinese word reading and writing among Chinese kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 33(3), 1–21.
86.
GobenaG. A. (2018). Family socio-economic status effect on students’ academic achievement at college of education and behavioral sciences, Haramaya University, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(3), 207–222.
87.
KalayciogluD. B. (2015). The influence of socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, and anxiety on mathematics achievement in England, Greece, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the USA. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(5), 1391–1401.
88.
KlappA. (2018). Does academic and social self-concept and motivation explain the effect of grading on students’ achievement?European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(2), 355–376.
89.
Koban KocD. (2016). The effects of socio-economic status on prospective English language teachers’ academic achievement. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 10(2), 100–112.
90.
KusaeriK.AditomoA.RidhoA.FuadA. (2018). Socioeconomic status, parental involvement in learning and student’ mathematics achievement in Indonesian senior high school. Cakrawala Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 37(3), 333–344.
91.
LongH.PangW. (2016). Family socioeconomic status, parental expectations, and adolescents’ academic achievements: A case of China. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(5–6), 283–304.
92.
MarksG. N.PokropekA. (2019). Family income effects on mathematics achievement: Their relative magnitude and causal pathways. Oxford Review of Education, 45(6), 769–785.
93.
Ministry of National Education. (2017). Evaluation and monitoring report of academic performance of 8th grades. Ankara.
94.
Ministry of National Education. (2019). Evaluation and monitoring report of academic performance of 8th grades. Ankara.
95.
NesbittK. T.Baker-WardL.WilloughbyM. T. (2013). Executive function mediates socio-economic and racial differences in early academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 774–783.
96.
OsadebeP. U.OghomenaD. E. (2018). Assessment of gender, location and socio-economic status on students’ performance in senior secondary certificate examination in mathematics. International Education Studies, 11(8), 98–109.
97.
OzdemirN.AyralM.FindikL. Y.UnluA.OzarslanH.BozkurtE. (2014). The relationship between students’ socioeconomic status and their Turkish achievements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 726–731.
98.
OzelZ. E. Y.OzelS.ThompsonB. (2013). SES-related mathematics achievement gap in Turkey compared to European Union countries. Education and Science, 38(170), 179–193.
99.
SchwagerI. T.HülshegerU. R.BridgemanB.LangJ. W. (2015). Graduate student selection: Graduate record examination, socioeconomic status, and undergraduate grade point average as predictors of study success in a Western European University. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23(1), 71–79.
100.
ShahS. A.AhmadS.ChitraliJ. A. (2016). Relationship of different levels of socioeconomic status and academic achievement of secondary school students. PUTAJ-Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(2), 151–159.
101.
Suárez-ÁlvarezJ.Fernández-AlonsoR.MuñizJ. (2014). Self-concept, motivation, expectations, and socioeconomic level as predictors of academic performance in mathematics. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 118–123.
102.
SuphiN.YaratanH. (2012). Effects of learning approaches, locus of control, socio-economic status and self-efficacy on academic achievement: A Turkish perspective. Educational Studies, 38(4), 419–431.
103.
TanC. Y. (2015). The contribution of cultural capital to students’ mathematics achievement in medium and high socioeconomic gradient economies. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1050–1067.
104.
TomulE.SavasciH. S. (2012). Socioeconomic determinants of academic achievement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(3), 175–187.
105.
TopcuM. S.ErbilginE.ArikanS. (2016). Factors predicting Turkish and Korean students’ science and mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1711–1737.
106.
Tucker-DrobE. M. (2013). How many pathways underlie socioeconomic differences in the development of cognition and achievement?Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 12–20.
107.
TynkkynenL.VuoriJ.Salmela-AroK. (2012). The role of psychological control, socioeconomic status and academic achievement in parents’ educational aspirations for their adolescent children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(6), 695–710.
108.
Urfalı DadandıP.DadandıĠ.KocaF. (2018). The relationships between socio economic factors and reading literacy according to PISA 2015 Turkey results. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 7(2), 1239–1252.
109.
von StummS. (2017). Socioeconomic status amplifies the achievement gap throughout compulsory education independent of intelligence. Intelligence, 60, 57–62.
110.
WeiserD. A.RiggioH. R. (2010). Family background and academic achievement: Does self-efficacy mediate outcomes?Social Psychology of Education, 13(3), 367–383.
111.
XuanX.XueY.ZhangC.LuoY.JiangW.QiM.WangY. (2019). Relationship among school socioeconomic status, teacher-student relationship, and middle school students’ academic achievement in China: Using the multilevel mediation model. PLOS ONE, 14(3), 1–16.
112.
YildirimS. (2019). Predicting mathematics achievement: The role of socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and self-confidence. Education and Science, 44(198), 99–113.
113.
ZhaoN.ValckeM.DesoeteA.VerhaegheJ. (2012). The quadratic relationship between socioeconomic status and learning performance in China by multilevel analysis: Implications for policies to foster education equity. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(3), 412–422.
114.
ZuzovskyR. (2010). The impact of socioeconomic versus linguistic factors on achievement gaps between Hebrew-speaking and Arabic-speaking students in Israel in reading literacy and in mathematics and science achievements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(4), 153–161.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
