Incorporating iterative continuation tasks into EFL writing courses

Abstract

This study explored how the iterative continuation task can be incorporated into a writing course in a setting for English as a foreign language (EFL). It investigated the effectiveness of the iterative continuation task in influencing senior high school students’ writing performance and their writing attitudes. Eighty-four year-one students from a China’s provincial senior high school participated in the study. They were divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group, each consisting of 42 students. The experimental group was subjected to six turns of reading–writing continuation tasks, whereas the control group continued with the previous practice of a single turn of reading–writing continuation tasks. Data were collected from writing tests and questionnaires. The results show that the iterative continuation task helped improve students’ writing performance in lexis and grammar rather than organization and content and it also had a positive impact on changing students’ writing attitude, especially on the dimensions of writing perception and writing process. The iterative continuation task has been proved to be a facilitative pedagogical approach for language development in EFL senior high school contexts.

Keywords

English writing courses iterative continuation tasks senior high school writing attitude writing performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J.R.

(1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.

Bui

Luo

X.Y.

(2021). Topic familiarity and story continuation in young English as a foreign language learners’ writing tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11, 377–400.

Cai

D.H.

Huang

L.Y.

(2023). Effects of input modality on alignment in continuation writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101060.

Chen

J.H.

Zhang

X.P.

(2022). L2 development of phraseological knowledge via a xu-argument based continuation task: A latent curve modeling approach. System, 106, 102767.

Cui

Y.Y.

Yang

L.R.

Wolter

(2022). Alignment effect in the continuation task of Chinese low-intermediate English learners. Applied Linguistics Review, 13, 501–526.

Emig

King

(1979). Emig–King attitude scale for students. Educational Resources Information Centre.

Fitzgerald

Shanahan

(2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 39–50.

Kang

E.Y.

(2020). Using model texts as a form of feedback in L2 writing. System, 89, 102196.

Meng

Yin

(2023). Effects of input enhancement and genre on L2 learners’ performance in the continuation writing task. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 959.

10.

Nunan

(1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.

11.

Pallant

(2013). SPSS survival manual (5th ed.). Open University Press.

12.

Peng

Wang

(2020). Effect of the linguistic complexity of the input text on alignment, writing fluency, and writing accuracy in the continuation task. Language Teaching Research, 24, 364–381.

13.

Pickering

M.J.

Garrod

(2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Science, 27, 169–190.

14.

Ruegg

(2015). The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability. Linguistics and Education, 29, 73–82.

15.

Storch

(2018). Learning writing. In A.

Burns

Richards

J.C.

(Eds.), The Cambridge guide to learning English as a second language (pp. 222–230). Cambridge University Press.

16.

Swain

Lapkin

(1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 3, 320–327.

17.

Wang

C.M.

(2016). Learning by extension. Modern Foreign Languages, 6, 784–793.

18.

Wang

C.M.

(2018). How to improve the interaction intensity in reading–writing continuation tasks? Foreign Language World, 5, 40–45.

19.

Wang

C.M.

(2021). The rationale for the high efficiency of xu-argument in promoting L2 learning. Foreign Language World, 6, 2–7.

20.

Wang

C.M.

Wang

(2015). Alignment effect on L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 36, 503–526.

21.

Wang

Gan

Boland

(2021). L2 syntactic alignment in the reading–writing integrated continuation task: Evidence from Chinese EFL learners’ description of motion events. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 44, 292–313.

22.

Wang

Gan

Boland

J.E.

(2022). Effect of interactive intensity on lexical alignment and L2 writing quality. System, 108, 102847.

23.

Zhang

(2022). Effect of interaction and alignment of continuation task in Chinese as a second language writing. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2072312

24.

Zhang

L.J.

(2021). Effects of a xu-argument based iterative continuation task on an EFL learner’s linguistic and affective development: Evidence from errors, self-initiated error corrections, and foreign language learning attitude. System, 98, 102481.

25.

Zhang

X.Y.

(2017). Reading–writing integrated tasks, comprehensive corrective feedback, and EFL writing development. Language Teaching Research, 21, 217–240.

26.

Zhang

X.Y.

Zhu

X.Y.

(2022). Effects of the continuation task and the RCC task on Japanese as a foreign language vocabulary learning. Applied Linguistics, 43, 725–745.

27.

Zhou

Wang

(2024). Effects of interactive alignment on L2 vocabulary learning by Chinese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 28, 466–496.

28.

Zhu

X.H.

Zhan

J.L.

Yao

(2024). A latent profile analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ enjoyment and anxiety in reading and writing: Associations with imaginative capacity and story continuation writing performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62, 807–841.