The aim of the current study was to analyse receptive and productive knowledge development of words belonging to 2000, 3000, and 5000 frequency levels in the Global South setting. The data were collected from 278 first-year university students after they finished both elementary and high school in the English as a foreign language (EFL) context of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study researched the dependency of receptive and productive knowledge on a few variables, namely the students’ grammatical competence, the methods of vocabulary teaching, the use of English within EFL classes, and the outside-school exposure to it. The results revealed a significant relationship between all the aforementioned variables and students’ productive and receptive vocabulary knowledge. Such findings are expected to provide assistance to educators and students in similar environments, giving direct guidelines for practice leading to greater receptive and productive EFL vocabulary knowledge, i.e. showing how EFL vocabulary learning challenges can be faced to open up favorable opportunities for its development.
BachmanL.F.PalmerA.S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.
2.
BaoG. (2015). Task type effects on English as a foreign language learners’ acquisition of receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. System, 53, 84–95.
3.
BarcroftJ. (2007). When knowing grammar depends on knowing vocabulary: Native speaker grammaticality judgements of sentences with real and unreal words. The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 63, 313–343.
4.
BećirovićS.Brdarević-ČeljoA. (2018). Exploring and assessing cross-cultural sensitivity in Bosnian tertiary education: Is there a real promise of harmonious coexistence?European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7, 244–256.
5.
Brdarević-ČeljoA. (2024). Attitudes towards English in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A comparative study. Sage Open, 14(3).
6.
Brdarević-ČeljoA.AhmetovićE.BajićE. (2024). Variations in attitudes towards codeswitching and codeswitching frequency among multilingual speakers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45, 1493–1508.
7.
Brdarević-ČeljoA.BećirovićS.BurekovićM. (2018). The use of imaginative conditional clauses by Bosnian university-level English-majoring students. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education, 11, 25–40.
8.
Brdarević-ČeljoA.BećirovićS.DubravacV. (2021). An examination of perceived reading strategy use among university level students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10, 595–608.
9.
Brdarević-ČeljoA.DubravacV. (2022). Engleski u BiH: Između uglađenog i ležernog? [English in B&H [Bosnia and Herzegovina]: Posh or casual?]. Multidisciplinary Academic Publishing.
10.
ConboyB.T.ThalD.J. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development, 77, 712–735.
11.
CookG. (2010). Translation in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
12.
CookV. (1996). Competence and multi-competence. Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition, 57.
13.
CoxheadA.BythewayJ. (2015). Learning vocabulary using two massive online resources: You will not blink. In NunanD.RichardsJ.C. (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 65–74). Routledge.
14.
DabbaghA.Janebi EnayatM. (2019). The role of vocabulary breadth and depth in predicting second language descriptive writing performance. Language Learning Journal, 47, 575–590.
15.
DautbašićA.BećirovićS. (2022). Teacher and student experiences in online classes during COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. MAP Social Sciences, 2, 9–17.
16.
De WildeV.BrysbaertM.EyckmansJ. (2020). Learning English through out-of-school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 171–185.
17.
DervićM.BećirovićS. (2020). Prerogative of the lexical approach in communicative language teaching. European Journal of Education Studies, 7, 1–13.
18.
DionneG.DaleP.S.BoivinM.PlominR. (2003). Genetic evidence for bidirectional effects of early lexical and grammatical development. Child Development, 74, 394–412.
19.
DubravacV. (2011). Poteškoće koje učenici osnovne škole imaju pri usvajanju gradiva iz gramatike engleskog jezika [Difficulties elementary school students face when acquiring English grammar]. Didaktički putokazi, 58, 60–64.
20.
DubravacV. (2016). The impact of English on language use in the Bosnian Press. In BuckinghamL. (Eds.), The status of English in Bosnia and Herzegovina (pp. 203–227). Multilingual Matters.
21.
DubravacV.Brdarević-ČeljoA. (in press). English in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In BoltonK. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of world Englishes. Wiley Blackwell.
22.
DubravacV.Brdarević-ČeljoA.BećirovićS. (2018). The English of Bosnia and Herzegovina. World Englishes, 37, 635–652.
23.
DubravacV.LatićE. (2019). The plasticity of students’ language learning beliefs: The interplay of gender, grade and educational level. Journal of Language and Education, 5, 36–53.
24.
DubravacV.SkopljakN. (2020). Foreign and multilingual language play on social sites as an identity marker. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 15, 61–79.
25.
EllisN.C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.
26.
EllisN.C.WulffS. (2014). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In VanPattenB.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 75–93). Routledge.
27.
GhobadiM.GhasemiH. (2015). Promises and obstacles of L1 use in language classrooms: A state-of-the-art review. English Language Teaching, 8, 245–254.
28.
GoodmanE.B.J.C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5–6), 507–584.
29.
GriffithsC. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367–383.
30.
GriffithsC. (2006). Language learning strategies: Theory and research. Language Teaching Journal, 2, 1–29.
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
33.
HenriksenB. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 303–317.
34.
HulstijnJ.H.LauferB. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–558.
35.
KovačevićF.Brdarević-ČeljoA.BećirovićS. (2018). Opportunities and challenges facing Bosnian high-school EFL learners. European Researcher, 9, 298–306.
36.
KrollJ.F.StewartE. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.
37.
KuppensA.H. (2010). Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology, 35, 65–85.
38.
LaličićA.DubravacV.BećirovićS. (2020). The interconnection between vocabulary learning strategies and EFL learning outcomes. European Journal of Education Studies, 7, 106–130.
39.
LauferB. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 223–250.
40.
LauferB.HulstijnJ. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26.
41.
LauferB.NationP. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33–51.
42.
LauferB.ParibakhtT.S. (1998). The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of languagelearning context. Language Learning, 48(3), 365–391.
43.
LeeJ.H.MacaroE. (2013). Investigating age in the use of L1 or English-only instruction: Vocabulary acquisition by Korean EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 887–901.
44.
LeowR.P.HsiehH.C.MorenoN. (2008). Attention to form and meaning revisited. Language Learning, 58, 665–695.
45.
LiY.HafnerC.A. (2022). Mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: Investigating receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge of Chinese EFL learners. ReCALL, 34, 66–80.
46.
MaitalS.L.DromiE.SagiA.BornsteinM.H. (2000). The Hebrew Communicative Development Inventory: Language specific properties and cross-linguistic generalizations. Journal of Child Language, 27, 43–67.
47.
MarchmanV.A.BatesE. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–366.
48.
MarchmanV.A.Martínez-SussmannC.DaleP.S. (2004). The language-specific nature of grammatical development: Evidence from bilingual language learners. Developmental Science, 7, 212–224.
49.
MašićA.TarabarA. (2021). The influence of online games on learning English vocabulary in high schools in Bosnia and Herzegovina. MAP Education and Humanities, 1, 28–37.
50.
MatthewsJ. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72, 23–36.
MelkaF. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In SchmittN.McCarthyM. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 84–102). Cambridge University Press.
53.
MilesJ.ShevlinM. (2001). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. Sage.
54.
MuñozC.CadiernoT. (2021). How do differences in exposure affect English language learning? A comparison of teenagers in two learning environments. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11, 185–212.
55.
NationP. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82.
56.
NationP. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
57.
NationP. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27, 136–145.
58.
NationP. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
59.
NematiA. (2010). Active and passive vocabulary knowledge: The effect of years of instruction. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 12(1), 30–46.
60.
ParibakhtT.S. (2004). The role of grammar in second language lexical processing. RELC Journal, 35(2), 149–160.
61.
ParibakhtT.S.WescheM. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195–224.
62.
PennycookA.MakoniS. (2020). Innovations and challenges in applied linguistics from the Global South. Routledge.
63.
PetersE. (2018). The effect of out-of-class exposure to English language media on learners’ vocabulary knowledge. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169, 142–168.
64.
PetersE.WebbS. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 551–577.
65.
PolzE.BećirovićS. (2022). Competency based teaching and learning. Multidisciplinary Academic Publishing.
66.
ReadJ. (2004). Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 146–161.
67.
RiboR.DubravacV. (2021). The influence of the English Language on BCS with the focus on the business register. MAP Education and Humanities, 1, 20–27.
68.
RudwickS.MakoniS. (2021) Southernizing and decolonizing the sociology of language: African scholarship matters. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021, 259–263.
69.
RyuD. (2013). Play to learn, learn to play: Language learning through gaming culture. ReCALL, 25, 286–301.
70.
SavkovićK.VasićN. (2019). Internet kao važan segment informaciono-komunikacijskih tehnologija prilikom učenja i u nastavi engleskog jezika [The internet as an important segment of information and communication technologies when learning and teaching English]. Research in Pedagogy, 9, 216–230.
71.
SchmittN. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
72.
SchmittN. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64, 913–951.
73.
SchmittN. (2019). Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 52, 261–274.
74.
SchmittN.MearaP. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 17–36.
75.
SchmittN.SchmittD. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47, 484–503.
76.
SchmittN.SchmittD.ClaphamC. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.
77.
ScottV.M.De la FuenteM.J. (2008). What is the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during consciousness-raising form-focused tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 100–113.
78.
ShenZ. (2008). The roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in EFL reading performance. Asian Social Science, 12, 135–137.
79.
Simon-CerejidoG.Gutiérrez-ClellenV.F. (2009). A cross-linguistic and bilingual evaluation of the interdependence between lexical and grammatical domains. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 315–337.
80.
SkopljakN.DubravacV. (2017). Use of authentic materials and L1 in English language learning classrooms in B&H. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3, 469–476.
81.
SkopljakN.DubravacV. (2019). The impact of English on the Bosnian language and the use of English words in Bosnian. HUM, 14, 138–156.
82.
SonM.LeeJ.GodfroidA. (2022). Attention to form and meaning revisited: Insights from eye tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44, 788–817.
83.
SundqvistP.SylvénL.K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
84.
TahmasbiM.FarvardinM.T. (2017). Probing the effects of task types on EFL learners’ receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: The case of involvement load hypothesis. Sage Open, 7(3).
85.
TankosićA.DubravacV. (2016). The assessment of Bosnian EFL learners’ knowledge by two different measures: test and writing assignment. Exell, 4, 41–57.
86.
TengF. (2019). The effects of context and word exposure frequency on incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. The Language Learning Journal, 47, 145–158.
87.
ThordardottirE.T.WeismerS.E.EvansJ.L. (2002). Continuity in lexical and morphological development in Icelandic and English-speaking 2-year-olds. First Language, 22, 3–28.
88.
Treffers-DallerJ.DallerH.M.MalvernD.RichardsB.MearaP.MiltonJ. (2008). Introduction: Special issue on knowledge and use of the lexicon in French as a second language. Journal of French Language Studies, 18(3), 269–276.
89.
TschirnerE. (2004). Breadth of vocabulary and advanced English study: An empirical investigation. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 27–39.
90.
UchiharaT.EguchiM.ClentonJ. (2022). The contribution of guessing from context and dictionary use to receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/13621688221122138
91.
WaringR.NationP. (2004). Second language reading and incidental vocabulary learning. Angles on the English Speaking World, 4(1), 11–23.
92.
WebbS. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 33–52.
93.
WebbS. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 79–95.
94.
WebbS. (2015). Extensive viewing: language learning through watching television. In D. NunanRichardsJ.C. (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 159–168). Routledge.
95.
WebbS. (Ed.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies. Routledge.
96.
WebbS.A.SasaoY. (2013). New directions in vocabulary testing. Language Testing, 44, 263–277.
97.
WiddowsonH.G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford University Press.
98.
ZhaoT.MacaroE. (2016). What works better for the learning of concrete and abstract words: Teachers’ L1 use or L2-only explanations?International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26, 75–98.
99.
ZhangD. (2012). Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling study. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 558–575.
100.
ZhangD.KodaK. (2013). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension in a foreign language: A study of young Chinese EFL learners. System, 41, 901–913.
101.
ZhongH.F. (2018). The relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A perspective from vocabulary use in sentence writing. The Language Learning Journal, 46, 357–370.
102.
ZhongH.F.HirshD. (2009). Vocabulary growth in an English as a foreign language context. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 4, 85–113.
103.
ZourouK. (2012). On the attractiveness of social media for language learning: A look at the state of the art. ALSIC – Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de Communication, 15(1).
