This study investigates the engagement of young people in foreign language learning. Specifically, engagement is defined as a metaconstruct consisting of the following components: cognitive, emotional, and social. An attempt was made to quantify these individual engagement components within task-based and communicative-oriented lessons. We employed electrocardiographic and accelerometric measurements to monitor learners’ physiological responses to engagement during regular German classes. The second part of the project was a questionnaire-based study measuring the subjective opinions of learners about their engagement. The results of the research support the adoption of a task-based approach. We observed the highest level of engagement during productive tasks, which can serve as a rationale for teachers to increase the number of productive tasks compared to receptive ones. Moreover, including the peer-learning component in the activities appeared to be of considerable importance due to its role in building intrinsic motivation to learn and in stimulating the growth of social competences.
AhmedM.R.A. (2020). The effectiveness of task-based learning approach (TBL) on developing communication skills in English for the Saudi EFL preparatory year students. Educational Sciences, 28, 1–28.
2.
AinleyM. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283–302). Springer.
3.
Al AsmariA.A. (2015). Communicative language teaching in EFL university context: Challenges for teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6, 976.
4.
AliakbariM.JamalvandiB. (2010). The impact of ‘role play’ on fostering EFL learners’ speaking ability: A task-based approach. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14, 15–29.
5.
AnsariD.KönigJ.LeaskM.Tokuhama-EspinosaT. (2017). Developmental cognitive neuroscience: Implications for teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. In GuerrieroS. (Ed.), Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession (pp. 195–222). OECD Publishing.
6.
AronsonE.PatnoeS. (2011). Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method (3rd ed.). Pinter & Martin, Ltd.
7.
BarrotJ. (2017). Implementing task-based language teaching in ESL classrooms. Advanced Science Letters, 23, 944–947.
8.
BohnS. (2012). Physiologische Parameter zur Bewertung der Lernwirksamkeit von Lernsituationen [Physiological parameters for evaluating the learning effectiveness of learning situations]. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Ulm, Germany. Open Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm.
9.
BenitezD.S.GaydeckiP.A.ZaidiA.FitzpatrickA.P. (2000). A new QRS detection algorithm based on the Hilbert transform. Computers in Cardiology, 27, 379–382.
10.
BrouwerA.-M.van DamE.van ErpJ.B.SpanglerD.P.BrooksJ.R. (2018). Improving real-life estimates of emotion based on heart rate: A perspective on taking metabolic heart rate into account. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 284.
11.
BygateM.SamudaV. (2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interaction approach. In MackeyA.PolioC (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 96–122). Routledge.
12.
ByrneD. (1976). Teaching oral English: Longman handbooks for language teachers. Longman.
13.
CarlessD.R. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31, 485–500.
14.
Castiblanco JimenezI.A.Gomez AcevedoJ.S.MarcolinF.VezzettiE.MoosS. (2022). Towards an integrated framework to measure user engagement with interactive or physical products. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 17, 45–67.
15.
ChiM.T.H. (2009). Active–constructive–interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105.
16.
ClarkI.DumasG. (2015). Toward a neural basis for peer-interaction: What makes peer-learning tick?Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 28.
17.
ConnellJ.P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span. In CicchettiD. (Ed.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 61–97). University of Chicago Press.
18.
CorcoranR.P.CheungA.C.K.KimE.XieC. (2018). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review, 25, 56–72.
19.
CzikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.
20.
DarnellD.K.KriegP.A. (2019). Student engagement, assessed using heart rate, shows no reset following active learning sessions in lectures. PLoS One, 14, e0225709.
21.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2015). JALT2015 conference article: On emotions in foreign language learning and use. The Language Teacher, 39, 13.
22.
DikkerS.WanL.DavidescoI., et al. (2017). Brain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom. Current Biology, 27, 1375–1380.
23.
DörnyeiZ. (2009). The 2010s communicative language teaching in the 21st century: The ‘principled communicative approach’. Perspectives, 36, 33–43.
24.
DörnyeiZ.KormosJ. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300.
25.
Dos SantosL.M. (2020). The discussion of communicative language teaching approach in language classrooms. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7, 104–109.
26.
DottererA.M.LoweK. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1649–1660.
27.
EarlyM.MarshallS. (2008). Adolescent ESL students’ interpretation and appreciation of literary texts: A case study of multimodality. Canadian Modern Language Review / Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 64, 377–397.
28.
EilersK. (1999). Herzfrequenz und Herzfrequenzvariabilität als Indikatoren psychischer Beanspruchung: Zur Reliabilität und Validität von Herzfrequenz- und Herzfrequenzvariabilitätsmaÿen als Indikatoren psychischer Beanspruchung bei Daueraufmerksamkeitsbelastungen [Heart rate and heart rate variability as indicators of mental stress: On the reliability and validity of heart rate and heart rate variability measures as indicators of mental stress in the case of sustained attention loads]. Published in the series Studien zur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie [Studies on work and organizational psychology], Volume 16. Peter Lang.
29.
ErenA.Rakıcıoğlu-SöylemezA. (2020). Language mindsets, perceived instrumentality, engagement and graded performance in English as a foreign language students. Language Teaching Research, 27, 544–574.
30.
FahrenbergJ. (2001). Physiologische Grundlagen und Meßmethoden der HerzKreislauf-Aktivität [Physiological principles and measurement methods of cardiovascular activity]. In RöslerF. (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie [Encyclopedia of psychology]. Volume 4 (pp. 317–483). Hogrefe.
31.
FahrenbergJ.MyrtekM. (2001). Ambulantes Monitoring und Assessment [Outpatient monitoring and assessment]. In RöslerF. (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie [Encyclopedia of psychology]. Volume 1 (pp. 657–798). Hogrefe.
32.
FahrenbergJ.MyrtekM. (2005). Psychophysiology in labor, Klinik und Alltag: 40 Jahre Projektarbeit der Freiburger Forschungsgruppe Psychophysiologie: Kommentare und neue Perspektiven [Psychophysiology in laboratory, clinic and everyday life: 40 years of project work of the Freiburg Psychophysiology Research Group: Comments and new perspectives]. Published in the series Psychophysiologie in Labor und Feld [Psychophysiology in laboratory and field], Volume 14. Peter Lang.
33.
FahrenbergJ.WalschburgerP.FoersterF.MyrtekM.MüllerW. (1979). Psychophysiologische Aktivierungsforschung: Ein Beitrag zu den Grundlagen der multivariaten Emotions- und Stresstheorie [Psychophysiological activation research: A contribution to the foundations of multivariate emotion and stress theory]. Minerva.
34.
FengE.HongG. (2022). Engagement mediates the relationship between emotion and achievement of Chinese EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 895594.
35.
FinnJ.D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. National Center for Education Statistics.
36.
FinnJ.D.PannozzoG.M.VoelklK.E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive: Withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. Elementary School Journal, 95, 421–454.
37.
FinnJ.D.RockD.A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234.
38.
FinnJ.D.ZimmerK.S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 91–131). Springer.
39.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.FriedelJ.ParisA. (2005). School engagement. In MooreK.A.LippmanL (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305–321). Springer.
40.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.ParisA. (2004). School engagement: Potential of concept: State of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–119.
41.
FredricksJ.A.ReschlyA.L.ChristensonS.L. (2019). Interventions for student engagement: Overview and state of the field. In ReschlyA.L.ChristensonS.L.FredricksJ.A (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions (pp. 1–11). Elsevier.
42.
HarmerJ. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. 4th edition.Longman.
43.
HelmeS.ClarkeD. (2001). Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13, 133–153.
44.
HenryA.ThorsenC. (2018). Disaffection and agentic engagement: ‘Redesigning’ activities to enable authentic self-expression. Language Teaching Research, 24, 456–475.
45.
HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H.MercerS (Eds.). (2020). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters.
46.
HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H.VittaJ.P.WuJ. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 24 March 2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211001289
47.
HottenrottK. (2009). Viertes Internationales Symposium Herzfrequenzvariabilität [Fourth international heart rate variability symposium]. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin, 60, 17–30.
48.
HuL.-t.BentlerP.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
49.
HuY.PanY.ShiX.CaiQ.LiX.ChengX. (2018). Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making. Biological Psychology, 133, 54–62.
50.
JanowskaI. (2011). Podejście zadaniowe do nauczania i uczenia się języków obcych: Na przykładzie języka polskiego jako obcego [A task-based approach to language teaching and learning]. Universitas.
51.
JuF.A. (2013). Communicative language teaching (CLT): A critical and comparative perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, 1579.
52.
KhajavyG.H. (2021). Modeling the relations between foreign language engagement, emotions, grit and reading achievement. In HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H.MercerS (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 241–259). Multilingual Matters.
53.
KrillA.L.PlatekS.M. (2012). Working together may be better: Activation of reward centers during a cooperative maze task. PLoS One, 7, e30613.
54.
Ladino NocuaA.C.Cruz GonzalezJ.P.Castiblanco JimenezI.A.Gomez AcevedoJ.S.MarcolinF.VezzettiE. (2021). Assessment of cognitive student engagement using heart rate data in distance learning during COVID-19. Education Sciences, 11, 540.
55.
LambertC.PhilpJ.NakamuraS. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21, 665–680.
56.
Lucas-OlivaI.Toledo-VegaG.Núñez-RománF. (2022). From neurodidactics to language teaching and learning: The emotional approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12, 1457–1467.
57.
MantaS. (2013). The relationship between PPP and TBLT: Reference to a specific task and ways of assessment. American International Journal of Social Science, 2, 40–48.
58.
MayerM. (2011). Emotionale Beanspruchung von Schülern während der Schulzeit und in der Freizeit unter Berücksichtigung des Medienverhaltens: Eine psychophysiologische Feldstudie [Emotional stress on students during school and leisure time, taking media behavior into account: A psychophysiological field study]. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Ulm, Germany.
59.
MenekseM.StumpG.S.KrauseS.ChiM.T.H. (2013). Differentiated overt learning activities for effective instruction in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 346–374.
60.
MoranskiK.TothP. (2016). Small-group meta-analytic talk and Spanish L2 development. In SatoM.BallingerS. (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 291–316). John Benjamins.
61.
MyrtekM. (2004). Heart and emotion: Ambulatory monitoring studies in everyday life. Hogrefe & Huber.
62.
MyrtekM.AschenbrennerE.BrügnerG. (2005). Emotions in everyday life: An ambulatory monitoring study with female students. Biological Psychology, 68, 237–255.
63.
MyrtekM.FoersterF. (2003). Freiburg Monitoring System (FMS). In HockeyG.R.J.GaillardA.W.K.BurovO (Eds.), Operator functional state: The assessment and prediction of human performance degradation in complex tasks (pp. 107–120). IOS Press.
64.
MyrtekM.FoersterF.BrügnerG. (2001). Freiburger Monitoring System (FMS): Ein Daten-Aufnahme- und Auswertungs-System für Untersuchungen im Alltag [Freiburg Monitoring System (FMS): A data recording and analysis system for investigations in everyday life]. Published in the series Psychophysiologie in Labor und Feld [Psychophysiology in laboratory and field], Volume 9. Peter Lang.
65.
NewmannF. (1992). Higher-order thinking and prospects for classroom thoughtfulness. In NewmannF. (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 62–91). Teachers College Press.
66.
NewmannF.WehlageG.G.LambornS.D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In NewmannF. (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). Teachers College Press.
67.
NunanD. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
68.
Oga-BaldwinW.Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 102128.
69.
OxfordR.L. (2015). Emotion as the amplifier and the primary motive: Some theories of emotion with relevance to language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 371–393.
70.
PekrunR.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). Springer.
71.
PlattE.BrooksF.B. (2002). Task engagement: A turning point in foreign language development. Language Learning, 52, 365–400.
72.
PhilpJ.DuchesneS. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72.
73.
ReeveJ.LeeW. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 527–540.
74.
ReschlyA.L.ChristensonS.L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer.
75.
ReschlyA.L.HuebnerE.S.AppletonJ.J.AntaramianS. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents’ engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 419–431.
76.
SakaiyaS.ShiraitoY.KatoJ.IdeH.OkadaK.TakanoK.KansakuK. (2013). Neural correlate of human reciprocity in social interactions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 239.
77.
SangY.HiverP. (2021). Engagement and companion constructs in language learning: Conceptualizing learners’ involvement in the L2 classroom. In HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H.MercerS (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 17–37). Multilingual Matters.
78.
SarganasG.RosarioA.S.NeuhauserH.K. (2017). Resting heart rate percentiles and associated factors in children and adolescents. The Journal of Pediatrics, 187, 174–181.
79.
SatoM.BallingerS. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21, 157–179.
80.
SchunkD.H.MullenC.A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In ChristensonS.L.ReschlyA.L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219–236). Springer.
81.
ScriminS.PatronE.RuliE.PaguiC.E.K.AltoèG.MasonL. (2018). Dynamic psychophysiological correlates of a learning from text episode in relation to reading goals. Learning and Instruction, 54, 1–10.
82.
SenthilS.WongM.L. (2017). Measuring students’ engagement using wireless heart rate sensors. In International Conference on Smart Technologies for Smart Nation (SmartTechCon), Bengaluru, India. IEEE, pp. 699–704.
83.
SholehM.B. (2020). Implementation of task-based learning in teaching English in Indonesia: Benefits and problems. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 15, 1–9.
84.
SkinnerE.A.BelmontM.J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.
85.
SkinnerE.A.KindermannT.A.FurrerC.J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.
86.
SkinnerE.A.PitzerJ.R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In ChristensonS.ReschlyA.L.WylieC (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–45). Springer.
87.
SousaD.A. (2021). Neuroscience research: Support for social–emotional and cognitive learning. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 57, 6–10.
88.
StorchN. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95–114.
89.
StrebJ.KeisO.LauM.HilleK.SpitzerM.Sosic-VasicZ. (2015). Emotional engagement in kindergarten and school children: A self-determination theory perspective. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4, 102–107.
90.
SulisG.PhilpJ. (2021). Exploring connections between classroom environment and engagement in the foreign language classroom. In HiverP.Al-HoorieA.MercerS. (Ed.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 101–119). Multilingual Matters.
91.
SzymanskiC.PesquitaA.BrennanA.A.PerdikisD.EnnsJ.T.BrickT.R.MüllerV.LindenbergerU. (2017). Teams on the same wavelength perform better: Inter-brain phase synchronization constitutes a neural substrate for social facilitation. NeuroImage, 152, 425–436.
92.
SvalbergA. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18, 242–258.
93.
SvalbergA.M. (2021). Engagement with language in relation to form-focused versus meaning-focused teaching and learning. In HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H.MercerS (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 38–55). Multilingual Matters.
94.
TothP.D.WagnerE.MoranskiK. (2013). ‘Co-constructing’ explicit L2 knowledge with high school Spanish learners through guided induction. Applied Linguistics, 34, 279–303.
95.
Van den BrandenK. (2006). Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In BrandenK. (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 1–16). Cambridge University Press.
96.
Van den BrandenK. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164–181.
97.
WagnerM. (2012). Der Einfluss emotionaler, kognitiver und körperlicher Beanspruchung auf die Herzrate bei Jugendlichen: Eine Laborstudie [The influence of emotional, cognitive, and physical stress on heart rate in adolescents: A laboratory study]. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Ulm, Germany. Open Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm.
98.
WillisJ. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
99.
ZhengX.BorgS. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18, 205–221.
