The foreign-accentedness,comprehensibility,and intelligibility of L2 Arabic speech

Abstract

This study investigated foreign-accentedness, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in second language (L2) Arabic speech. More specifically, it was designed to 1) measure how foreign-accented, comprehensible, and intelligible L2 Arabic speech was, 2) explain the relationships among those three global aspects, and 3) determine the extent to which foreign-accentedness and comprehensibility – individually or combined – explain or predict intelligibility. Thirty adult L2 Arabic speakers were audio-recorded while having an unofficial oral proficiency interview (OPI). A subset of three speech samples were extracted from the entire OPI for each speaker. Next, 10 adult native speakers of Arabic listened to and transcribed all speech samples in Arabic as a measure of intelligibility; in addition, they rated the samples for foreign-accentedness and comprehensibility on a 9-point scale. Results showed that L2 Arabic speech was rated more positively for comprehensibility than for foreign-accentedness, on average; in addition, most of it was less than highly intelligible. Also, results showed statistically significant relationships among the three global aspects under investigation, although they varied in strength: foreign-accentedness and comprehensibility showed the strongest relationship, followed with comprehensibility and intelligibility; foreign-accentedness and intelligibility was found to have the weakest relationship. Furthermore, foreign-accentedness and comprehensibility demonstrated a statistically significant explanatory or predictive power in intelligibility. However, both the unique contribution and added power of foreign-accentedness were not statistically significant, deeming a model with only comprehensibility being the best fit for the obtained assessment data of L2 Arabic speech. Consistent with existing evidence, the results support the partial independence of foreign-accentedness, comprehensibility, and intelligibility as global aspects of L2 speech while also indicating L2-specific patterns. After discussing the results and implications, directions for future research are provided.

Keywords

Arabic as a foreign language comprehensibility foreign-accentedness intelligibility L2 Arabic L2 speech assessment L2 speech perception oral proficiency interview (OPI)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. ACTFL.

Audacity Team. (2020). Audacity^®: Version 2.3.2 [audio editor and recorder]. Audacity. Available at: http://audacityteam.org (accessed February 2023).

Boersma

Weenink

(2019). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.06, retrieved November 12, 2021 from http://www.praat.org/

Crowther

(2020). Rating L2 speaker comprehensibility on monologic vs. interactive tasks: What is the effect of speaking task type? Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6, 96–121.

Crowther

Trofimovich

Isaacs

Saito

(2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99, 80–95.

Crowther

Trofimovich

Saito

Isaacs

(2015). Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 814–837.

Derwing

T.M.

Munro

M.J.

(1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1–16.

Derwing

T.M.

Munro

M.J.

Thomson

R.I.

(2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29, 359–380.

Field

(2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

10.

Flege

J.E.

Munro

M.J.

MacKay

I.R.A.

(1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.

11.

González-Bueno

(1997). Voice-onset-time in the perception of foreign accent by native Spanish listeners. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 35, 251–268.

12.

Hayes-Harb

Watzinger-Tharp

(2012). Accent, intelligibility, and the role of the Listener: Perceptions of English-accented German by native German speakers. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 260–282.

13.

Huensch

Nagle

(2021). The effect of speaker proficiency on intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: A conceptual replication and extension of Munro and Derwing (1995a). Language Learning, 71, 626–668.

14.

Isaacs

(2018). Shifting sands in second language pronunciation teaching and assessment research and practice. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15, 273–293.

15.

Isaacs

Trofimovich

(2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505.

16.

Jułkowska

I.A.

Cebrian

(2015). Effects of listener factors and stimulus properties on the intelligibility, comprehensibility and accentedness of L2 speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1, 211–237.

17.

Kang

Thomson

R.I.

Moran

(2018). Empirical approaches to measuring the intelligibility of different varieties of English in predicting listener comprehension. Language Learning, 68, 115–146.

18.

Larson-Hall

Plonsky

(2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65, 127–159.

19.

Levis

(2020). Revisiting the intelligibility and nativeness principles. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6, 310–328.

20.

Levis

J.M.

(2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 369–377.

21.

Levis

J.M.

(2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.

22.

Levis

Barriuso

T.A.

(2011). Nonnative speakers’ pronunciation errors in spoken and read English. Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Proceedings, 3(1).

23.

Munro

M.J.

Derwing

T.M.

(1995a). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97.

24.

Munro

M.J.

Derwing

T.M.

(1995b). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306.

25.

Munro

M.J.

Derwing

T.M.

(2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34, 520–531.

26.

Munro

M.J.

Derwing

T.M.

(2015). A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century: A point of view. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1, 11–42.

27.

Munro

M.J.

Derwing

T.M.

(2019). Collecting data in L2 pronunciation research. Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Proceedings, 11(1).

28.

Munro

M.J.

Derwing

T.M.

(2020). Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility, redux. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6, 283–309.

29.

Munro

M.J.

Derwing

T.M.

Thomson

R.I.

(2015). Setting segmental priorities for English learners: Evidence from a longitudinal study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 39–60.

30.

O’Brien

M.G.

(2016). Methodological choices in rating speech samples. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 587–605.

31.

Plonsky

Ghanbar

(2018). Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 713–731.

32.

Plonsky

Oswald

F.L.

(2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.

33.

Saito

(2021). What characterizes comprehensible and native-like pronunciation among English-as-a-second-language speakers? Meta-analyses of phonological, rater, and instructional factors. TESOL Quarterly, 55, 866–900.

34.

Saito

Plonsky

(2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69, 652–708.

35.

Saito

Trofimovich

Isaacs

(2017). Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization Study. Applied Linguistics, 38, 439–462.

36.

Thomson

. (2017). Measurement of accentedness, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. In Kang

Ginther

(Eds.), Assessment in second language pronunciation (pp. 11–29). Routledge.

37.

Trofimovich

Isaacs

(2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916. DOI:10.1017/S1366728912000168