This qualitative study aimed to explore the perceptions of 12 international English teachers (from the UK, the USA, Australia, Indonesia, and the Philippines at four universities in Thailand) towards World Englishes (WE), Thai English (TE), and the feasibility of incorporating WE into English language teaching (ELT) classrooms. Based on semi-structured interviews and qualitative content analysis, findings revealed that the participants demonstrated positive views and did not deny the existence of WE and TE, although their rules, vocabularies, pronunciations, and accents diverge from British English (BrE) and American English (AmE). Furthermore, the participants regarded different English varieties as symbols and representations that reflect users’ cultural and national identities. For implementations in ELT, while the majority disapproved, valued unequally, marginalized, and questioned the legitimacy of WE, others viewed that allowing learners to experience English diversity would be a sound preparation for changes in English linguistic landscapes and the realistic use of today’s English.
AhnH. (2015). Awareness of and attitudes to Asian Englishes: A study of English teachers in South Korea. Asian Englishes, 17, 132–151.
2.
AkkakosonS. (2019). Thai language learners’ sense of English ownership. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 58, 235–263.
3.
AtesB.EslamiZ.R.WrightK.L. (2015). Incorporating World Englishes into undergraduate ESL education courses. World Englishes, 34, 485–501.
4.
BakerW. (2009). The cultures of English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 567–592.
5.
BakerW. (2012). English as a lingua franca in Thailand: Characterisations and implications. Englishes in Practice, 1, 18–27.
6.
BakerW. (2017). English language policy in Thailand. European Journal of Language Policy, 9, 27–44.
7.
BakerW.IshikawaT. (2021). Transcultural communication through Global Englishes: An advanced textbook for students. Routledge.
8.
BennuiP. (2017). Speaking Tinglish for professional communication: A reflection of Thai English used by tour guides along the Andaman sea. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences. Humanities, and Arts, 17, 233–266.
9.
BernardoA.S. (2014). Changing and changed stance toward norm selection in Philippine universities: Its pedagogical implications. Journal on English Language Teaching, 4, 26–37.
10.
BlairA. (2015). Evolving a post-native, multilingual model for ELF-aware teacher education. In BayyurtY.AkcanS. (Eds.), Current perspectives on pedagogy for English as a lingua franca (pp. 89–102). Berlin / Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.
11.
BoonsukY. (2021). Which English should we stand for? Voices from lecturers in Thai multicultural universities. RELC Journal. Epub ahead of print 15November2021. DOI: 10.1177/00336882211054650
12.
BoonsukY.WasohF.AmbeleE.A. (2022). Global Englishes pedagogical activities for English-as-a-foreign language settings and beyond: Understanding Thai teachers’ practices. RELC Journal. Epub ahead of print 14July2022. DOI: 10.1177/00336882221112193
13.
BuripakdiA. (2008). Thai English as discourse of exclusion and resistance: Perspectives of Thai professional writers on the notion of Thai English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
14.
BuripakdiA. (2012a). On professional writing: Thai writers’ views on their English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 245–264.
15.
BuripakdiA. (2012b). The marginalized positions of Thai professional writers on the global hegemony of English. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 22, 41–59.
16.
ChamcharatsriP.B. (2013). Perception of Thai English. Journal of English as an International Language, 8, 21–36.
17.
ChoiJ. (2016). ‘Speaking English naturally’: The language ideologies of English as an official language at a Korean university. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37, 783–793.
18.
CreswellJ.W.Plano ClarkV.P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
19.
D’AngeloJ. (2012). WE-informed EIL curriculum at Chukyo: Towards a functional, educated, multilingual outcome. In MatsudaA. (Ed.), Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language (pp. 121–139). Multilingual Matters.
20.
DeweyM. (2015). Time to wake up some dogs! Shifting the culture of language in ELT. In BayyurtY.AkcanS. (Eds.), Current perspectives on pedagogy for English as a lingua franca (pp. 121–134). Berlin / Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.
21.
DewiA. (2014). Perception of English: A study of staff and students at universities in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
22.
DewiA. (2017). The English(es) to teach after study and life in Australia: A study of Indonesian English language educators. Asian Englishes, 19, 128–147.
23.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
24.
FangF.RenW. (2018). Developing students’ awareness of Global Englishes. ELT Journal, 72, 384–394.
25.
FangF.WidodoH.P. (Eds.). (2019). Critical perspectives on Global Englishes in Asia: Language policy, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Multilingual Matters.
26.
GallowayN.RoseH. (2014). Using listening journals to raise awareness of Global Englishes in ELT. ELT Journal, 68, 386–396.
27.
GallowayN.RoseH. (2015). Introducing global Englishes. Routledge.
28.
GallowayN.RoseH. (2018). Incorporating Global Englishes into the ELT classroom. ELT Journal, 72, 3–14.
29.
JaroensakT.SaraceniM. (2019). ELF in Thailand: Variants and coinage in spoken ELF in tourism encounters. rEFLections, 26, 115–133.
30.
JenkinsJ. (2009). World Englishes. 2nd edition.Routledge.
31.
JenkinsJ. (2015). Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice, 2, 49–85.
32.
JenkinsJ.LeungC. (2019). From mythical ‘standard’ to standard reality: The need for alternatives to standardized English language tests. Language Teaching, 52, 86–110.
33.
JindapitakN. (2019). English as an ASEAN lingua franca and the role of nativeness in English education in Thailand. English Today, 35, 36–41.
34.
JindapitakN.TeoA. (2012). Thai tertiary English majors’ attitudes towards and awareness of World Englishes. Journal of English Studies, 7, 74–116.
35.
JindapitakN.TeoA.SavskiK. (2022). Bringing Global Englishes to the ELT classroom: English language learners’ reflections. Asian Englishes, 24, 279–293.
36.
KachruB.B. (Ed.). (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. University of Illinois Press.
37.
KachruY. (2009). Academic writing in World Englishes: The Asian context. In MurataK.JenkinsJ. (Eds.), Global Englishes in Asian contexts (pp. 111–130). Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
KirkpatrickA. (2018). From EFL to ELF: The time is right. In ZeinS. (Ed.), Teacher education for English as a lingua franca: Perspectives from Indonesia (pp. 191–203). Routledge.
39.
KirkpatrickA.SussexR. (Eds.). (2012). English as an international language in Asia: Implications for language education. Springer.
40.
KusumaningputriR. (2020). Exposure to Englishes in listening classrooms: The perspectives of Indonesian ESL learners. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 7, 49–68.
41.
LewinsA.SilverC. (2007). Using software in qualitative research. London: Sage.
42.
ManaraC. (2016). ‘No need-lah, Uncle’: Teachers’ perspective on English(es) communication and pedagogy. International Journal of Culture and History, 2, 9–14.
43.
MatsudaA. (2003). Incorporating World Englishes in teaching English as an international language. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 719–729.
44.
McKayS.L.BrownJ.D. (2016). Teaching and assessing EIL in local contexts around the world. Routledge.
45.
ModianoM. (2009). EIL, native-speakerism and the failure of European ELT. In SharifianF. (Ed.), English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues (pp. 58–78). Multilingual Matters.
46.
NguyenM.X.N.C. (2017). TESOL teachers’ engagement with the native speaker model: How does teacher education impact on their beliefs?RELC Journal, 48, 83–98.
47.
PakirA. (2010). Current research on Englishes in Southeast Asia. World Englishes, 29, 329–335.
48.
PassakornkarnS.VibulpholJ. (2020). Development of World Englishes-based listening materials to raise the awareness of the varieties of English for Thai EFL upper secondary school students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13, 225–246.
49.
PhuengpitipornchaiK.TeoA. (2021). You understand I Na Ka?: A study of comprehensibility of Thai English to foreign tourists. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 61, 1–32.
50.
PrabjandeeD.FangF. (2022). ‘I was like, just wow!’: Insights from Global Englishes teacher professional development. Asian Englishes, 24, 294–311.
51.
Rajani Na AyuthayaJ.SitthitikulP. (2016). World Englishes-based lessons: Their effects on anxiety and language achievement of Thai tertiary students. Arab World English Journal, 7, 201–223.
52.
RajprasitK. (2021). ‘Do as WE Do’: Teaching World Englishes in a general English course to Thai students. RELC Journal. Epub ahead of print 26June2021. DOI: 10.1177/00336882211011276
53.
RajprasitK.MarlinaR. (2019). An attempt to raise Thai students’ awareness of World Englishes in a General English program. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 14, 19–34.
54.
RenW. (2014). Can the expanding circle own English? Comments on Yoo’s ‘nonnative teachers in the expanding circle and the ownership of English’. Applied Linguistics, 35, 208–212.
55.
RogersU. (2013). Thai English as a variety. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
56.
RoseH. (2017). A global approach to English language teaching: Integrating an international perspective into a teaching methods course. In MatsudaA. (Ed.), Preparing teachers to teach English as an international language (pp. 169–180). Multilingual Matters.
57.
RoseH.GallowayN. (2017). Debating standard language ideology in the classroom: Using the ‘Speak Good English Movement’ to raise awareness of global Englishes. RELC Journal, 48, 294–301.
58.
RoseH.GallowayN. (2019). Global Englishes for language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
59.
RoseH.McKinleyJ.GallowayN. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language Teaching, 54, 157–189.
60.
SadeghpourM.SharifianF. (2017). English language teachers’ perceptions of World Englishes: The elephants in the room. Asian Englishes, 19, 242–258.
61.
SaengboonS. (2015). An exploratory study of Thai university students’ understanding of World Englishes. English Language Teaching, 8, 131–154.
62.
SameephetB. (2020). On the fluidity of languages: A way out of the dilemma in English medium instruction classrooms in Thailand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
63.
SchneiderE.W. (2014). Asian Englishes–into the future: A bird’s eye view. Asian Englishes, 16, 249–256.
64.
SeidlhoferB. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 133–158.
65.
SeidlhoferB. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.
66.
SelviA.F. (2019). Qualitative content analysis. In McKinleyJ.RoseH. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 440–452). Routledge.
67.
SifakisN.C. (2019). ELF awareness in English language teaching: Principles and process. Applied Linguistics, 40, 288–306.
68.
SnodinN.S. (2014). English naming and code-mixing in Thai mass media. World Englishes, 33, 100–111.
69.
SnodinN.S.YoungT.J. (2015). ‘Native-speaker’ varieties of English: Thai perceptions and attitudes. Asian Englishes, 17, 248–260.
70.
TanM. (2005). Authentic language or language errors? Lessons from a learner corpus. ELT Journal, 59, 126–134.
71.
TanakaF. (2014). A survey-based of Japanese university student attitudes toward EIL and implications for the future of English education in Japan. Asian Englishes, 13, 48–71.
72.
TangK.N. (2020). Challenges and importance of teaching English as a medium of instruction in Thailand International College. Journal of English as an International Language, 15, 97–118.
73.
TantiniranatS. (2019). Stars and stripes and union jack: Exploring the presence of native-speaker cultures in an English major program. Journal of Language and Culture, 38, 202–221.
74.
TarrayoV.N.UllaM.B.LekwilaiP. (2021a). Perceptions toward Thai English: A study of university English language teachers in Thailand. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18, 374–397.
75.
TarrayoV.N.UllaM.B.LekwilaiP. (2021b). Does Thai English exist? Voices from English language teachers in two Thai universities. Asian Englishes, 23, 280–293.
76.
TroyerR. (2012). English in the Thai linguistic netscape. World Englishes, 31, 93–112.
77.
TupasR.WeningerC. (2022). Mapping out unequal Englishes in English-medium classrooms. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 21, 347–361.
78.
WatkhaolarmP. (2005). Think in Thai, write in English: Thainess in Thai English literature. World Englishes, 24, 145–158.
79.
WiddowsonH.G. (2015). ELF and the pragmatics of language variation. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 4, 359–372.
XiongT.YuanZ. (2018). ‘It was because I could speak English that I got the job’: Neoliberal discourse in a Chinese English textbook series. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 17, 103–117.
82.
ZeinS. (2018). From EFL to ELF: Implications for teacher education. In ZeinS. (Ed.), Teacher education for English as a lingua franca: Perspectives from Indonesia (pp. 21–40). Routledge.
