Collocational knowledge is central to communicative competence, but many second language (L2) learners struggle to acquire this aspect. To address this limitation, the present study investigated if textual enhancement and frequency manipulation would affect incidental learning of collocations from reading. Fifty-four first language (L1) Cantonese speakers read two English stories in which 12 adjective–pseudonoun collocations appeared either three or six times. The target collocations were coloured in red under the enhanced condition. Participants’ attentional processes were examined using their eye-movements during reading and stimulated recall comments prompted by their own eye-movements. After reading, unannounced immediate and delayed posttests were administered. The results showed that increased frequency led to greater visual attention to the target collocations in terms of both duration and counts of eye-fixations. Increased frequency further led to better performances on the immediate form and collocation recognition tests. The effects of colouring increased first fixation durations, only when the target collocations appeared six times. Colouring was also linked to higher immediate collocation recognition and delayed meaning recognition and collocation recall scores. Stimulated recall comments revealed that participants noticed the pseudonouns and sometimes utilized their collocate adjectives to infer the meaning of the pseudonouns. The findings of this study demonstrate that textual enhancement and frequency manipulation may affect distinct aspects of collocational learning.
BaayenR.H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge University Press.
2.
BarrD.J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH.J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
3.
BoersF.LindstrombergS. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BoersF.DemecheleerM.CoxheadA.WebbS. (2014). Gauging the effects of exercises on verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 54–74.
5.
BoersF.EyckmansJ.KappelJ.StengersH.DemecheleerH. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10, 245–261.
6.
BoersF.DemecheleerM.HeL.DeconinckJ.StengersH.EyckmansJ. (2017). Tyopographic enhancement of multiword units in second language text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27, 448–469.
7.
BybeeJ.L. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733.
8.
CarrolG.ConklinK. (2020). Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences. Language and Speech, 63, 95–122.
9.
ChangY.ChoiS. (2014). Effects of seductive details evidenced by gaze duration. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 109, 131–138.
10.
ChoiS (2017) Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21, 403–426.
11.
ChunE.ChoiS.KimJ. (2012). The effect of extensive reading and paired-associate learning on long-term vocabulary retention: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 521, 125–129.
12.
ChungY.RévészA. (2021). Investigating the effect of textual enhancement in post-reading tasks on grammatical development by child language learners. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 7May2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211005068.
13.
ConklinK.SchmittN. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?Applied Linguistics, 29, 72–89.
14.
ConklinK.Pellicer-SanchezA.CarrolG. (2018). Eye-tracking: A guide for applied linguistics research. Cambridge University Press.
15.
CowanN. (1995). Attention and memory. Oxford University Press.
16.
CowieA.P. (1981). The treatment of collocations and idioms in learners’ dictionaries. Applied Linguistics, 2, 223–235.
17.
CunningsI.SturtP. (2014). Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 117–139.
18.
DurrantP.SchmittN. (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26, 163–188.
19.
d’YdewalleG.De BruyckerW. (2007). Eye movements of children and adults while reading television subtitles. European Psychologist: The Journal for Psychology in Europe, 12, 196–205.
20.
EllisN.OgdenD. (2017). Thinking about multiword constructions: Usage-based approaches to acquisition and processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 604–620.
21.
EllisR. (2015). Form-focused instruction and the measurements of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In RebuschatP. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 417–442). John Benjamins.
22.
GassS.M.MackeyA. (2016). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. New York.
23.
GeorgescuA.L.KuzmanovicB.SchilbachL., et al. (2013). Neural correlates of ‘social gaze’ processing in high-functioning autism under systematic variation of gaze duration. Neuroimage: Clinical, 3, 340–351.
24.
GodfroidA. (2019). Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A research synthesis and methodological guide. Routledge.
25.
GodfroidA.BoersF.HousenA. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517.
26.
GodfroidA.AhnJ.ChoiI., et al. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 563–584.
27.
HanZ.ParkE.S.CombsC. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29, 597–618.
28.
HarrellF.E.DupontC. (2015). Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous: R package version 3.17-0. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc (accessed September 2022).
29.
HoeyM. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.
30.
JungJ. (2016). Effects of glosses on learning of L2 grammar and vocabulary. Language Teaching Research, 20, 92–112.
31.
JungJ.LeeM. (2022). Second language reading and recall processes under different reading purposes: An eye-tracking, keystroke-logging, and stimulated recall study. Language Awareness. Epub ahead of print 27May2022. DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2022.2069251.
32.
JungJ.RévészA. (2018). The effects of reading activity characteristics on L2 reading processes and noticing of glossed constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 755–780.
33.
LauferB.Aviad-LevitzkyT. (2017). What type of vocabulary knowledge predicts reading comprehension: word meaning recall or word meaning recognition?The Modern Language Journal, 101, 729–741.
34.
LauferB.GirsaiN. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694–716.
35.
LeeM.JungJ. (2021). Effects of textual enhancement and task manipulation on L2 learners’ attentional processes and grammatical knowledge development: A mixed methods study. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 23July2021. DOI: 10.1177/13621688211034640.
36.
LeeM.RévészA. (2018). Promoting grammatical development through textually enhanced captions: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 557–577.
37.
LeowR.P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge.
38.
LeubeA.RifaiK.RifaiK. (2017). Sampling rate influences saccade detection in mobile eye tracking of a reading task. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 10(3).
39.
LinckJ.A.CunningsI. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65, 185–207.
40.
LysterR.MoriH. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.
41.
MajuddinE.Siyanova-ChanturiaA.BoersF. (2021). Incidental acquisition of multiword expression through audiovisual materials: The role of repetition and typographic enhancement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Epub ahead of print 15March2021. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263121000036.
42.
NationI.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
43.
NorouzianR.PlonskyL. (2018). Eta-and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34, 257–271.
44.
NorthbrookJ.ConklinK. (2019). Is what you put in what you get out?: Textbook-derived lexical bundles processing in beginner English learners. Applied Linguistics, 40, 816–833.
45.
NorthbrookJ.AllenD.ConklinK. (2022). ‘Did you see that?’: The role of repetition and enhancement on lexical bundle processing in English learning materials. Applied Linguistics, 43, 453–472.
46.
Pellicer-SanchezA. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130.
47.
Pellicer-SanchezA. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21, 381–402.
48.
Pellicer-SánchezA. (2020). Expanding English vocabulary knowledge through reading: Insights from eye-tracking studies. RELC Journal, 51, 134–146.
49.
PetersE. (2009). Learning collocations through attention-drawing techniques: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. In BarfieldA.GyllstadH. (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple interpretations (pp. 194–207). Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
PetersE. (2012). Learning German formulaic sequences: The effect of two attention-drawing techniques. Language Learning Journal, 40, 65–79.
51.
PetersE. (2014). The effects of repetition and time of post-test administration on EFL learners’ form recall of single words and collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 75–94.
52.
PetersE. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20, 113–138.
53.
PuimѐgeE.Montero PerezM.PetersE. (2021). Promoting L2 acquisition of multiword units through textually enhanced audiovisual input: An eye-tracking study. Second Language Research. Epub ahead of print 11October2021. DOI: 10.1177/02676583211049741.
54.
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed October 2022).
55.
RaneyG.E.CampbellS.J.BoveeJ.C. (2014). Using eye movements to evaluate the cognitive processes involved in text comprehension. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 83, e50780.
56.
SagarraN.HansonA.S. (2011). Eyetracking methodology: A user’s guide for linguistic research. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 4, 543−555.
57.
SaitoK. (2020). Multi- or single-word units? The role of collocation use in comprehensible and contextually appropriate second language speech. Language Learning, 70, 548–588.
58.
SchmittN.SchmittD.ClaphamC. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.
59.
ShabaniG.RahimyR. (2020). An investigation of the effectiveness of enhancing input through glossing and skewing techniques on knowledge of lexical collocation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49, 1011–1025.
60.
Sharwood SmithM. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.
61.
ShinD.NationP. (2008). Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English. ELT Journal, 62, 339–348.
62.
SiyanovaA.SchmittN. (2008). L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 429–258.
63.
SonbulS.SchmittN. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63, 121–159.
64.
SzudarskiP. (2012). Effects of meaning- and formed-focused instruction on the acquisition of verb–noun collocations in L2 English. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 1, 3–37.
65.
SzudarskiP.CarterR. (2016). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26, 245–265.
66.
SzudarskiP.ConklinK. (2014). Short- and long-term effects of rote rehearsal on ESL learners’ processing of collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 833–842.
67.
TokowiczN.MacWhinneyB. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.
68.
TomaselloM. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
69.
ToomerM.ElgortI. (2019). The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69, 405–439.
70.
TsaiM. (2020). The effects of explicit instruction on L2 learners’ acquisition of verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 24, 138–162.
71.
VanPattenB. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.
72.
VanPattenB. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755–803.
73.
WebbS.KagimotoE. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation and meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 55–77.
74.
WebbS.NewtonJ.ChangA. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63, 91–120.
75.
WilliamsJ.N. (2009). Implicit learning in second language acquisition. In RitchieW.C.BhatiaT.K. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319–353). Emerald Group.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
