While numerous studies have shown how native speakerism can negatively affect the professional trajectories of those perceived as ‘non-native speaker’, little is known about the ‘native’ and ‘non-native speaker’ representation among course book authors (CBAs). Therefore, this article aims to analyse the ‘nativeness’, ethnicity and country of origin of general English CBAs to understand to what extent native speakerism affects who is recruited as a CBA. Twenty-eight general English adult course books published globally were analysed and three commissioning editors (CEs) were interviewed. The results show that out of 126 CBAs in the sample, 122 are ‘native speakers’ and 123 are white. In addition, the vast majority (79%) come from the UK. While the CEs confirmed they are committed to equality, it is clear that the current CBA recruitment policies lead to a perpetuation of native speakerism and to a situation where most general English CBAs are white ‘native speakers’ from the UK. It is suggested that greater attention is paid by CEs and publishers to recruiting more diverse CBA teams. As the interviewed CEs confirmed, such greater diversity could lead to more diversity in the content of the books.
AboshihaP. (2015). Rachel’s story: Development of a ‘native speaker’ English language teacher. In SwanA.AboshihaP.HollidayA. (Eds.), (En)countering native-speakerism (pp. 43–58). Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
AslanE.ThompsonA.S. (2016). Are they really ‘two different species’? Implicitly elicited student perceptions about NESTs and NNESTs. TESOL Journal, 8, 277–294.
3.
AtkinsL. (2013). What’s the story? Issues of diversity and children’s publishing in the U.K. E-Rea. Revue Électronique d’études Sur Le Monde Anglophone, 11.1.
4.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2003). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 9873. National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
BhattacharyaU.JiangL.CanagarajahS. (2019). Race, representation, and diversity in the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41, 999–1004.
6.
BrownJ.D. (2014). Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh University Press.
7.
CasadevallA.HandelsmanJ. (2014). The presence of female conveners correlates with a higher proportion of female speakers at scientific symposia. MBio, 5, 1.
8.
CheungL.Y.BraineG. (2007). The attitudes of university students towards non-native speakers English teachers in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 38, 257–277.
9.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK.BellR. (2011). Research methods in education. 7th edition.Routledge.
10.
CreswellJ.W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4 edition. Pearson.
11.
CrystalD. (2019). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. 3rd edition.Cambridge University Press.
12.
DaviesA. (1991). The native speaker in applied linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
13.
DaviesA. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. 2nd edition.Multilingual Matters.
14.
DaviesA. (2012). Native speaker. In ChapelleC.A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Blackwell.
15.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2018). Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker.’Applied Linguistics, 39, 236–240.
16.
DomingoE. (2022). Native-speakerism in the hiring and visual depiction of teachers in recruitment websites of online English schools in Asia. Doctor of philosophy in language education thesis, Saint Louis University, Baguio City, Philippines.
17.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
18.
EdoA.JacquemetN.YannelisC. (2019). Language skills and homophilous hiring discrimination: Evidence from gender and racially differentiated applications. Review of Economics of the Household, 17, 349–376.
19.
EschK.S.V.MothaS.KubotaR. (2020). Race and language teaching. Language Teaching, 53, 391–421.
20.
GelusoJ. (2013). Negotiating a professional identity: Non-Japanese teachers of English in pre-tertiary education in Japan. In HoughtonS.RiversD.J. (Eds.), Native-speakerism in Japan: Intergroup dynamics in foreign language education (pp. 92–104). Multilingual Matters.
21.
GerdayL. (2019). What is ‘global’ in an ELT global coursebook? A linguistic analysis of the New Headway Upper-Intermediate student’s book. English Text Construction, 12, 59–83.
22.
GerullK.M.WahbaM.B.GoldinL.M., et al. (2020). Representation of women in speaking roles at surgical conferences. The American Journal of Surgery, 220, 20–26.
23.
GiulianoL.LevineD.I.LeonardJ. (2009). Manager race and the race of new hires. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 589–631.
24.
HashimotoK. (2013). The construction of the ‘native speaker’ in Japan’s educational policies for TEFL. In HoughtonS.RiversD.J. (Eds.), Native-speakerism in Japan: Intergroup dynamics in foreign language education (pp. 159–168). Multilingual Matters.
HollidayA. (2015). Native-speakerism: Taking the concept forward and achieving cultural belief. In SwanA.AboshihaP.HollidayA. (Eds.), (En)countering native-speakerism (pp. 11–25). Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
HylandK. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69.
28.
JavierE. (2016). ‘Almost’ native speakers: The experiences of visible ethnic-minority native English-speaking teachers. In CoplandF.GartonS.MannS. (Eds.), LETs and NESTs: Voices, views and vignettes. (pp. 227–239). British Council.
29.
JiménezL.BeckertB. (2020). The Diversity Baseline Survey (DBS 2.0). Lee & Low Books.
30.
KelchK.Santana-WilliamsonE. (2002). ESL students’ attitudes toward native- and non-native speaking instructors’ accents. The CATESOL Journal, 14, 57–72.
31.
KelesU.MansouriB.YazanB. (2021). Perpetuation of gender bias in New Headway: A multimodal critical discourse analysis with a diachronic lens. Pedagogy, Culture and Society. Epub ahead of print 7April2021. DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2021.1913442.
32.
KiczkowiakM. (2019). Students’, teachers’ and recruiters’ perception of teaching effectiveness and the importance of nativeness in ELT. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 7, 1–25.
33.
KiczkowiakM. (2020). Recruiters’ attitudes to hiring ‘native’ and ‘non-native speaker’ teachers: An international survey. TESL-EJ: Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 24(1).
34.
KiczkowiakM. (2021). Pronunciation in course books: English as a Lingua Franca perspective. ELT Journal, 75, 55–66.
35.
KiczkowiakM.LoweR.J. (2021). Native-speakerism in English language teaching: ‘Native speakers’ more likely to be invited as conference plenary speakers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Epub ahead of print 6September2021. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2021.1974464.
36.
KiczkowiakM.WuA. (2018). Discrimination and discriminatory practices against NNESTs. In LiontasJ.I. (Ed.), TESOL encyclopaedia of English language teaching. John Wiley.
37.
KubotaR.FujimotoD. (2013). Racialized native speakers: Voices of Japanese American English language professionals. In HoughtonS.RiversD.J. (Eds.), Native-speakerism in Japan: Intergroup dynamics in foreign language education (pp. 196–206). Multilingual Matters.
38.
LevisJ.M.SonsaatS.LinkS. (2017). Students’ beliefs about native vs. non-native pronunciation teachers: Professional challenges and teacher education. In MartinezA.de DiosJ. (Eds.), Native and non-native teachers in English language classrooms (pp. 205–238). De Gruyter Mouton.
39.
LiL.DemszkyD.BromleyP.JurafskyD. (2020). Content analysis of textbooks via natural language processing: Findings on gender, race, and ethnicity in Texas U.S. history textbooks. AERA Open, 6(3).
40.
LoweR.J.KiczkowiakM. (2016). Native-speakerism and the complexity of personal experience: A duoethnographic study. Cogent Education, 3, 1–16.
41.
MahboobA.GoldenR. (2013). Looking for native speakers of English: Discrimination in English language teaching job advertisements. Voices in Asia Journal, 1, 72–81.
42.
MatsudaA. (2012). Teaching materials in EIL. In AlsagoffL.RenandyaW.A.MckayS.L.HuG. (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (Chapter 10). Routledge.
43.
McCarthyM. (2021). Fifty-five years and counting: A half-century of getting it half-right?Language Teaching, 54, 343–354.
44.
McKenzieR.M. (2008). The role of variety recognition in Japanese university students’ attitudes towards English speech varieties. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29, 139–153.
45.
MellitiM. (2013). Global content in global coursebooks: The way issues of inappropriacy, inclusivity, and connectedness are treated in headway intermediate. SAGE Open, 3(4).
46.
MishanF. (2021). The global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella’s slipper?Language Teaching. Epub ahead of print 1March2021. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444820000646.
47.
OreopoulosP.DechiefD. (2012). Why do some employers prefer to interview Matthew, but not Samir? New evidence from Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2018047. Social Science Research Network. Available online: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2018047 (accessed September 2022).
48.
PaikedayT.M. (1985). The native speaker is dead! An informal discussion of a linguistic myth with Noam Chomsky and other linguists, philosophers, psychologists, and lexicographers. Paikeday.
49.
ParsaiyanS.F.GarshasbiK. (2021). Global coursebooks in the course of time: The case of interchange level 2. Issues in Language Teaching, 10, 269–300.
50.
RaiL.DengC. (2016). Glocalisation and English language education in Chinese context. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14, 127–144.
51.
RamptonM.B.H. (1990). Displacing the ‘native speaker’: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44, 97–101.
52.
RiversD.J.RossA.S. (2013). Idealized English teachers: The implicit influence of race in Japan. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 12, 321–339.
53.
RomneyC. (2019). Changes in diversity and inclusion in textbook images over time. JALT Postconference Publication, 2018, 189.
54.
RueckerT.IvesL. (2015). White native English speakers needed: The rhetorical construction of privilege in online teacher recruitment spaces. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 733–756.
55.
SelviA.F. (2010). All teachers are equal, but some teachers are more equal than others: Trend analysis of job advertisements in English language teaching. WATESOL NNEST Caucus Annual Review, 1, 155–181.
56.
ShinJ.EslamiZ.R.ChenW.-C. (2011). Presentation of local and international culture in current international English-language teaching textbooks. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 24, 253–268.
57.
SiJ. (2019). An analysis of business English coursebooks from an ELF perspective. ELT Journal, 74, 156–65.
58.
SyrbeM.RoseH. (2016). An evaluation of the global orientation of English textbooks in Germany. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 152–163.
59.
TajeddinZ.PakzadianM. (2020). Representation of inner, outer and expanding circle varieties and cultures in global ELT textbooks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, 10.
WorlockK. (2017). English language teaching: A market on the brink: Market size, share, forecast and trend report. Outsell.
62.
YenC.-P.HungT.-W. (2019). New data on the linguistic diversity of authorship in philosophy journals. Erkenntnis, 84, 953–974.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
