Differentiated instruction (DI) has shown positive effects on the success of language learning as compared to traditional teaching. Examining teachers’ beliefs pertaining to differentiation is important owing to the fact that teachers’ beliefs shape their pedagogical practices. Therefore, this study is aimed at exploring English teachers’ beliefs on DI and their reported strategies in the Hungarian secondary school context. Altogether 28 English teachers were interviewed between 2019 and 2021 using a semi-structured interview guide, and the constant comparative method was employed to analyse the data. The findings indicate that teachers mostly differentiate based on students’ readiness levels, while a focus on learners’ profiles was scarcely mentioned. The teachers perceived differentiation as an important yet challenging task; additionally, several of them showed low self-efficacy beliefs in DI. A novel DI tool, gamification, was also mentioned. This study concludes that raising the awareness of English teachers about DI with regard to its conceptualisation as well as its possible applications would be imperative in enhancing the effectiveness of language learning and maximising the capacities of each individual.
AlbertÁ.TankóGy.PinielK. (2018a). A tanulók válaszai a 7. Évfolyamon [Students’ responses in the 7th year]. In ÖvegesE.CsizérK. (Eds.), Vizsgálat a köznevelésben folyó idegennyelv-oktatás hatékonyságáról (pp. 52–89). Oktatási Hivatal.
2.
AlbertÁ.TankóGy.PinielK. (2018b). A tanulók válaszai a 11. évfolyamon [Students’ responses in the 11th year]. In ÖvegesE.CsizérK. (Eds.), Vizsgálat a köznevelésben folyó idegennyelv-oktatás hatékonyságáról (pp. 90–160). Oktatási Hivatal.
3.
AlshareefK.K.ImbeauM.B.AlbiladiW. (2022). Exploring the use of technology to differentiate instruction among teachers of gifted and talented students in Saudi Arabia. Gifted and Talented International. Epub ahead of print 3 March 2022. DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2022.2041507.
4.
AntónM. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 303–318.
5.
BaecherL.ArtigliereM.PattersonD.K.SpatzerA. (2012). Differentiated instruction for English language learners as ‘variations on a theme’. Middle School Journal, 43, 14–21.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
BlazD. (2016). Differentiated instruction: A guide for world language teachers. 2nd edition.Routledge.
9.
BoeijeH.R. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36, 391–409.
10.
BorgS. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
11.
BrownA.V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 46–60.
12.
Celce-MurciaM.OlshtainE. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
13.
CoubergsC.StruyvenK.VanthournoutG.EngelsN. (2017). Measuring teachers’ perceptions about differentiated instruction: The DI-Quest instrument and model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 41–54.
14.
CsíkszentmihályiM.AbuhamdehS.NakamuraJ. (2005). Flow. In ElliotA.DweckC. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–623). The Guilford Press.
15.
CsizérK. (2019). The language-learning experiences and their perceived impact on teaching: An interview study with English teachers in Hungary. In SatoM.LoewenS. (Eds.), Evidence based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 314–330). Routledge.
16.
CsizérK. (2020). Second language motivation research in a European context: The case of Hungary. Springer.
17.
CsizérK.IllésÉ. (2020). Helping to maximize learners’ motivation for second language learning. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 19, 19–31.
18.
CsizérK.KálmánCs. (2019). A study of retrospective and concurrent foreign language learning experiences: A comparative interview study in Hungary. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9, 225–246.
19.
CsizérK.AlbertÁ.SmidD.ZólyomiA. (2022). Motivation, autonomy, and emotions in foreign language learning: A multi-perspective investigation in Hungary. Unpublished manuscript in preparation, Department of English Applied Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
20.
DeunkM.I.Smale-JacobseA.E.de BoerH.DoolardS.BoskerR.L. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54.
21.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
22.
DörnyeiZ.RyanS. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
23.
DufvaH. (2003). Beliefs in dialogue: A Bakhtinian view. In KalajaP.BarcelosA.M.F. (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 131–151). Springer.
24.
DweckC.S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
25.
EllisR. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In EllisR.LoewenS.ElderC., et al. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Multilingual Matters.
26.
EllisR. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition. 2nd edition.Oxford.
27.
European Commission (2018). Flash Eurobarometer 466 report: The European education area. Eurobarometer.
28.
FreemanD. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. A perspective from north American educational research on teacher education in English language teaching. Language Teaching, 35, 1–13.
29.
GallettaA.CrossW.E. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York University Press.
30.
GheyssensE.ConsuegraE.EngelsN.StruyvenK. (2020). Good things come to those who wait: The importance of professional development for the implementation of differentiated instruction. Frontiers in Education, 5, 96.
31.
GheyssensE.ConsuegraE.EngelsN.StruyvenK. (2021). Creating inclusive classrooms in primary and secondary schools: From noticing to differentiated practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103210.
32.
HiverP. (2016). The triumph over experience: Hope and hardiness in novice L2 teachers. In MacIntyreP.D.GregersenT.MercerS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 168–192). Multilingual Matters.
33.
HoangT.WyattM. (2021). Exploring the self-efficacy beliefs of Vietnamese pre-service teachers of English as a foreign language. System, 96, 102422.
34.
HüttnerJ.Dalton-PufferC.SmitU. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 267–284.
35.
IllésÉ. (2020). Understanding context in language use and teaching: An ELF perspective. Routledge.
36.
KalajaP.BarcelosA.M.F. (2003). Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches. Springer.
37.
KalajaP.BarcelosA.M.F.AroM.Ruohotie-LyhtyM. (2015). Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
KappK.M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.
39.
KubanyiovaM. (2015). The role of teachers’ future self guides in creating L2 development opportunities in teacher-led classroom discourse: Reclaiming the relevance of language teacher cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 565–584.
40.
KubanyiovaM. (2020). Language teacher education in the age of ambiguity: Educating responsive meaning makers in the world. Language Teaching Research, 24, 49–59.
41.
LewittH.M. (2020). Reporting qualitative research in psychology: How to meet APA style journal article reporting standards. Revised edition. American Psychological Association.
42.
LindnerK.-T.AlnahdiG.H.WahlS.SchwabS. (2019). Perceived differentiation and personalization teaching approached in inclusive classrooms: Perspectives of students and teachers. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1–11.
43.
LongM. (2014). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.
44.
LortieD.C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
45.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2017). Measuring language mindsets and modeling their relations with goal orientations and emotional and behavioral responses in failure situations. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 214–243.
46.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2019). Language mindsets, meaning-making, and motivation. In LambM.CsizérK.HenryA.RyanS. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 537–559). Palgrave Macmillan.
MatheisS.KronborgL.SchmittM.PreckelF. (2017). Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and Talented International, 32, 134–160.
49.
MercerS.RyanS. (2010). A mindset for EFL: Learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT Journal, 64, 436–444.
50.
MoodieI. (2016). The anti-apprenticeship of observation: How negative prior language learning experience influences English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. System, 60, 29–41.
51.
NishinoT. (2012). Modeling teacher beliefs and practices in context: A multimethods approach. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 380–399.
52.
Omaggio HadleyA. (1993). Teaching language in context. 2nd edition.Heinle and Heinle.
53.
OrtegaD.P.CabreraJ.M.BenalcázarJ.V. (2018). Differentiating instruction in the language learning classroom: Theoretical considerations and practical applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9, 1220–1228.
54.
ÖvegesE. (2018). A nyelvi előkészítő évfolyam kezdete és megvalósulása: Tapasztalatok és eredmények [The start and implementation of the year of intensive language learning: Experience and results]. Magyar Pedagógia, 118, 55–71.
55.
ÖvegesE. (2019). Differenciálás a nyelvoktatásban [Differentiation in language education]. Unpublished conference presentation at Szakmai Nap, Nyelviskolák Szakmai Egyesülete [Professional Day, Professional Association of Language Schools], Győr, Hungary.
56.
ÖvegesE.CsizérK. (Eds.). (2018). Vizsgálat a köznevelésben folyó idegennyelv-oktatás kereteiről és hatékonyságáról: Kutatási jelentés [Investigation of the context and efficiency of foreign language teaching in public education: Research report]. Oktatási Hivatal.
57.
ÖvegesE.CsizérK.DérK. (2019). Az idegennyelv-tanítás iskolai szintű szabályozása: keretek, célok és megközelítések [Regulations on language education at school level in Hungary: organizational framework, aims and approaches in local curricula]. Modern Nyelvoktatás, 25, 3–14.
58.
PattonM.Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 4th edition.Sage.
59.
PawlakM.ZawodniakJ.KrukM. (2020). Boredom in the foreign language classroom: A micro-perspective. Springer.
60.
PendergastD.GarvisS.KeoghJ. (2011). Pre–service student-teacher self–efficacy beliefs: An insight into the making of teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 46–57.
61.
PonterottoJ.G. (2006). Brief note on the origins, evolution and meaning of the qualitative research concept ‘thick description’. The Qualitative Report, 11, 538–549.
62.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd edition.Sage.
63.
ShohamyE. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.
64.
SmidD.ZólyomiA. (2021). An interview study on Hungarian high school English teachers’ beliefs about learning English. In TankóGy.CsizérK. (Eds.), DEAL 2021: Current explorations in English applied linguistics (pp. 139–162). Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös Loránd University.
65.
StollmanS.MeirinkJ.WestenbergM.van DrielJ. (2019). Teachers’ interactive cognitions of differentiated instruction in a context of student talent development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 138–149.
66.
SundqvistP.SylvénL.K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
SuprayogiM.N.ValckeM.GodwinR. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291–301.
68.
TomlinsonC.A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
69.
TomlinsonC.A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. 3rd edition.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
70.
TomlinsonC.A.ImbeauM.B. (2010). Learning and managing a differentiated classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
71.
TomlinsonC.A.BrightonC.HertbergH., et al. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 119–145.
ValiandesS. (2015). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruction on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17–26.
74.
VantieghemW.RooseI.GheyssensE., et al. (2020). Professional vision of inclusive classrooms: A validation of teachers’ reasoning on differentiated instruction and teacher-student interactions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100912.
75.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
76.
YouC.J.DörnyeiZ.CsizérK. (2016). Motivation, vision, and gender: A survey of learners of English in China. Language Learning, 66, 94–123.
77.
ZólyomiA.SmidD. (2020). Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs regarding the malleability of L2 learning skills: A qualitative inquiry. Unpublished conference presentation, International Diversity in Teacher and Higher Education Research in the 21st Century: Insights from Doctoral Students, Supervisors, and Doctoral School Leaders, Budapest, Hungary. Available at: http://edite-events.elte.hu (accessed July 2022).
