This study investigated the effect of consistent freewriting practice on written fluency development. Thirty-nine first-year university students completed 70 10-minute freewriting activities over the course of an academic semester. Written fluency, measured as words produced per minute (wpm), increased from a mean of 19.5 wpm to 30.1 wpm over a period of 15 weeks. Further analysis revealed statistically significant gains over two-week intervals. The participants also wrote three timed TOEFL-style essays at the beginning, middle, and end of the semester to see whether fluency gains transferred to more structured contexts. The results showed a statistically significant increase in written output on the timed essays, along with an increase in holistic scores. Findings indicate that consistent freewriting can result in rapid and statistically significant fluency gains that carry over to other more structured contexts. In addition, the improved scores on the timed essays suggest increased fluency may allow learners to attend to other aspects of writing, improving the global quality of the text. A detailed description of the fluency building activity and discussion of results are provided.
Abdel LatifM.M.M. (2013). What do we mean by writing fluency and how can it be validly measured?Applied Linguistics, 34, 99–105.
2.
BabaK. (2009). Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 191–208.
3.
BabaK.NittaR. (2010). Dynamic effects of task type practice on the Japanese EFL university student’s writing: Text analysis with Coh-Metrix. In GuesgenH.W.MurrayR.C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2010) (pp. 217−222). AAAI Press.
4.
BabaK.NittaR. (2014). Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64, 1−35.
5.
BonzoJ.D. (2008). To assign a topic or not: Observing fluency and complexity in intermediate foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 722−735.
6.
BrutonD.L.KirbyD.R. (1987). Research in the classroom: Written fluency: Didn’t we do that last year?The English Journal, 76, 89−92.
7.
ChenowethN.A.HayesJ.R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating texts in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18, 80−98.
8.
CohenJ. (2013). The impact of topic selection on writing fluency: Making a case for freedom. Journal of NELTA, 18, 31−40.
9.
de BotK. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529−555.
ElbowP. (1973). Writing without teachers. Oxford University Press.
12.
EllisR.YuanF. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59–84.
13.
FellnerT.AppleM. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. JALT CALL Journal, 2, 15–26.
14.
FlowerL.HayesJ.R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32.
15.
HayesJ.R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In LevyC.M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Erlbaum.
16.
HwangJ.A. (2010). A case study of the influence of freewriting on writing fluency and confidence of EFL college-level students. University of Hawai’i Second Language Studies, 28, 97–134.
17.
JohnsonM.D. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 13–38.
18.
JohnsonM.D.MercadoL.AcevedoA. (2012) The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 264–282.
19.
KelloggR.T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In LevyC.M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The Science of writing (pp. 57–71). Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
NationP. (2007). The four strands. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 2–13.
21.
OngJ.ZhangL.J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 218–233.
22.
OttosonK.J.CraneP.A. (2016). Self-selected topics vs. teacher-selected topics: The impact on writing fluency. Korea TESOL Journal, 12, 47–64.
23.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research. Sage.
24.
RobinsonP. (2001). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17, 368–392.
25.
RobinsonP. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1–32.
26.
SasakiM. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 259–291.
27.
SasakiM. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54, 525–582.
28.
SegalowitzN. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge.
29.
SkehanP. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
30.
SkehanP.FosterP. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge University Press.
31.
van GelderenA.OostdamR.van SchootenE. (2011). Does foreign language writing benefit from increased lexical fluency? Evidence from a classroom experiment. Language Learning, 61, 281–321.
32.
Wolfe-QuinteroK.InagakiS.KimH.Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
