The study investigated the role of linguistic and cognitive factors in Turkish word reading fluency (WREAD) among second-grade Turkish–Arabic simultaneous bilingual and Turkish monolingual children. It specifically focused on the impact of phonological awareness (PA), phonological memory (PM), rapid automatized naming (RAN), morphological awareness (MA), morphological fluency (MF), processing speed (PS), and vocabulary knowledge (VK) on reading fluency.
Methodology:
The study used a cross-sectional design and collected data from 127 children in Hatay, Turkey. The participants completed a battery of tests measuring PA, PM, RAN, MA, PS, VK, and WREAD. The tests were administered individually, and the scores, along with the time spent on each test, were recorded.
Data and analysis:
Data from the tests were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Independent samples t-tests were conducted to determine the differences between bilingual and monolingual children in the linguistic and cognitive measures. Pearson r correlation analyses were conducted to illustrate the relationship among the variables and stepwise regression analyses to explore the extent to which these variables explained the variance in WREAD.
Findings:
The findings highlighted significant differences between Turkish–Arabic bilingual and Turkish monolingual children in PA and PS. While MF and RAN explained WREAD in the bilingual group, MF and PA were the strongest predictors of WREAD in the monolingual children.
Originality:
This study is the first to investigate word reading development in Turkish–Arabic simultaneous bilingual children, contributing novel insights into literacy acquisition in simultaneous bilingualism. In addition, the concept of MF has been proposed in the literature as a distinct measurement from MA.
Significance:
The study expands the existing knowledge on bilingual reading development, emphasizing the importance of timed cognitive and linguistic variables in predicting WREAD. It also sheds light on the educational needs of bilingual children in the Turkish context.
Aksu-KoçA.SlobinD. I. (1986). A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In ChafeW. L.NicholsJ. (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 159–167). Ablex.
2.
AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259.
3.
AraújoS.ReisA.PeterssonK. M.FaíscaL. (2015). Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 868–883.
4.
AsadiI. A.KhatebA. (2017). Predicting reading in vowelized and unvowelized Arabic script: An investigation of reading in first and second grades. Reading Psychology, 38(5), 486–505.
5.
BabayiğitS.StainthorpR. (2007). Preliterate phonological awareness and early literacy skills in Turkish. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(4), 394–413.
6.
BabayiğitS.StainthorpR. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 539–568.
7.
BabayiğitS.StainthorpR. (2011). Modeling the relationships between cognitive–linguistic skills and literacy skills: New insights from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 169–189.
8.
BabayiğitS.StainthorpR. (2014). Correlates of early reading comprehension skills: A componential analysis. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 185–207.
9.
BabürN. (2003). Exploring the relationships among RAN, linguistic/cognitive variables and early reading skills in first- and second-grade students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Arizona ProQuest Dissertations & Theses3119931.
10.
BabürN.HaznedarB.ErçetinG.ÖzermanD. (2013). Türkçe’de kelime okuma bilgisi testinin geliştirilmesi [Developing word reading skills tests in Turkish]. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi (Bogazici University Journal of Education), 28(2), 1–25.
11.
BaddeleyA. D. (1982). Implications of neuropsychological evidence for theories of normal memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 298(1089), 59–72.
12.
BaddeleyA. (1993). Short-term phonological memory and long-term learning: A single case study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 129–148.
13.
BaddeleyA. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.
14.
BakırF. H.BabürN. (2009). Türkçe Hızlı Otomatik İsimlendirme (HOTI) Testleri’nin geliştirilmesi ve ön bulgular [Developing Rapid Automatized Tests (RAN) in Turkish and Preliminary Findings]. Paper presented at 18, Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Konferansı (National Educational Sciences Conference), Selçuk, Izmir.
15.
BakırF. H.BabürN. (2018). Hızlı Otomatik İsimlendirme Testi’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması [The Adaptation of Rapid Automatized Naming Tests to Turkish]. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi (Bogazici Journal of Education), 35(2), 35–51.
16.
BaracR.BialystokE. (2012). Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development, 83(2), 413–422.
17.
BektaşS. (2017). Cognitive and linguistic components of reading acquisition in Turkish: Evidence from second and fourth graders [Unpublished master thesis, Boğaziçi University].
18.
BialystokE. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70(3), 636–644.
19.
BialystokE. (2001a). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
20.
BialystokE. (2001b). Metalinguistic aspects of bilingual processing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 169–181.
21.
BialystokE.CraikF. I.LukG. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240–250.
22.
BialystokE.LukG.PeetsK. F.YangS. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(4), 525–531.
23.
BialystokE.MajumderS. (1998). The relationship between bilingualism and the development of cognitive processes in problem solving. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 69–85.
24.
BialystokE.MajumderS.MartinM. M. (2003). Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage?Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 27–44.
25.
BlomE.KüntayA. C.MesserM.VerhagenJ.LesemanP. (2014). The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish–Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128, 105–119.
26.
BowersP. G. (1993). Text reading and rereading: Determinants of fluency beyond word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(2), 133–153.
27.
BowersP. G.WolfM. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5(1), 69–85.
28.
CalvoA.BialystokE. (2014). Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning. Cognition, 130(3), 278–288.
29.
CarlisleJ. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In FeldmanL. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
CarlisleJ. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24(3–4), 291–322.
31.
CattsH. W.GillispieM.LeonardL. B.KailR. V.MillerC. A. (2002). The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(6), 510–525.
32.
ComptonD. L.DefriesJ. C.OlsonR. K. (2001). Are RAN-and phonological awareness-deficits additive in children with reading disabilities?Dyslexia, 7(3), 125–149.
33.
CumminsJ. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251.
34.
CuttingL. E.DencklaM. B. (2001). The relationship of rapid serial naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing, 14(7–8), 673–705.
35.
DeaconS. H. (2012). Sounds, letters and meanings: The independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(4), 456–475.
36.
DeaconS. H.KirbyJ. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223–238.
37.
DelcenserieA.GeneseeF. (2016). The effects of age of acquisition and bilingualism on verbal working memory. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(5), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916639158
38.
DufvaM.NiemiP.VoetenM. J. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing, 14(1–2), 91–117.
39.
DurgunoğluA. Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1), 189–204.
40.
DurgunoğluA. Y. (2017). An updated review of cross-language transfer and its educational implications. In SegersE.BroekP. V. D. (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven (pp. 167–182). John Benjamins.
41.
DurgunoğluA. Y.NagyW. E.Hancin-BhattB. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 453–465.
42.
GeneseeF.GevaE.DresslerC.KamilM. L. (2006). Synthesis: Cross-Linguistic Relationships. In AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 153–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
43.
GeorgiouG. K.ParrilaR.PapadopoulosT. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 566–580.
44.
González-ValenzuelaM. J.Díaz-GiráldezF.López-MontielM. D. (2016). Cognitive predictors of word and pseudoword reading in Spanish first-grade children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 774.
45.
GreenL. (2009). Morphology and literacy: Getting our heads in the game. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(3), 283–285.
46.
GüldenoğluB.KargınT.ErgülC. (2016). Sesbilgisel farkındalık becerilerinin okuma ve okuduğunu anlama üzerindeki etkisi: Boylamsal bir çalışma [The Influence of Phonological Awareness on Reading and Reading Comprehension: A Longitudinal Study]. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 251–272.
47.
KailR.HallL. K. (1994). Processing speed, naming speed, and reading. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 949–954.
48.
KailR.ParkY. S. (1994). Processing time, articulation time, and memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57(2), 281–291.
49.
KodaK.ZehlerA. (Eds.). (2008). Learning to Read across Languages: Cross-Linguistic Relationships in First- and Second-Language Literacy Development. New York: Routledge.
50.
KrollJ. F.BialystokE. (2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 497–514.
51.
KuoL.AndersonR. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3
52.
Kuzucu ÖrgeS. (2018). Differentiating poor and good readers in second grade: Cognitive and linguistic variables [Unpublished master thesis, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi].
53.
Kuzucu ÖrgeS.BabürN.BorkanB.HaznedarB. (2021). İlkokul İkinci Sınıfta Zayıf ve İyi Okuyucuların Okuma Akıcılığını Yordayan Dilbilimsel ve Bilişsel Beceriler [Linguistic and Cognitive Predictors of Word Reading Fluency in Poor and Good Readers in the 2nd Grade]. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 38(2), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.52597/buje.1008426
54.
LayesS.LalondeR.RebaïM. (2017). Study on morphological awareness and rapid automatized naming through word reading and comprehension in normal and disabled reading Arabic- speaking children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(2), 123–140.
55.
LesauxN. K.SiegelL. S. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 1005–1019.
56.
LuoY. C.ChenX.GevaE. (2014). Concurrent and longitudinal cross- linguistic transfer of phonological awareness and morphological awareness in Chinese-English bilingual children. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 89–115.
57.
MahonyD.SingsonM.MannV. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 191–218.
58.
ManisF. R.DoiL. M.BhadhaB. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 325–333.
59.
MoatsL. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44(1), 81–102.
60.
NicolsonR. I.FawcettA. J. (1994). Reaction times and dyslexia. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47(1), 29–48.
61.
NortonE. S.WolfM. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.
62.
OllerD. K.PearsonB. Z.Cobo-LewisA. B. (2007). Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 191–230.
63.
OrdóñezC. L.CarloM. S.SnowC. E.McLaughlinB. (2002). Depth and breadth of vocabulary in two languages: Which vocabulary skills transfer?Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 719–728.
64.
OuelletteG. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566.
65.
ÖzataH. (2013). Reading acquisition in early bilingualism: Reading skills of Turkish child L2 learners of English [Unpublished master’s thesis, Boğaziçi University].
66.
ÖzataH. (2018). Reading fluency and comprehension in a transparent orthography: Evidence from Turkish children [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boğaziçi University].
67.
ÖzataH.BabürN.HaznedarB. (2016). Phonological awareness in reading acquisition: Evidence from reading skills of Turkish-English successive bilingual children. In HaznedarB.KetrezN. (Eds.), The acquisition of Turkish in childhood (pp. 243–271). John Benjamins.
68.
PapadopoulosT. C.SpanoudisG. C.GeorgiouG. K. (2016). How is RAN related to reading fluency? A comprehensive examination of the prominent theoretical accounts. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–15.
69.
ParkJ. S.MillerC. A.SanjeevanT.van HellJ. G.WeissD. J.Mainela-ArnoldE. (2020). Bilingualism and processing speed in typically developing children and children with developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(5), 1479–1493.
70.
PearsonB. Z. (2002). Narrative competence among monolingual and bilingual school children in Miami. In OllerD. K.EilersR. E. (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 135–174). Multilingual Matters.
71.
RothouK. M.TsimpliI. (2020). Biliteracy and reading ability in children who learn Greek as a second language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23, 1036–1050.
72.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children committee on the prevention of reading difficulties in young children. National Research Council.
73.
SönmezE. (2015). An investigation of spelling skills in Turkish: The role of phonological encoding and rapid naming in the literacy skills of third and fourth graders [Unpublished master thesis, Boğaziçi University].
74.
StahlS. A.FairbanksM. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110.
75.
TaborsP. O.PaezM. M.LopezL. M. (2003). Dual language abilities of bilingual four-year olds: Initial findings from the early childhood study of language and literacy development of Spanish-speaking children. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 1(1), 70–91.
76.
TanL. H.SpinksJ. A.EdenG. F.PerfettiC. A.SiokW. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 8781–8785.
77.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.BurgessS.HechtS. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 161–185.
78.
UccelliP.PáezM. M. (2007). Narrative and vocabulary development of bilingual children from kindergarten to first grade: Developmental changes and associations among English and Spanish skills. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38(3), 225–236.
79.
VerhagenW.AarnoutseC.Van LeeuweJ. (2008). Phonological awareness and naming speed in the prediction of Dutch children’s word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(4), 301–324.
80.
VerhoevenL. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies Studies of Reading, 4, 313–330.
81.
VerhoevenL.PerfettiC. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross- linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 457–466.
82.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73–87.
83.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.HechtS. A.BarkerT. A.BurgessS. R.GaronT. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 468–479.
84.
WangM.ChengC.ChenS.-W. (2006). Contribution of morphological awareness to Chinese-English biliteracy acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 542–553.
85.
WimmerH.LanderlK.LinortnerR.HummerP. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40(3), 219–249.
86.
WolfM.BowersP. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415–438.
87.
WolfM.DencklaM. (2003). Rapid automatized naming tests. Super Duper.
