The study aimed to explore the evidence of first language (L1) mediation in second language (L2) word associations and the L2 learner-related factors affecting the extent of L1 mediation with the following approaches. First, different from previous research, word association tests (WATs) embraced both receptive and productive word associations in the study. Second, different from word-related variables such as cognates vs. non-cognates in previous research, the study examined learner-related factors. Third, it examined whether the methodological difference (receptive vs. productive test formats) may affect the extent of L1 mediation in L2 access. A total of 108 Chinese English learners varying in proficiency, learning experiences, input and motivation participated in WATs using 24 stimulus words. The results suggested, (1) from the findings of descriptive statistics and ANOVAs, the evidence of L1 mediation was found in all three L2 proficiency groups with different extent of higher L1 mediation in lower proficiency groups. (2) From the findings of Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, significant correlations were found with L1-promoting learning environments, L2 input, integrative motivation and the learners’ awareness of L1 activation. (3) The findings of the paired-samples t-tests confirmed a significant difference between the two test formats. Based on the findings, the study suggested the promotion of L2-rich learning environments, integrative motivation, and receptive and productive word associations in the L2 network.
AgdamS.J.SadeghiK. (2014). Two formats of word association tests: A study of depth of word knowledge. English Language Teaching, 10, 1–12.
2.
BaiR.L. (2005). Word association responses. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 1, 28–31.
3.
BrownA.GullbergM. (2010). Changes in encoding of path of motion after acquisition of a second language. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 263–286.
4.
China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE). (2018). National Language Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China.
5.
ClentonJ. (2014). Testing the Revised Hierarchical Model: Evidence from word associations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 1–8.
6.
CollinsA.M.LoftusE.F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
7.
ColoméA. (2001). Lexical activation in bilinguals’ speech production: Language specific or language-independent?Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 721–736.
8.
De BotK.SchreuderR. (1993). Word production and the bilingual lexicon. In SchreuderR.WeltensB. (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 191–214). John Benjamins.
9.
De GrootA.M.B. (1989). Representational aspects of word concreteness and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 824–845.
10.
DongY.P.GuiS.C.MacWhinneyB. (2005). Shared and separate meanings in the bilingual mental lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8, 221–238.
11.
FanM.Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. Modern Language Journal, 87, 222–241.
12.
FarahianM. (2011). Mental lexicon: Its organization and representation. Brain Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2, 56–59.
13.
FitzpatrickT.IzuraC. (2011). Word association in L1 and L2: An exploratory study of response types, response times, and interlingual mediation. Cambridge University Press.
14.
GreenD.W. (1986). Control, activation and resource. Brain and Language, 27, 210–223.
HoshinoN.KrollJ.F. (2008). Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script?Cognition, 106, 501–511.
17.
JiangN. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21, 47–77.
18.
JiangN. (2002). Form–meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. SSLA, 24, 617–637.
19.
KimJ.J.KimM.S.LeeJ.S. (2002). Dissociation of working memory processing associated with native and second languages: PET investigation. Neuroimage, 15, 879–891.
20.
KrollJ.F.StewartE. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.
21.
KrollJ.F.Van HellJ.G.TokowiczN.GreenD.W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 373–381.
22.
LeeM.W.WilliamsJ.N. (2001). Lexical access in spoken word production by bilinguals: Evidence from the semantic competitor priming paradigm. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 233–248.
23.
LiH.ZhangF.H.MacWhinneyB. (2011). Examining language selection mechanism in bilingual lexical access. Foreign Languages in China, 5, 25–39.
24.
LiJ.H.ZhengY.YangJ. (2018). The influence of second language proficiency on the automatic activation of Chinese during English lexical access in Chinese English bilinguals. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 50, 101–113.
25.
LiL. (2016). L1 role in bilinguals’ mental lexicon: A comparative study between Chinese English and alphabetic bilinguals. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6, 1584–1590.
26.
LiX.S. (2013). Exploring the second language mental lexicon: How are words connected in L2 learners’ mind. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China.
27.
MearaP. (2002). The rediscovery of vocabulary. Second Language Research, 18, 393–407.
28.
MearaP. (2009). Connected words: Word associations and second language vocabulary acquisition. John Benjamins.
29.
MearaP.WolterB. (2004). V_Links: Beyond vocabulary depth. In AlbrechtsenD.HaastrupK.HenriksenB. (Eds.), Writing and vocabulary in foreign language acquisition (pp. 85–96). Museum Tusculanum Press.
30.
MillerN.A.KrollJ.F. (2002). Stroop effects in bilingual translation. Memory and Cognition, 30, 614–628.
31.
NamH.J. (2009). Konglish: Cross-linguistic lexical issues for Korean learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
32.
NamH.J. (2011). Konglish phenomenon: L1 activation in L2. English Teaching, 66, 191–209.
33.
NamH.J. (2014). L1 mediation in L2 lexical access: Emerging evidence from word association tests. The Journal of Modern British and American Language and Literature, 32, 39–65.
34.
NamH.J. (2017). What shapes the learning styles? In relation to learning contexts and English proficiency. Modern Studies in English Language and Literature, 61, 333–355.
35.
NamH.J. (2018). Bilingual memory: L1 mediation in L2 false memory. Studies in Linguistics, 46, 353–374.
36.
NameiS. (2004). Bilingual lexical development: A Persian–Swedish word association study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 363–388.
PavlenkoA. (2009). Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. In PavlenkoA. (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 125–160). Multilingual Matters.
39.
PengJ. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an intensive English language program in China. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 2, 33–59.
40.
PotterM.C.SoK.F.Von EckardtB.FeldmanL.B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23–38.
41.
QuC.H. (2019). The influence of L2 lexical proficiency on the L1 automatic activation during L2 lexical processing of Chinese English bilinguals. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 51, 560–571.
42.
ReadJ. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10, 355–371.
43.
Rodriguez-FornellsA.RotteM.HeinzeH. (2002). Brain potential and functional MRI evidence for how to handle two languages with one brain. Nature, 415, 1026–1029.
44.
SchwartzA.I.Van HellJ.G. (2012). Bilingual visual word recognition in sentence context. In AdelmanJ. (Ed.), Visual word recognition (pp. 131–150). Psychology Press.
45.
SingletonD. (1999). Exploring the second language mental lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
46.
Van BeijsterveldtL.M.Van HellJ.G. (2012). The development of deaf writers’ tense marking in narrative and expository text: A bimodal bilingual perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 128–144.
47.
Van HellJ.G.KrollJ.F. (2013). Using electrophysiological measures to track the mapping of words to concepts in the bilingual brain: A focus on translation. In AltarribaJ.IsurinL. (Eds.), Memory, language, and bilingualism: Theoretical and applied approaches (pp. 126–160). Cambridge University Press.
48.
Van WagenenS. (2014). The morphologically organized mental lexicon: Further experimental evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, 1–29.
49.
WangX.HuiB.ChenS. (2020). Language selective or non-selective in bilingual lexical access? It depends on lexical tones!PLOS ONE, 15, e0230412.
50.
WolterB. (2006). Lexical network structures and L2 vocabulary acquisition: The role of L1 lexical/conceptual knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 741–747.
51.
WuJ.WangR.M.FanM.LiL.ChenL.H. (2013). The process of non-attended language in radical search task of Chinese–English bilingual: An ERP study. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 5, 607–611.
52.
WuY.J.ThierryG. (2010). Chinese–English bilinguals reading English hear Chinese. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 7646–7651.
53.
XueG.DongQ.JinZ.ChenC. (2004). Mapping of verbal working memory in nonfluent Chinese–English bilinguals with functional MRI. Neuroimage, 22, 1–10.
54.
ZeelenbergR.PecherD. (2003). Evidence for long-term cross-language repetition priming in conceptual implicit memory tests. Journal of Memory and Language, 1, 80–94.
55.
ZhangP. (2016). Same translation effect on Chinese EFL learners’ lexical semantic processing. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 48, 382–395.
56.
ZhangP.ChenY.Y. (2017). Word association research: Past, present and future. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 4, 1–12.
57.
ZhangQ.LiuS.L. (2011). The mechanism of lexical selection in bilingual translating: A revised model in the light of the language selection theory. Foreign Languages Research, 1, 38–46.
58.
ZhengY.Y. (2011). Research on L2 learners’ mental lexicon from the perspective of association response types and L1 influence. Fudan Forum on Foreign Language and Literature, 1, 53–63.
