This study aimed to identify associations and predictors of willingness to communicate (WTC) of adult foreign language (FL) learners and whether they are contingent upon the FL being learned. To this end, our research investigated learner variables associated with WTC in adult FL learners of English and of French in an under-researched field of WTC studies in Spain. More specifically, the following variables were studied: gender, age, level of multilingualism, perceived relative standing in the class, language proficiency, teacher’s use of the FL in class, out-of-class foreign language use (OCFLU) and the two emotions of foreign language enjoyment (FLE) and foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA). Of the 9 independent variables examined, FLCA and language proficiency were found to be predictors of the WTC of both English and French language learners; additionally, enjoyment was found to be a predictor of WTC of learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) and OCFLU, of learners of French as a foreign language (FFL). Our findings indicate that the construct of WTC needs to be further studied as research may produce dissimilar results depending on the instructional setting, population and foreign language. Pedagogical implications for language teaching practices seeking to enhance adult FL learners’ WTC were also drawn from the study results.
AmiryousefiM. (2018). Willingness to communicate, interest, motives to communicate with the instructor, and L2 speaking: A focus on the role of age and gender. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 221–234.
2.
Acosta-ManzanoI. (2021). Students’ reasons to enrol in official language schools: A preliminary report. Unpublished report, University of Málaga, Spain.
3.
BakerS.C.MacIntyreP.D. (2003). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50, 311–334.
4.
BotesE.DewaeleJ.M.GreiffS. (2020). The power to improve: Effects of multilingualism and perceived proficiency on enjoyment and anxiety in foreign language learning. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 279–306.
5.
BygateM.SamudaV. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In EllisR. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). John Benjamins.
6.
CaoY. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39, 468–479.
7.
CaoY. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 789–814.
8.
CaoY.PhilpJ. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34, 480–493.
9.
ClémentR. (1986). Second language proficiency and acculturation: An investigation of the effects of language status and individual characteristics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 271–290.
10.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
11.
DeniesK.YashimaT.JanssenR. (2015). Classroom versus societal willingness to communicate: Investigating French as a second language in Flanders. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 718–739.
12.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2007). The effect of multilingualism, sociobiographical, and situational factors on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety of mature language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 391–409.
13.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2010). Multilingualism and affordances: Variation in self-perceived communicative competence and communicative anxiety in French L1, L2, L3 and L4. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 105–129.
14.
DewaeleJ.-M. (2019). The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward English, and teacher behavior on willingness to communicate among English foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38, 523–535.
15.
DewaeleJ.-M.DewaeleL. (2018). Learner-internal and learner-external predictors of willingness to communicate in the FL classroom. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2, 24–37.
16.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 237–274.
17.
DewaeleJ.-M.MacIntyreP.D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of FL learning? In MacIntyreP.D.GregersenT.MercerS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 215–236). Multilingual Matters.
18.
DewaeleJ.-M.PavelescuL.M. (2021). The relationship between incommensurable emotions and willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language: A multiple case study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15, 66–80.
19.
DewaeleJ.-M.Franco MagdalenaA.SaitoK. (2019). The effect of perception of teacher characteristics on Spanish EFL learners’ anxiety and enjoyment. Modern Language Journal, 103, 412–427.
20.
DewaeleJ.-M.PetridesK.V.FurnhamA. (2008). Effects of trait emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult multilinguals: A review and empirical investigation. Language Learning, 58, 911–960.
21.
DonovanL.A.MacIntyreP.D. (2004). Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived competence. Communication Research Reports, 21, 420–427.
22.
Fernández-GarcíaA.Fonseca-MoraM.C. (2019). EFL learners’ speaking proficiency and its connection to emotional understanding, willingness to communicate and musical experience. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 3 December 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1362168819891868.
23.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.ParisA.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
24.
FreiermuthM.R.ItoM.F. (2020). Seeking the source: The effect of personality and previous experiences on university students’ L2 willingness to communicate. Learning and Motivation, 71, 101640.
25.
GhonsoolyB.KhajavyG.H.AsadpourS.F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non–English major university students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 197–211.
26.
GreenB. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 499–501.
27.
HorwitzE.K.HorwitzM.B.CopeJ. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
28.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2020). Nivel de formación de la población adulta por grupos de edad [Level of training of the adult population by age groups]. CNED-2014 [Data file]. Available at: https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=6369 (accessed October 2021).
29.
International Test Commission. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. 2nd edition. International Journal of Testing, 18, 101–134.
30.
KhajavyG.H.MacIntyreP.D.BarabadiE. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 605–624.
31.
KhajavyG.H.GhonsoolyB.Hosseini FatemiA.ChoiC.W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 154–180.
32.
LeeJ.S. (2019). EFL students’ views of willingness to communicate in the extramural digital context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32, 692–712.
33.
LeeJ.S.DressmanM. (2017). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52, 435–445.
34.
LeeJ.S.HsiehJ.C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73.
35.
LeeJ.S.LeeK. (2020). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 24813–833.
36.
LantolfJ.P.ThorneS.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
37.
LeveltW.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.
38.
LiuM. (2017). Adult Chinese as a second language learners’ willingness to communicate in Chinese: Effects of cultural, affective, and linguistic variables. Psychological Reports, 120, 423–442.
39.
LongM.H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In GassS.M.MaddenC.G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377–393). Newbury House.
40.
MacIntyreP.BabinP.ClémentR. (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents & consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47, 215–229.
41.
MacIntyreP.BakerS.ClémentR.DonovanL. (2002), Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 53, 137–166.
42.
MacIntyreP.BakerS.ClémentR.DonovanL. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 589–608.
43.
MacIntyreP.D. (1992). Anxiety and language learning from a stages of processing perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. Available at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses/2155 (accessed October 2021).
44.
MacIntyreP.D.CharosC. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3–26.
45.
MacIntyreP.D.DoucetteJ. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38, 161–171.
46.
MacIntyreP.D.ClémentR.DörnyeiZ.NoelsK.A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
47.
McCroskeyJ.C.BaerJ.E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO, USA.
48.
Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deporte (MECD). (2016). Estadística de las Enseñanzas no universitarias curso 2015–16: Resultados académicos del curso 2015–16 [Statistics for non-university education for the 2015–16 academic year: Academic results for the 2015–16 academic year]. Available at: http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:3b8a66d0-0e97-4ac0-8f20-a934b37db96d/nota1516.pdf (accessed October 2021).
49.
MenzelK.CarrellJ. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48, 31–40.
50.
MercerS. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In GaoX. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 643–660). Springer International.
51.
MulyonoH.SaskiaR. (2020). Dataset on the effects of self-confidence, motivation and anxiety on Indonesian students’ willingness to communicate in face-to-face and digital settings. Data in Brief, 31, 105774.
52.
Oga-BaldwinW.L.Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 102128.
53.
Oga-BaldwinW.L.Q.NakataY. (2017). Engagement, gender, and motivation: A predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System, 65, 151–163.
54.
OlssonE.SylvénL.K. (2015). Extramural English and academic vocabulary. A longitudinal study of CLIL and non-CLIL students in Sweden. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 9, 77–103.
55.
PengJ.E. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System, 82, 161–173.
56.
PengJ.E.WoodrowL. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876.
57.
PlonskyL.OswaldF.L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
58.
SchepensJ. (2015). Bridging linguistic gaps: The effects of linguistic distance on the adult learnability of Dutch as an additional language. LOT. Available at: https://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/383_fulltext.pdf (accessed October 2021).
59.
SchepensJ.van HoutR.JaegerT.F. (2020). Big data suggest strong constraints of linguistic similarity on adult language learning. Cognition, 194, 104056.
60.
ShirvanM.KhajavyG.H.MacIntyreP.D.TaherianT. (2019). A meta-analysis of L2 Willingness to Communicate and its three high-evidence correlates. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 1241–1267.
61.
SvalbergA.M.-L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18, 242–258.
62.
SvalbergA.M.-L. (2018). Researching language engagement; current trends and future directions. Language Awareness, 27, 21–39.
63.
SwainM. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In GassS.MaddenC. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
64.
SwainM. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In CookG.SeidlhoferB. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.
65.
TabachnickB.G.FidellL.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. Harper & Row.
66.
TavakoliE.DavoudiM. (2017). Willingness to communicate orally: The case of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1509–1527.
67.
ThompsonS.KhawajaA. (2016). Foreign language anxiety in Turkey: The role of multilingualism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37, 115–130.
68.
TrebitsA. (2016). Sources of individual differences in L2 narrative production: The contribution of input, processing, and output anxiety. Applied Linguistics, 372, 155–174.
69.
TrillingB.FadelC. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
70.
ZareM.ShooshtariZ.G.JalilifarA. (2020). The interplay of oral corrective feedback and L2 willingness to communicate across proficiency levels. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 9 June 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1362168820928967.
71.
ZhouL.XiY.LochtmanK. (2020). The relationship between second language competence and willingness to communicate: the moderating effect of foreign language anxiety. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Epub ahead of print 6 April 2020. DOI: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1801697.
