The rapid growth in the number of English learners (ELs) in urban and rural school classrooms and the continual homogenization of a White, female, teaching force in the United States create cultural and linguistic disconnections in the classroom. As research suggests, although classroom diversity and ELs’ academic needs could be addressed by teachers’ enactment of linguistically responsive teaching (LRT) practices, most mainstream classroom teachers are not adequately prepared to implement these practices. This study examined the teaching practices of teachers with English learners in rural, elementary classroom settings in the US to find evidence of linguistically responsive teaching. It also explored how rurality shaped teachers’ instruction of ELs. The findings illustrate limited and considerable evidence of LRT implementation in the teachers’ classrooms. Evidence shows that two focal teachers mostly implemented LRT through their teaching strategies and scaffolded instruction. Findings further demonstrate that rural factors like place-based awareness and the teachers’ rural upbringing influenced their instruction of ELs. Implications on the need for researchers to undertake further and critical examination of LRT both as a theoretical framework that guides teacher preparation and as a theory that guides educational research are discussed while recommendations for language teaching, pedagogy and teacher preparation are put forward.
BergeronB.S. (2008). Enacting a culturally responsive curriculum in a novice teacher’s classroom encountering disequilibrium. Urban Education, 43, 4–28.
2.
BérubeB. (2000). Managing ESL programs in rural and small urban schools. TESOL.
3.
BigelowM. (2010). Mogadishu on the Mississippi: Language, racialized identity, and education in a new land. Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
BryantL.C.MossG.Zidjemas-BoudreauA.S. (2015). Understanding poverty through race dialogues in teacher preparation. Critical Questions in Education, 6, 1–16.
5.
BunchG.C. (2010). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37, 298–341.
6.
BurtonM.BrownK.JohnsonA. (2013). Storylines about rural teachers in the United States: A narrative analysis of the literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 28, 1–18.
7.
CalderonM.SlavinR.SanchezM. (2011). Effective instruction for English learners. The Future of Children, 21, 103–127.
8.
ChoG.de Castro-AmbrosettiD. (2005). Is ignorance bliss? Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward multicultural education. The High School Journal, 89, 24–28.
9.
CoadyM. (2019). Connecting school and the multilingual home: Theory and practice for rural educators. Multilingual Matters.
10.
CoadyM.HarperC.de JongE. (2011). Preservice to practice: Mainstream elementary teacher beliefs of preparation and efficacy with English language learners in the state of Florida. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 223–239.
11.
CoadyM.HarperC.de JongE. (2016). Aiming for equity: Preparing mainstream teachers for inclusion or inclusive classrooms?TESOL Quarterly, 50, 340–368.
12.
CoadyM.LiS.LopezM. (2018). Twenty-five years after the Florida Consent Decree: Does preparing all teachers work?FATE Journal, 3, 26–56.
13.
CoadyM.LopezM.MarichalN.HeffingtonD. (2019). Preparing teacher leaders for English language learners in rural settings. Theory and Practice in Rural Education, 9, 44–60.
14.
CoadyM.MillerD.ZeyuanJ., et al. (2020). Can English language teacher effectiveness be observed? Validation of an ELL-modified Danielson group model. TESOL Quarterly, 54, 173–200.
15.
ComberB.ReidJ.NixonH. (2007). Literacies in place: Teaching environmental communications. Primary English Teaching Association.
16.
CooperJ.E. (2007). Strengthening the case for community-based learning in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 245–255.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage
19.
JohnsonS.D. (1995). Will our research hold up under scrutiny?Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 32, 3–6.
20.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491.
21.
CumminsJ. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.
22.
DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (2013) (Eds.). The landscape of qualitative research. 4th edition.Sage.
23.
EppleyK. (2015). ‘Hey, I saw your grandparents at Walmart’: Teacher education for rural schools and communities. The Teacher Educator, 50, 67–86.
24.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92.
25.
FogleL.W.MoserK. (2017). Language teacher identities in the southern United States: Transforming rural schools. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 16, 65–79.
26.
GayG. (1997). Multicultural infusion in teacher education: Foundations and applications. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 150–177.
27.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching. 2nd edition.Teachers College Press.
28.
GiouroukakisV.HonigsfeldA. (2010). High-stakes testing and English language learners: Using culturally and linguistically responsive literacy practices in the high school English classroom. TESOL Journal, 1, 470–499.
29.
GreenwoodD.A. (2013). A critical theory of place-conscious education. In StevensonR.B.BordyM.DillonJ.WalsA.E.J. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 93–100). Routledge.
30.
GruenewaldD.A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32, 3–12.
31.
HaworthP. (2009). The quest for mainstream EAL pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 111, 2179–2208.
32.
HersiA.WatkinsonJ. (2012). Supporting immigrant students in a newcomer high school: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 35, 98–111.
33.
HorsfordS.D.SampsonC. (2013). High-ELL-growth states: Expanding funding equity and opportunity for English language learners. Voices in Urban Education, 37, 47–54.
LucasT.GrinbergJ. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD.J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 606–636). Routledge.
36.
LucasT.VillegasA.M. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 20–32.
37.
LucasT.VillegasA.M. (2010). The missing piece in teacher education: The preparation of linguistically responsive teachers. National Society for the Study of Education, 109, 297–318
38.
LucasT.VillegasA.M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In LucasT. (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms (pp. 55–72). Routledge.
39.
LucasT.VillegasA.M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 52, 98–109.
40.
LucasT.de OliveiraL.C.VillegasA.M. (2014). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers in multilingual contexts. In MahboobA.BarrattL. (Eds.), Englishes in multilingual contexts (pp. 219–230). Springer.
41.
LucasT.VillegasA.M.Freedson-GonzalezM. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 361–373.
42.
McCrackenJ.D.MillerC. (1988). Rural teachers’ perceptions of their schools and communities. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 5, 23–26.
43.
MerriamS.B.TisdellE.J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. 4th edition.Josey-Bass.
44.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2017). The condition of education 2017 at a glance. National Center for Education Statistics. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017144_AtAGlance.pdf (accessed September 2021).
45.
PalmerA.K. (2018). Teacher leaders are critical to improving English language arts instruction. English Journal, 104, 10–24.
46.
PattonM.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd edition.Sage.
47.
RaskinJ.D. (2002). Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism. American Communication Journal, 5, 373–388.
48.
RodriguezD.MannerJ.C. (2010). Professional development in Eastern North Carolina: Collaboration in ESL. In CastellC.BallantyneG. (Eds.), Professional development in action: Improving teaching for English language learners. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
49.
SaldañaJ. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
50.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd edition.Sage.
51.
SamsonJ.F.CollinsB.A. (2012). Preparing all teachers to meet the needs of English language learners: Applying research to policy and practice for teacher effectiveness. Center for American Progress.
52.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. 3rd edition.Teachers College Press.
53.
ShamahD.MacTavishK.A. (2009). Purpose and perceptions of family social location among rural youth. Youth and Society, 50, 26–48.
54.
ShortD.J.BoysonB.A. (2004). Creating access: Language and academic programs for secondary school newcomers. Center for Applied Linguistics.
55.
ShortD.FitzsimmonsS. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners. Carnegie Corporation.
56.
SleeterC.E. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 94–106.
57.
TandonM.ViescaK.M.HuestonC.MilbournT. (2017). Perceptions of linguistically responsive teaching in teacher candidates/novice teachers. Bilingual Research Journal, 40, 154–168.
58.
TurkanS.de OliveiraL.C.LeeO.PhelpsG. (2014). Proposing a knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116, 1–30.
59.
UkpokoduO. (2011). Developing teachers’ cultural competence: One teacher educator’s practice of unpacking student culturelessness. Action in Teacher Education, 33, 432–454.
60.
WhiteS.ReidJ. (2008). Placing teachers? Sustaining rural schooling through place-consciousness in teacher education. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 23, 1–11.
Wong-FilmoreL.SnowC. (2005). What teachers need to know about language. In AdgerC.T.SnowC.E.ChristianD. (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–54). Center for Applied Linguistics.
63.
WrightW.E. (2015). Foundations for teaching English language learners: Research, theory, policy, and practice. Caslon Publishing.
64.
YoungR.A.CollinA. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 373–388.
65.
Zhang-WuQ. (2017). Culturally and linguistically responsive teaching in practice: A case study of a fourth grade mainstream classroom teacher. Journal of Education, 197, 33–40.
