The increasing number of students with German as a second language (GL2) poses a great challenge for schools. Previous studies showed that especially young learners with a migration background are lagging behind in the acquisition of second language (L2) literacy. Experiencing problem behaviors (PB) in addition, might pose even greater challenges. Adequate vocabulary, including knowledge of additional vocabulary facts, is essential for appropriate L2 proficiency, and therefore, it is a crucial aspect of support that should be focused on. Thus, the aim of the study was to support vocabulary acquisition in students with GL2 regarding two aspects: (1) the acquisition of expressive and receptive vocabulary, and (2) the incidental acquisition of additional information regarding the vocabulary that are not explicitly focused on during intervention. To this end, the effectiveness of a multi-component method consisting of storytelling and flashcards, as well as motivational reinforcers, was examined using multiple baseline design. The intervention was carried out with nine primary school students with GL2 in three small groups three times a week for four weeks. The results indicated that the multi-component storytelling intervention was effective in increasing students’ receptive and expressive vocabulary, as well as additional vocabulary facts in just one month. The article concludes with a critical discussion of the findings and generally provides pedagogical implications for schools on how to adequately support students with GL2 in their vocabulary acquisition.
AbbasianG.-R.GhorbanpourE. (2016). The effect of flash card-based instruction on vocabulary learning by EFL learners. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2016, 1929–1938.
2.
Al-MansourS.Al-ShormanR.A. (2011). The effect of teachers’ storytelling aloud on the reading comprehension of Saudi elementary stage students. Journal of King Saud University – Language and Translation, 23, 69–76.
3.
Amato-ZechN.A.HoffK.E.DoepkeK.J. (2006). Increasing on-task behavior in the classroom: Extension of self-monitoring strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 211–221.
4.
AmiryousefiM.KetabiS. (2011). Mnemonic instruction: A way to boost vocabulary learning and recall. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2, 178–182.
5.
BarwasserA.KnaakT.GrünkeM. (2020). The effects of a multicomponent storytelling intervention on the vocabulary recognition of struggling English as a foreign language learners with learning disabilities. Insight into Learning Disabilities, 17, 35–53.
6.
BarwasserA.LenzB.GrünkeM. (2021a). A multimodal storytelling intervention for improving the reading and vocabulary skills of struggling German-as-a-second-language adolescents with learning and behavioral problems. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 18, 29–51.
7.
BarwasserA.BrachtJ.GrünkeM. (2021b). A storytelling approach on vocabulary, reading, and letter sound fluency of struggling first graders with German as second language with and without behavioral problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 683873.
BoothT.AinscowM. (2011). Index for inclusion developing learning and participation in schools. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
10.
BorovskyA.EllisE.M.EvansJ.L.ElmanJ.L. (2016). Semantic structure in vocabulary knowledge interacts with lexical and sentence processing in infancy. Child Development, 87, 1893–1908.
11.
Bowman-PerrottL.DavisH.VannestK., et al. (2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 42, 39–55.
12.
BrownR.WaringR.DonkaewbuaS. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 136–163.
13.
CervettiG.N.WrightT.S.HwangH. (2016). Conceptual coherence, comprehension, and vocabulary acquisition: A knowledge effect?Reading and Writing, 29, 761–779.
14.
ChenC.M.ChungC.J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51, 624–645.
15.
ChlapanaE.TafaE. (2014). Effective practices to enhance immigrant kindergarteners’ second language vocabulary learning through storybook reading. Reading and Writing, 27, 1619–1640.
16.
ChowJ.C.WehbyJ.H. (2018). Associations between language and problem behavior: A systematic review and correlational meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 61–82.
17.
ClarkM.J.PaivioA. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210.
CrookesG.SchmidtR.W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469–512.
20.
CrowleyK.McLaughlinT.F.KahnR. (2013). Using direct instruction flashcards and reading racetracks to improve sight word recognition of two elementary students with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25, 297–311.
21.
CuevasJ. (2016). An analysis of current evidence supporting two alternate learning models: Learning styles and dual coding. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 6, 1–13.
22.
De HouwerA. (2011). Language input environments and language development in bilingual acquisition. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 221–240.
23.
De NaeghelJ.Van KeerH.VansteenkisteM.RosseelY. (2012). The relation between elementary students’ recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1006–1021.
24.
De VosJ.F.SchriefersH.NivardM.G.LemhöferK. (2018). A meta-analysis and meta-regression of incidental second language word learning from spoken input. Language Learning, 68, 906–941.
25.
DongY.R. (2013). Powerful learning tools for ELLS: Using native language, familiar examples, and concept mapping to teach English language learners. The Science Teacher, 80, 51–57.
26.
DörnyeiZ. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Longman.
27.
DörnyeiZ. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA Review, 19, 42–68.
28.
DörnyeiZ. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.
29.
DörnyeiZ.SkehanP. (2003) Individual differences in second language learning. In DoughtyC.J.LongM.H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford University Press.
DursoF.T.ShoreW.J. (1991). Partial knowledge of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 190–202.
32.
EllemanA.M.LindoE.J.MorphyP.ComptonD.L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 1–44.
33.
EllisG.BrewsterJ. (2002). Tell it again: The new storytelling handbook for primary teachers. Penguin English.
34.
EllisR. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
35.
EllisR.LoewenS.ElderC., et al. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Multilingual Matters.
36.
FalkenbergC.A.BarbettaP.M. (2013). The effects of a self-monitoring package on homework completion and accuracy of students with disabilities in an inclusive education classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 190–210.
FittonL.McllraithA.L.WoodC.L. (2018). Shared book reading interventions with English learners: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88, 712–751.
39.
Ford-ConnorsE.ParatoreJ.R. (2015). Vocabulary instruction in fifth grade and beyond: Sources of word learning and productive contexts for development. Review of Educational Research, 85, 50–91.
40.
FrishkoffG.A.PerfettiC.A.Collins-ThompsonK. (2011). Predicting robust vocabulary growth from measures of incremental learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 71–91.
41.
GarcíaJ.N.de CasoA.M. (2004). Effects of a motivational intervention towards writing of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 141–159.
42.
GardnerR.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
43.
GentryJ.E.LindseyP. (2008). The impact of assistive technology on vocabulary acquisition of a middle school student with learning disabilities and limited English proficiency: A descriptive case study analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 2008, 63–93.
44.
GevaE.FarniaF. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1819–1845.
45.
Ginsburg-BlockM.D.RohrbeckC.A.FantuzzoJ.W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 732–749.
46.
GogolinI.Dirimİ.KlingerT., et al. (2011). Förderung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund: Bilanz und Perspektiven eines Modellprogramms [Promotion of children and young people with a migration background: Balance and perspectives of a model programme]. FörMig edition. Waxmann.
47.
GrahamK.M.EslamiZ.R. (2020). Does the simple view of writing explain L2 writing development? A meta-analysis. Reading Psychology, 41, 485–511.
48.
GravesM.F. (2016). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. 2nd edition.Teachers College Press.
49.
GreyS.WilliamsJ.N.RebuschatP. (2015). Individual differences in incidental language learning: The role of learning styles, personality, and working memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 44–53.
50.
GunterP.L.MillerK.A.VennM.L. (2003). A case study of the effects of self-graphing reading performance data for a girl identified with emotional/ behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 48, 28–31.
51.
HallC.SteinleP.K.VaughnS. (2019) Reading instruction for English learners with learning disabilities: What do we already know, and what do we still need to learn?New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019, 145–189.
52.
Harju-LuukkainenH.McElvanyN.StangJ. (2020). Monitoring student achievement in the 21st century: European policy perspectives and assessment strategies. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
53.
HarmonJ.M.WoodK.D.KiserK. (2009). Promoting vocabulary learning with the interactive word wall. Middle School Journal, 40, 58–63.
54.
HemmatiF.GholamrezapourZ.HessamyG. (2015). The effects of teachers’ storytelling and reading story aloud on the listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5, 1482–1488.
55.
HirschS.E.EnnisR.P.McDanielS.C. (2013). Student self-graphing as a strategy to increase teacher effectiveness and student motivation. Beyond Behavior, 22, 31–39.
56.
HoffE. (2009). Language development. Wadsworth.
57.
HoffE.CoreC.PlaceS., et al. (2012). Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39, 1–27.
58.
HorwitzE.K.HorwitzM.B.CopeJ.A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
59.
HuangH. (2006). The effects of storytelling on EFL young learners’ reading comprehension and word recall. English Teaching & Learning, 30, 51–74.
60.
HulstijnJ.H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In DoughtyC.LongM.H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–381). Blackwell.
61.
International Organization for Migration. (2019). IOM’s Global Migration Data Analysis Centre. International Organization for Migration. Available at: https://gmdac.iom.int (accessed September 2021).
62.
KamilM.L.BormanG.D.DoleJ., et al. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: IES practice guide (NCEE 2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
63.
KaramiA.BowlesF.A. (2019). Which strategy promotes retention? Intentional vocabulary learning, incidental vocabulary learning, or a mixture of both?Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(9).
64.
KauffmanJ.M.LandrumT.J. (2009). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth. 9th edition.Merrill/Pearson.
65.
KimM. (2010). The effects of storytelling on adult English language learners. Linguistic Research, 27, 447–473.
66.
KirschC. (2016). Using storytelling to teach vocabulary in language lessons: Does it work?The Language Learning Journal, 44, 33–51.
KleinW. (1996). Language acquisition at different ages. In MagnussonD. (Ed.), Individual development over the lifespan: Biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 88–108). Cambridge University Press.
69.
KnaakT.GrünkeM.BarwasserA. (2021). Enhancing vocabulary recognition in English foreign learners with and without learning disability: The effects of a multi component storytelling intervention approach. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 19, 1–18.
KristenC.GranatoN. (2007). The education attainment of the second generation in Germany: Social origins and ethnic inequality. IAB Discussion Paper No. 4/2007. Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. Available at: http://doku.iab.de/discussionpapers/2007/dp0407.pdf (accessed September 2021).
72.
LandauerT.K.KireyevK.PanaccioneC. (2011). Word maturity: A new metric for word knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 92–108.
73.
LauferB. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In ArnaudP.J.L.BéjointH. (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). Macmillan.
74.
LauferB.NationP. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307–322.
LeacoxL.JacksonC.W. (2014). Spanish vocabulary-bridging technology-enhanced instruction for young English language learners’ word learning. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14, 175–197.
77.
LedfordJ.R.D.L.Gast (Eds.). (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
78.
LeonsE.HerbertC.GobboK. (2009). Students with learning disabilities and AD/HD in the foreign language classroom: Supporting students and instructors. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 42–54.
79.
LesauxN.K.KiefferM.J.KelleyJ.G.HarrisJ.R. (2014). Effects of academic vocabulary instruction for linguistically diverse adolescents: Evidence from a randomized field trial. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 1159–1194.
80.
LittleS.G.Akin-LittleA.O’NeillK. (2015). Group contingency interventions with children: 1980–2010: A meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 39, 332–341.
81.
LoewenS.ReindersH. (2011). Key concepts in second language acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan.
82.
MaH.H. (2006). An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single subject researches: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification, 30, 598–617.
83.
MacIntyreP.D. (2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 45–68). John Benjamins.
84.
MaierM.F.BohlmannN.L.PalaciosN.A. (2016). Cross-language associations in the development of preschoolers’ receptive and expressive vocabulary. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 49–63.
85.
MarulisL.M.NeumanS.B. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children’s word learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 300–335.
86.
MasgoretA.-M.GardnerR.C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and Associates. Language Learning, 53, 123–163.
87.
MayerR.E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In MayerR. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.
88.
McDougallD.MorrisonC.AwanaB. (2012). Students with disabilities use tactile cued self-monitoring to improve academic productivity during independent tasks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30, 119–130.
89.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN.L. (2011). Educational programs for elementary students with learning disabilities: Can they be both effective and inclusive?Learning Disabilities Practice, 26, 48–57.
90.
Melby-LervagM.LervagA. (2011). Cross-linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 114–135.
91.
MiltonJ.WadeJ.HopkinsN. (2010). Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In ChacónBeltránR.Abello-ContesseC.Torreblanca-LópezM. (Eds.), Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 83–98). Multilingual Matters.
92.
Ministry for School and Further Education NRW. (2016). Integration durch Bildung: Maßnahmen und Initiativen des Ministeriums für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen für zugewanderte Kinder und Jugendliche [Integration through education: Measures and initiatives of the Ministry for Schools and Further Education of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia for immigrant children and young people]. Ministry for School and Further Education NRW. Available at: https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/q/upload/Schule_und_Zuwanderung/Pressemitteilung_MSW_24.05.2016.pdf (accessed September 2021).
93.
MitchellD.SutherlandD. (2020). What really works in special and inclusive education. Using evidence-based teaching strategies. 3rd edition.Routledge.
94.
MizumotoA.TakeuchiO. (2009). Examining the effectiveness of explicit instruction of vocabulary learning strategies with Japanese EFL university students. Language Teaching Research, 13, 425–449.
95.
MolS.E.BusA.G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 267–296.
96.
NationI.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Heinle & Heinle.
97.
NationI.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
98.
NationI.S.P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language. 2nd edition.Cambridge University Press.
99.
NationI.S.P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27, 136–145.
100.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U.S. Government Printing Office.
101.
NelsonJ.HarwoodH. (2010). Learning disabilities and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 3–17.
102.
NeumanS.B.WongK.M.FlynnR.KaeferT. (2019). Learning vocabulary from educational media: The role of pedagogical supports for low-income preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 32–44.
103.
NguyenC.D.BoersF. (2019). The effect of content retelling on vocabulary uptake from a TED talk. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 5–29.
104.
OxfordR.L.CrookallD. (1990). Vocabulary learning: A critical analysis of techniques. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 9–30.
105.
PaivioA. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.
106.
ParkerR.I.VannestK.J.DavisJ.L. (2011a). Effect size in single case research: A review of nine non-overlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 302–322.
107.
ParkerR.I.VannestK.J.DavisJ.L.SauberS.B. (2011b). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299.
108.
PekerH.RegallaM.CoxD.T. (2018). Teaching and learning vocabulary in context. Examining engagement in three prekindergarten French classrooms. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 472–483.
109.
PetersenI.T.LeBeauB. (2021). Language ability in the development of externalizing behavior problems in childhood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113, 68–85.
110.
PintrichP.R. (2003). Motivation and classroom learning. In ReynoldsW.M.MillerG.E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology: Volume 7 (pp. 103–122). Wiley.
111.
PopkinJ.SkinnerC.H. (2003). Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components. School Psychology Review, 32, 282–295.
112.
RaffertyL.A. (2010). Step-by-step: Teaching students to self-monitor. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43, 50–58.
113.
RamezanaliN.UchiharaT.FaezF. (2020). Efficacy of multi glossing on second language vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 55, 105–133.
114.
RichT.WeberK.P.McLaughlinT.F.Sells-LoveD. (2016). The effects of direct instruction flashcards to increase sight-word reading ability and cover, copy, and compare for spelling for a fifth-grade student with specific learning disabilities. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research, 1, 1–6.
115.
RoneyR.C. (1996). Storytelling in the classroom: Some theoretical thoughts. Storytelling World, 9, 7–9.
116.
SadoskiM. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 21, 221–238.
117.
SadoskiM.PaivioA. (2013). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Taylor and Francis Group.
118.
SaitoK.DewaeleJ.M.HanzawaK. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between motivation and late second language speech learning in classroom settings. Language and Speech, 60, 614–632.
119.
SanettiL.M.H.KratochwillT.R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445–459.
120.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS., et al. (2007). Reading interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
121.
ScanlonD.M.AndersonK.L.SweeneyJ.M. (2017). Early intervention for reading difficulties: The interactive strategies approach. Guilford.
122.
SchmidtR.J.RozendalM.S.GreenmanG.G. (2002). Reading instruction in the inclusion classroom. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 130–140.
123.
SchmittN. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.
124.
SchmittN. (2010). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
125.
SchmittN. (2014). Conceptual review article. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64, 913–951.
126.
SmithB.D.StahlN.NeilJ. (1987). The effect of imagery instruction on vocabulary development. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 20, 131–137.
127.
SnellingsP.Van GelderenA.De GlopperK. (2004). The effect of enhanced lexical retrieval on L2 writing: A classroom experiment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 55, 175–200.
128.
SnowC.E. (1993). Families as social contexts for literacy development. New Directions for Child Development, 61, 11–24.
129.
SolakE.CakirR. (2015). Exploring the effect of materials designed with augmented reality on language learners’ vocabulary learning. Journal of Educators Online, 12, 50–72.
130.
SparksR. (1995). Examining the linguistic coding differences hypothesis to explain individual differences in foreign language learning. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 187–214.
131.
StæhrL. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577–607.
132.
StæhrL.S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading, and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36, 139–152.
133.
StahlS.A.FairbanksM.M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110.
134.
SuggateS.P.LenhardW.NeudeckerE.SchneiderW. (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from stories: Second and fourth graders learn more from listening than reading. First Language, 33, 551–571.
135.
TengF. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading-only and multi-dimensional approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 274–288.
136.
ThompsonI. (1987). Memory in language learning. In WendenA.RubinJ. (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15–30). Prentice-Hall.
137.
TremblayP.F.GardnerR.C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505–520.
138.
UchiharaT.WebbS.YanagisawaA. (2019). The effects of repetition on incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis or correlation studies. Language Learning, 69, 559–599.
139.
VaahtorantaE.SuggateS.JachmannC.LenhartJ.LenhardW. (2017). Can explaining less be more? Enhancing vocabulary through explicit versus elaborative storytelling. First Language, 38, 198–217.
140.
VolpeR.J.CasaleG.MohiyeddiniC., et al. (2018). A universal behavioral screener linked to personalized classroom interventions: Psychometric characteristics in a large sample off German schoolchildren. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 25–40.
141.
WebbS. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 232–245.
142.
WebbS. (2009). The effects of receptive and productive learning of word pairs on vocabulary knowledge. RELC Journal, 40, 360–376.
143.
WebbS.NationI.S.P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
144.
WeißR.H. (2006). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2: Revision (CFT 20-R) mit Wortschatztest und Zahlenfolgentest [Basic Intelligence Test Scale 2: Revision (CFT 20-R) with vocabulary test and number sequence test]. Hogrefe.
145.
WellsG. (2009). The social context of language and literacy development. In BarbarinO.A.WasikB.H. (Eds.), Handbook of child development and early education (pp. 271–302). The Guilford Press.
146.
WellsJ.C.SheeheyP.H.SheeheyM. (2017). Using self-monitoring of performance with self-graphing to increase academic productivity in math. Beyond Behavior, 26, 57–65.
WilliamsK.T. (2007). The expressive vocabulary test. 2nd edition.AGS Publishing.
149.
WilkinsD.A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Edward Arnold.
150.
WillsH.KampsD.AbbottM.BannisterH.KaufmanJ. (2010). Classroom observations and effects of reading interventions for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 103–119.
151.
WillsH.KampsD.FlemingK.HansenB. (2016). Student and teacher outcomes of the class-wide function-related intervention team efficacy trial. Exceptional Children, 83, 58–76.
152.
WoodrowL. (2017) Motivation in language learning. In BreezeR.Sancho GuindaC. (Eds.), Essential competencies for English-medium University teaching: Educational linguistics: Volume 27 (pp. 235–248). Springer. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-40956-6_16.pdf (accessed September 2021).
