Addressing an underappreciated research area, this study reports on how two English language teachers in a Turkish tertiary education context use a global coursebook. At the beginning of the study, a metaphor elicitation task and pre-study interviews were employed to detect the teachers’ coursebook conceptualizations. Then, a total of 12 lessons were video-recorded and adaptations were identified using a research-informed framework developed for this study. The participants examined and evaluated their own practices in stimulated recall sessions, reflective conversations and journal writing. The study was concluded with post-study interviews. Data revealed that the teachers’ instructional practice was driven by the coursebook to a large extent as they stuck to minor adaptations and followed the guidance given by the coursebook. Along with the institutional constraints, the teachers’ practices were influenced by their own personal preferences, attempts to make coursebook tasks accessible to learners, lack of planning and the highly structured delivery of tasks in the coursebook. However, pedagogic considerations were not foregrounded by the teachers. The results of the study call for professional teacher development on coursebook utilization, coursebook-based instead of coursebook-led program planning alongside redesign of coursebooks as resources rather than instructions.
Abdel LatifM.M. (2017). Teaching grammar using inductive and communicative materials: Exploring Egyptian EFL teachers’ practices and beliefs. In MasuharaH.MishanF.TomlinsonB. (Eds.), Practice and theory for materials development in L2 learning (pp. 275–289). Cambridge Scholars.
2.
AkbariR. (2008). Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 641–652.
3.
ArıkanA. (2009). Problems with coursebooks in EFL classrooms: Prospective teachers’ opinions. EKEV Academic Review, 38, 309–317.
4.
BaoD. (2015). Flexibility in second language materials. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 4, 37–52.
5.
BlairE. (2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6, 14–29.
6.
BolsterA. (2014). Materials adaptation of EAP materials by experienced teachers (Part I). Folio, 16(1), 16–22.
7.
BolsterA. (2015). Materials adaptation of EAP materials by experienced teachers (Part II). Folio, 16(2), 16–21.
8.
BorgS. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education. Continuum.
9.
BosompemE.G. (2014). Materials adaptation in Ghana: Teachers’ attitudes and practices. In GartonS.GravesK. (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 104–120). Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
BrownM.W. (2009). The teacher–tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In RemillardJ.THerbel-EisenmannB.ALloydG.M. (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). Routledge.
11.
BrymanA. (2012). Social research methods. 4th edition.Oxford University Press.
12.
ÇakırI. (2015). Instructional materials commonly employed by foreign language teachers at elementary schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8, 69–82.
13.
CampbellE. (2007). Glimpses of uncertainty in teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 37, 1–8.
14.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd edition.Sage.
15.
EngeströmY.SanninoA. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24.
16.
FormanR. (2014). How local teachers respond to the culture and language of a global English as a foreign language textbook. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27, 72–88.
17.
GartonS.GravesK. (2014). Identifying a research agenda for language teaching materials. Modern Language Journal, 98, 654–657.
18.
GrammatosiF.HarwoodN. (2014). An experienced teacher’s use of the textbook on an academic English course: A case study. In HarwoodN. (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 178–204). Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
GrayJ. (2016). ELT materials. In HallG. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 95–108). Routledge.
20.
GuerrettazA.M.JohnstonB. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. Modern Language Journal, 97, 779–796.
21.
GuerrettazA.M.EngmanM.M.MatsumotoA.Y. (2021). Empirically defining language learning and teaching materials in use through sociomaterial perspectives. Modern Language Journal, 105, 3–20.
22.
HarwoodN. (2014). Content, consumption, and production: Three levels of textbook research. In HarwoodN. (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 1–41). Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
HopkinsD. (2008). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. 4th edition.Open University Press.
24.
HumphriesS. (2014). Factors influencing Japanese teachers’ adoption of communication-oriented textbooks. In GartonS.GravesK. (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 253–269). Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
HutchinsonT.TorresE. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48, 315–328.
26.
JordanG.GrayH. (2019). We need to talk about coursebooks. ELT Journal, 73, 438–446.
27.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.
28.
LeV.C. (2020). Remapping the teacher knowledge-base of language teacher education: A Vietnamese perspective. Language Teaching Research, 24, 71–81.
29.
LeeR.N.BathmakerA.M. (2007). The use of English textbooks for teaching English to ‘vocational’ students in Singapore secondary schools: A survey of teachers’ beliefs. RELC Journal, 38, 350–374.
30.
LiZ. (2020). Language teachers at work. Springer.
31.
LiZ.HarfittG. (2017). An examination of language teachers’ enactment of curriculum materials in the context of a centralised curriculum. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25, 403–416.
32.
LiZ.HarfittG. (2018). Understanding language teachers’ enactment of content through the use of centralized curriculum materials. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46, 461–477.
33.
LittlejohnA. (2012). Language teaching materials and the (very) big picture. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9, 283–297.
34.
LohJ.RenandyaW.A. (2016). Exploring adaptations of materials and methods. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 4, 93–11.
35.
MaleyA. (2011). Squaring the circle – reconciling materials as constraint with materials as empowerment. In TomlinsonB. (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 379–402). 2nd edition.Cambridge University Press.
36.
MasonA.PayantC. (2019). Experienced teachers’ beliefs and practices toward communicative approaches in teaching English as a foreign language in rural Ukraine. TESOL Journal, 10, e0377.
McDonoughJ.ShawC.MasuharaH. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT. 3rd edition.Wiley-Blackwell.
39.
McGrathI. (2006a). Teachers’ and learners’ images for coursebooks. ELT Journal, 60, 171–180.
40.
McGrathI. (2006b). Using insights from teachers’ metaphors. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32, 303–317.
41.
McGrathI. (2013). Teaching materials and the role of EFL/ESL teachers. Bloomsbury.
42.
McGrathI. (2016). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. 2nd edition.Edinburgh University Press.
43.
MenkabuA.Harwood.N. (2014). Teachers conceptualization and use of the textbook on a medical English course. In HarwoodN. (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 145–177). Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
MitchellH.Q.MalkogianniM. (2015). Pioneer pre-intermediate: Teacher’s book. MM Publications.
45.
MitchellH.Q.MalkogianniM. (2016). Pioneer intermediate B1: Teacher’s book. MM Publications.
46.
MoradkhaniS.HaghiS. (2017). Context-based sources of EFL teachers’ self-efficacy: Iranian public schools versus private institutes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 259–269.
47.
MustafaM.CullingfordC. (2008). Teacher autonomy and centralized control: The case of textbooks. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 81–88.
48.
PattonM.Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 4th edition.Sage.
49.
PinnerR. (2018). Authenticity and ideology: Creating a culture of authenticity through reflecting on purposes for learning and teaching. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 7–24.
50.
PouromidS.AmerianM. (2018). Iranian and Japanese language teachers’ operationalization of materials mode and their pursuit of immunity. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 15, 5–22.
51.
RemillardJ.T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246.
52.
RichardJ.C. (1998). Beyond training. Cambridge University Press.
53.
RichardsJ.C.FarrellT.S.C. (2011). Practice teaching. Cambridge University Press.
54.
SammlerS. (2018). History of the school textbook. In FuchsE.BockA. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of textbook studies (pp. 13–23). Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
SampsonN. (2009). Teaching materials and the autonomous language teacher: A study of tertiary English teachers in Hong Kong. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
56.
SeferajK. (2014). Coping with new teaching approaches and materials: An East-European EFL teacher’s interpretation of communicative teaching activities. In GartonS.GravesK. (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 89–103). Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
ShawerS.F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173–184.
58.
ShawerS.F. (2017). Teacher-driven curriculum development at the classroom level: Implications for curriculum, pedagogy and teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 296–313.
59.
StemlerS. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7, 137–146.
60.
StoffelsN.T. (2005). ‘Sir, on what page is the answer?’ Exploring teacher decision-making during complex curriculum change, with specific reference to the use of learner support material. International Journal of Educational Development, 25, 531–546.
61.
TasseronM. (2017). How teachers use the global ELT coursebook. In MasuharaH.MishanF.TomlinsonB. (Eds.), Practice and theory for materials development in L2 learning (pp. 290–311). Cambridge Scholars.
62.
TomlinsonB. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45, 143–179.
63.
TomlinsonB.MasuharaH. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. Wiley Blackwell.
64.
UrP. (2015). Using the coursebook: A teacher’s perspective. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 4, 1–17.
65.
VygotskyL.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Havard University Press.
66.
WrightA. (2015). Medium: Companion or slave? In MaleyA.PeacheyN. (Eds.), Creativity in the English language classroom (pp. 14–23). British Council.
