Effects of textual enhancement and task manipulation on L2 learners’ attentional processes and grammatical knowledge development: A mixed methods study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2024
Effects of textual enhancement and task manipulation on L2 learners’ attentional processes and grammatical knowledge development: A mixed methods study
This study examined the extent to which textual enhancement and task manipulation affect the learners’ attentional processing and the development of second language (L2) grammatical knowledge. A total of 73 Korean college students read an opinion news article in one of four experimental conditions: (1) textually enhanced, careful reading, (2) textually enhanced, expeditious reading, (3) textually non-enhanced, careful reading, and (4) textually non-enhanced, expeditious reading. For the enhanced conditions, the target L2 construction, i.e. the use of English participle phrases in the restrictive use, was typographically enhanced using a different color. In addition, the reading task was manipulated in terms of the speed and the manner of reading, i.e. careful reading to remember textual information as accurately as possible or expeditious reading to figure out the gist as soon as possible. While reading the article, learners’ eye-movements were recorded with an eye-tracker to measure the allocation of attentional resources as well as reading processes. In addition, stimulated recalls were collected for qualitative analysis of learners’ attentional processes. The results revealed that both textual enhancement and task manipulation had significant effects on the way participants allocated their attentional resources during reading, while it did not affect their knowledge of the target constructions as reflected in their grammaticality judgment scores.
BrunfautT.McCrayG. (2015). Looking into test-takers’ cognitive processing whilst completing reading tasks: A mixed-method eye-tracking and stimulated recall study. ARAGs Research Reports: Online, volume 1, number 1. London: British Council.
3.
ChoD.W.ParkJ. (2015). Supplementive participle clauses in science journal papers by Korean graduate students: A corpus-based study for pedagogical purposes. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 12, 1–36.
4.
ChoiS. (2017). Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21, 403–426.
5.
Cintrón-ValentínM.García-AmayaL.EllisN.C. (2019). Captioning and grammar learning in the L2 Spanish classroom. The Language Learning Journal, 47, 439–459.
6.
CobbT. (n.d.). The compleat lexical tutor. Available at: https://www.lextutor.ca/vp (accessed July 2021).
7.
ConklinK.Pellicer-SánchezA.CarrolG. (2018). Eye-tracking: A guide for applied linguistics research. Cambridge University Press.
8.
DoughtyC.WilliamsJ. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In DoughtyC.J.WilliamsJ. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–261). Cambridge University Press.
9.
HanZ.ParkE.S.CombsC. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29, 597–618.
10.
HooverW.A.TunmerW.E. (1993). The components of reading. In ThompsonG.B.TunmerW.E.NicholsonT. (Eds.), Reading acquisition processes (pp. 1–19). Multilingual Matters.
11.
IndrarathneB.KormosJ. (2017). Attentional processing of input in explicit and implicit learning conditions: an eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 401–430.
12.
IssaB.Morgan-ShortK.VillegasB.RaneyG. (2015). An eye-tracking study on the role of attention and its relationship with motivation. EUROSLA Yearbook, 15, 114–142.
13.
IzumiS. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541–577.
14.
JungJ. (2020). The impact of glossing and reading activity characteristics on L2 development. Language Teaching Research. DOI: 10.1177/1362168820911198.
15.
JungJ.RévészA. (2018). The effects of reading activity characteristics on L2 reading processes and noticing of glossed constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 755–780.
16.
LaBrozziR.M. (2016). The effects of textual enhancement type on L2 form recognition and reading comprehension in Spanish. Language Teaching Research, 20, 75–91.
17.
LabrozziR.M.VillegasA. (2020). The effects of dynamic visual enhancement and working memory on the recall of Spanish vocabulary. Hispania, 103, 245–258.
18.
LeeM.RévészA. (2018). Promoting grammatical development through textually enhanced captions: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 557–577.
19.
LeeM.RévészA. (2020). Promoting grammatical development through captions and textual enhancement in multimodal input-based tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 625–651.
20.
LeeS.K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ analytic review. Language Learning, 57, 87–118.
21.
LeeS.K.HuangH.T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307–331.
22.
LeowR.P. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers’ comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151–182.
23.
LeowR.P. (2001). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 51, 113–155.
24.
LeowR.P. (2009). Input enhancement and L2 grammatical development: What the research reveals. In Watzinger-TharpJ.KatzS.L. (Eds.), Conceptions of L2 grammar: Theoretical approaches and their application in the L2 classroom (pp. 16–34). Heinle.
25.
LeowR.P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom. Routledge.
26.
LeowR.P.EgiT.NuevoA.M.TsaiY. (2003). The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners’ comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1–16.
27.
LeowR.P.GreyS.MarijuanS.MoormanC. (2014). Concurrent data elicitation procedures, processes, and the early stages of L2 learning: A critical overview. Second Language Research, 30, 111–127.
28.
LinH.ChenT. (2007). Reading authentic ELF text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment. Language Learning and Technology, 11, 83–106.
29.
LoewenL.InceogluS. (2016). The effectiveness of visual input enhancement on the noticing and L2 development of the Spanish past tense. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 89–110.
30.
LongM. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In deBotK.KramschC.GinsbergR., (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamin.
31.
MackeyA. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405–430.
32.
MeguroY. (2019). Textual enhancement, grammar learning, reading comprehension, and tag questions. Language Teaching Research, 23, 58–77.
33.
Montero PerezM.PetersE.DesmetP. (2015). Enhancing vocabulary learning through captioned Video: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 308–328.
34.
NorouzianR.PlonskyL. (2018). Eta-and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34, 257–271.
35.
OverstreetM.H. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229–258
36.
Pellicer-SánchezA. (2016). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 19, 1–22.
37.
PlonskyL.OswaldF.L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
38.
RaneyG.E.CampbellS.J.BoveeJ.C. (2014). Using eye movements to evaluate the cognitive processes involved in text comprehension. Journal of Visual Experimentation, 83, e50780.
39.
RassaeiE. (2020). The separate and combined effects of recasts and textual enhancement as two focus on form techniques on L2 development. System, 89, 102193.
40.
RaynerK. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.
41.
RobinsonP. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed condition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223–247.
42.
Sharwood SmithM. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learners. Second Language Research, 7, 118–132.
43.
Sharwood SmithM. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.
44.
SimardD.FoucambertD. (2013). Observing noticing while reading in L2. In BergsleithnerJ.M.FrotaS.N.YoshiokaJ.K. (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 207–226). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai`i at Mānoa.
45.
WinkeP. (2013). The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension: A modified replication of Lee (2007) with eye-movement data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 323–352.
