As one type of the most extensively used sentences, English questions are must-learn grammatical structures for learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). However, it is commonly seen that English learners across proficiency levels produce ungrammatical English questions. To determine the source of learners’ erroneous production, we conducted a written test to collect hands-on data of four types of English questions produced by 81 Chinese EFL preliminary learners. Learners’ achievement scores showed that learners from both higher and lower proficiency groups had similar difficulty producing questions. The statistics also showed morphosyntactic inconsistencies in learners’ production were congregating on auxiliaries’ choice and tense variation. Cross-linguistic transfer from first language (L1) in English question acquisition for Chinese EFL learners was measured against the three dimensions of Jarvis’ (2000) methodological model. Influence from learners’ L1 was found to be related to preliminary learners’ morphosyntactic inconsistencies. The findings suggest that practitioners in an EFL context should raise learners’ grammatical consciousness, and design production-oriented tasks, to improve learners’ morphosyntactic accuracy in English question formation.
AmbridgeB.RowlandC.F.GummeryA. (2020). Teaching the unlearnable: A training study of complex yes/no questions. Language and Cognition, 12, 385–410.
2.
Bardovi-HarligK.BofmanT. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17–34.
3.
BrownR. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
ChanA.Y.W. (2004). Syntactic transfer: Evidence from the interlanguage of Hong Kong Chinese ESL learners. Modern Language Journal, 88, 56–74.
5.
CorderS.P. (1975). Error analysis, interlanguage and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 8, 201–218.
6.
CowanR. (2008). The teachers’ grammar of English. Cambridge University Press.
7.
DowensM.G.GuoT.GuoJ.BarberH.CarreirasM. (2011). Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish: Evidence from event related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1651–1659.
8.
DulayH.C.BurtM.K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax?Language Learning, 23, 245–258.
9.
EckmanF.R. (1985). Some theoretical and pedagogical implications of the markedness differential hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 289–307.
10.
EllisN.C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.
11.
EllisR. (1984). Can syntax be taught? A study of the effects of formal instruction on the acquisition of WH questions by children. Applied Linguistics, 5, 138–155.
12.
EllisR. (2002). Grammar teaching. Practice or consciousness-raising? In RichardsJ.C.RenandyaW.A. (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 167–174). Cambridge University Press.
13.
EllisR. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.
14.
EllisR. (2009). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In EllisR.LoewenS.C.Elder, et al. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Multilingual Matters.
15.
EllisR. (2017). The study of second language acquisition. 2nd edition.Oxford University Press.
16.
EskildsenS.W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 65, 33–62.
17.
FotosS. (2002). Structure-based interactive tasks for the EFL grammar learner. In HinkelE.FotosS. (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 135–154). Taylor & Francis.
18.
GassS. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327–344.
19.
GuastiM.T.BranchiniC.ArosioF. (2012). Interference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 185–223.
20.
HawkinsR.LiszkaS. (2003). Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In van HoutR.AafkeH.KuikenF., et al. (Eds.), The interface between syntax and lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 21–44). Benjamins.
21.
IoninT.MontrulS. (2010). The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English. Language Learning, 60, 877–925.
22.
JarvisS. (2000). Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50, 245–309.
23.
KrashenS.D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon.
24.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48, 263–280.
25.
LeeJ.F.K. (2016). ‘Why you can’t ask a proper question?’: The learning difficulties of Hong Kong ESL students. RELC Journal, 47, 295–311.
26.
LennonP. (1991). Error: Some problems of definition, identification, and distinction. Applied Linguistics, 12, 180–196.
27.
McDonoughK.KimY. (2009). Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 386–398.
28.
McDonoughK.MackeyA. (2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 31–47.
29.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2017). The English curriculum criteria for compulsory education. People’s Education Press.
30.
NassajiH.FotosS. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126–145.
31.
NassajiH.SwainM. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34–51.
32.
PozzanL. (2011). Asking questions in learner English: First and second language acquisition of main and embedded interrogative structures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The City University of New York, New York, USA.
33.
RichardsJ.C.ReppenR. (2014). Towards a pedagogy of grammar instruction. RELC Journal, 45, 5–25.
SpadaN.LightbownP.M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 1–22.
36.
SuzukiY.DeKeyserR. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67, 747–790.
37.
ThewissenJ. (2013). Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns: Insights from an error-tagged EFL learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 77–101.
38.
WenQ. (2016). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China. Language Teaching, 51, 526–540.
39.
ZhangR. (2015). Measuring university-level L2 learners implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 457–486.
40.
ZhuC.WuX. (2011). A study of yes/no questions in English and Chinese: With special reference to Chinese EFL learners’ understanding of their forms and functions. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 632–647.
