Despite the growing interest in incorporating textual glosses into second language (L2) reading in hypermedia and paper media, no agreements have been reached as to whether and what extent a textual gloss facilitates L2 learners’ vocabulary acquisition in hypermedia and paper media. The present study meta-analysed the overall effects of textual glosses and different glossing types (i.e. language, location, and mode) on L2 vocabulary acquisition, as well as the moderation effects on the variability of L2 vocabulary acquisition effect sizes. Based on a comprehensive search, 20 studies involving 2,291 participants that have quantitatively documented the changes of L2 vocabulary gains through a pre-and-post textual glosses design were identified and coded in order to retrieve moderator variables. The results show the following: (1) textual glossing has a medium effect on L2 vocabulary acquisition; (2) the effect of textual glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition persists over time; (3) glossing location and glossing mode significantly impact the effect of textual glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition but glossing language has no definite effect; and (4) outcome measure is the only moderator variable among the three influencing factors on vocabulary acquisition. These results are further discussed with reference to existing studies and theory of second language acquisition.
AbrahamL.B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 199–226.
2.
AbuSeileekA.F. (2011). Hypermedia annotation presentation: The effect of location and type on the EFL learners’ achievement in reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. Computers & Education, 57, 1281–1291.
3.
AkbulutY. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35, 499–517.
4.
Al-seghayerK. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5, 202–232.
5.
BoersF.WarrenP.HeL.DeconinckJ. (2017). Does adding pictures to glosses enhance vocabulary uptake from reading?System, 66, 113–129.
6.
BoersF.WarrenP.GrimshawG.Siyanova-ChanturiaA. (2017). On the benefits of multimodal annotations for vocabulary uptake from reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 709–725.
7.
BorensteinM.HedgesL.V.HigginsJ.P.T.RothsteinH.R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
BowlesM.A. (2004). L2 glossing: To CALL or Not to CALL. Hispania, 87, 541–552.
9.
BrutonA. (2007). Vocabulary learning from dictionary reference in collaborative EFL translational writing. System, 35, 353–367.
10.
ÇakmakF.ErçetinG. (2018). Effects of gloss type on text recall and incidental vocabulary learning in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30, 24–47.
11.
ChenI.-J. (2014). Hypertext glosses for foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition: Effects of assessment methods. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 413–426.
12.
ChenI.-J.YenJ.-C. (2013). Hypertext annotation: Effects of presentation formats and learner proficiency on reading comprehension and vocabulary learning in foreign languages. Computers & Education, 63, 416–423.
13.
ChengY.-H.GoodR.L. (2009). L1 glosses: Effects on EFL learners’ reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 119–142.
14.
ChoiS. (2016). Effects of L1 and L2 glosses on incidental vocabulary acquisition and lexical representations. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 137–143.
15.
ChunD.PlassJ. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 80, 183–212.
16.
Claudia GuidiM.S. (2009). Glossing for meaning and glossing for form. A computerized study of the effects of glossing and type of linguistic item on reading comprehension, noticing, and l2 learning. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
17.
CooperH.HedgesL.V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
DaneshT.FarvardinM.T. (2016). A comparative study of the effects of different glossing conditions on EFL learners’ vocabulary Recall. SAGE Open, 6, 1–11.
19.
FergusonJ.L. (2009). Explicit second language vocabulary learning: An investigation of a gloss-embedded text plus form, meaning, and use exercises. Unpublished PhD dissertation, College of the Liberal Arts, University Park, PA, USA.
20.
GassS.M.MaddenC.G. (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21.
GilmoreA. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40, 97–118.
22.
GlassG.V. (2016). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.
23.
HuangH. (2018). Computer multimedia aided word annotation for incidental vocabulary acquisition in English Reading. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18, 3417–3427.
24.
HuangL.LinC. (2014). Three approaches to glossing and their effects on vocabulary learning. System, 44, 127–136.
25.
HulstijnJ.H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P.J.LB.H. Arnaud. (Ed.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113–125). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
HulstijnJ.H.HollanderM.GreidanusT. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 327–339.
27.
JacobsG.M.DufonP.HongF.C. (1994). L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading, 17, 19–28.
28.
JungJ. (2015). Effects of glosses on learning of L2 grammar and vocabulary. Language Teaching Research, 20, 92–112.
29.
KoM.H. (2012). Glossing and second language vocabulary learning. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 56–79.
30.
KrashenS. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440–464.
31.
LauferB.HulstijnJ. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26.
32.
LeeH.LeeJ.H. (2015). The effects of electronic glossing types on foreign language vocabulary learning: Different types of format and glossary information. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 591–601.
33.
LeeH.LeeH.LeeJ.H. (2016). Evaluation of electronic and paper textual glosses on second language vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 499–507.
34.
LeeH.WarschauerM.LeeJ.H. (2017). The effects of concordance-based electronic glosses on L2 vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21, 32–51.
35.
LewisM. (1997). Pedagogical implications of the lexical approach. In CoadyJ.HuckinT. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rational for pedagogy (pp. 255–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LiS. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365.
37.
LipseyM.W.WilsonD.B. (2001). Applied social research methods series: Volume 49: Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Lyman-HagerM.DavisN.BurnettJ.ChennaultR. (1993). Us vie de boy: Interactive reading in French. In BorchardtF.L.JohnsonE.M.T. (Eds.), Proceedings of CALICO 1993 Annual Symposium on Assessment (pp. 93–97). Durham, NC: Duke University.
39.
MearaP. (1990). A note on passive vocabulary. Second Language Research, 6, 150–154.
40.
MiyasakoN. (2002). Does text-glossing have any effects on incidental vocabulary learning through reading for Japanese senior high school students?Language Education & Technology, 39, 1–20.
41.
NagataN. (1999). The effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 469–479.
42.
NationI.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
NorrisJ.M.OrtegaL. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In NorrisJ.M.OrtegaL. (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3–52). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
44.
O’DonnellM.E. (2012). Second language learners’ use of marginal glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 543–563.
45.
PetersE.HulstijnJ.H.SercuL.LutjeharmsM. (2009). Learning L2 German vocabulary through reading: The effect of three enhancement techniques compared. Language Learning, 59, 113–151.
46.
PlonskyL.OswaldF.L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
47.
SalemE.B. (2006). The influence of electronic glosses on word retention and reading comprehension with Spanish language learners. Kansas City, KS: The University of Kansas.
48.
SawilowskyS.S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8, 597–599.
49.
SchmittN. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64, 913–951.
50.
SmithM.S. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.
51.
SterneJ.A.C.HarbordR.M. (2018). Funnel plots in meta-analysis. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 4, 127–141.
52.
TürkE.ErçetinG. (2012). Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 1–25.
53.
VahediV.S.GhonsoolyB.PishghadamR. (2016). Vocabulary glossing: A meta-analysis of the relative effectiveness of different gloss types on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Teaching English with Technology, 16, 3–25.
54.
WangJ. (2011). The use of e-dictionary to read e-text by intermediate and advanced learners of Chinese. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 475–487.
55.
WatanabeY. (1997). Input, intake and retention: Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 287–307.
56.
YanagisawaA.WebbS.UchiharaT. (2020). How do different forms of glossing contribute to l2 vocabulary learning from reading?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 411–438.
57.
YanguasI. (2009). Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Lanaguge Learning & Technology, 13, 48–67.
58.
YoshiiM. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: Their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Lanaguge Learning & Technology, 10, 85–101.
59.
YunJ.H. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 39–58.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
