The acquisition of communicative competence in second and foreign languages requires the incorporation of verbal and non-verbal elements. Notwithstanding, few studies have performed empirical research into the acquisition of non-verbal signs. This research studies the learning of emblematic gestures for students of Spanish in the USA using an evolutionary analysis after instruction. Interactions between types of gestures (common, different, and unique) based on the similarities with the first language and learning mechanisms in free and guided comprehension and production tasks are taken into account. The results indicate that although the detection and production of emblems improve with instruction, the progress is unequal: the categories different and unique obtain a higher rate of improvement than common emblems in specific tasks. In conclusion, it is essential for the teaching of gestures and non-verbal communication to consider, along with the non-verbal target language code, the non-verbal mother tongue code.
ACTFL (2012) ACTFL performance descriptors for language learners. Alexandria, VA: The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
2.
ACTFL (2015). ACTFL performance descriptors for language learners. Alexandria, VA: The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
3.
AndersenR. (1990). Models, processes, principles and strategies: Second language acquisition inside and outside the classroom. In Van PattenB.LeeJ. (Eds.), Second language acquisition: Foreign language learning (pp. 45–68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
4.
AntesT.A. (1996). Kinesics: The value of gesture in language and in the language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 173–176.
5.
BarakatR.A. (1973). Arabic gestures. Journal of Popular Culture, 6, 749–787.
6.
Belío-ApaolazaH.S. (2018). Aprendizaje y evaluación de la comunicación no verbal en ELE: Propuesta teórica y estudio empírico sobre los gestos emblemáticos [Learning and evaluation of non-verbal communication in ELE (Spanish as a foreign language): Theoretical proposal and empirical study about emblematic gestures]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
7.
Belío-ApaolazaH.S. (2019). La enseñanza de los gestos emblemáticos en la competencia léxico-semántica: Una propuesta para el aula de ELE [Teaching emblematic gestures within lexical competence: A proposal for the Spanish as a foreign language classroom]. Revista Internacional de Lenguas Extranjeras, 12, 1–25.
8.
BergmannK.KoppS. (2012). Gestural alignment in natural dialogue. In CooperR.P.PeeblesD.MiyakeN. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2012) (pp. 1326–1331). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
9.
BettiS.CostaV.V. (2006). Para una didáctica contrastiva del lenguaje gestual [For a contrastive didactics of gesture language]. In Balsameda MaestuE. (Ed.), Las destrezas orales en la enseñanza del español como L2-LE: Actas del XVII Congreso Internacional de ASELE, Universidad de La Rioja (27–30 /09/2006 Logroño (pp. 365–377). Logroño: Universidad de la Rioja.
10.
BirdwhistellR.L. (1952). Introduction to kinesics: an annotation system for analysis of body motion and gesture. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
11.
Cabañas MartínezM.J. (2005). Comunicación no verbal y enseñanza de español como segunda lengua a inmigrantes en contextos escolares [Non-verbal communication and teaching of Spanish as a second language to immigrants in school contexts]. Interlingüística, 16, 225–236.
12.
CalbrisG. (1981). Etude des expressions mimiques conventionnelles françaises dans le cadre d’une communication non verbale testées sur des Hongrois [Study of conventional French gestural expressions in the context of non-verbal communication testing on Hungarians]. Semiotica, 35, 125–156.
13.
CalbrisG. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
14.
CapperS. (2000). Nonverbal communication and the second language learner: Some pedagogic considerations. The Language Teaching Online, 24, 19–23.
15.
CesteroA.M. (1998). El estudio de la comunicación no verbal y su aplicación a la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras [The study of non-verbal communication and its application to the teaching of foreign languages]. In CesteroA.M. (Ed.), Estudios de Comunicación no verbal (pp. 7–16). Madrid: Edinumen.
16.
CesteroA.M. (1999). La comunicación no verbal y enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras [Non-verbal communication and teaching of foreign languages]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
17.
CesteroA.M. (2004). La comunicación no verbal [Non-verbal communication]. In Sánchez LobatoJ.Santos GargalloI. (Eds.), Vademecum para la formación de profesores: Enseñar español como segunda lengua (L2) / lengua extranjera (LE) (pp. 593–618). Alcobendas: SGEL.
18.
CesteroA.M. (2017a). La comunicación no verbal [Non-verbal communication]. In Cestero ManceraA.M.Penadés MartínezI. (Eds.), Manual del profesor de ELE (pp. 1051–1122). Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá.
19.
CesteroA.M. (2017b). Comunicación no verbal y diversidad cultural: Necesidades y recursos en EL2 y ELE [Non-verbal communication and cultural diversity: Needs and resources in L2 Spanish and FL Spanish]. In NíklevaD.G. (Ed.), Necesidades y tendencias en la formación del profesorado de español como lengua extranjera (pp. 339–382). Bern: Peter Lang.
20.
CesteroA.M.GilM. (1995). Comunicación no verbal: algunas diferencias culturales en la concepción, la estructuración y el uso del tiempo en India y en España, I [Non-verbal communication: Some cultural differences in the conception, structuring, and use of time in India and Spain, I]. Cuadernos Cervantes, 4, 62–66.
21.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
CohenA.D. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language. 2nd edition.Harlow: Pearson, Longman.
23.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
24.
Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of references for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
25.
DominiqueN. (2008). Inventario de emblemas gestuales españoles y brasileños [Inventory of Spanish and Brazilian gestural emblems]. Language Design, 10, 5–75.
26.
EfronD. (1941). Gesture and environment. New York: King’s Crown Press.
27.
EfronD. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. The Hague: Mouton Press.
28.
EkmanP.FriesenW. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origin, usage and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.
29.
EkmanP. (2004). Emotional and conversational nonverbal signals. In LarrazábalJ.M.Pérez MirandaL.A. (Eds.), Language, knowledge, and representation (pp. 39–50). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
30.
FieldA. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
31.
GullebergM. (2010), Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 26, 75–102.
32.
GullbergM.McCaffertyS.G. (2008). Introduction to gesture and SLA: toward an integrated approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 133–146.
33.
HallE.T. (1973). La dimensión oculta: Enfoque antropológico del uso del espacio [The hidden dimension: Anthropological approach to the use of space]. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios de Administración local.
34.
HallE.T.HallM.R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
35.
Hamiru-aqui, & ChangA. (2004). 70 Japanese gestures: No language communication. Tokyo: IBC Publishing.
36.
HarrisonP.A. (1983). Behaving Brazilian: A comparison of Brazilian and North American social behavior. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
37.
HaugeE. (1998). Gesture in the EFL class: An aid to communication or a source of confusion? In KillickD.ParryM. (Eds.), Cross-cultural capability: The why, the ways and the means: New theories and methodologies in language education, proceedings of the conference at Leeds Metropolitan University, December 1997 (pp. 271–280). Glasgow: University of Glasgow French and German Publications.
38.
HaugeE. (1999). Some common emblems used by British English teachers in EFL classes. In KillickD.ParryM. (Eds.), Cross-cultural capability: Promoting the discipline: Marking boundaries and crossing borders proceedings of the conference at Leeds Metropolitan University, December 1998 (pp. 405–420). Glasgow: University of Glasgow French and German Publications.
39.
HollerJ.WilkinK. (2011). Co-speech gesture mimicry in the process of collaborative referring during face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35, 133–153.
40.
Instituto Cervantes. (2006). Plan curricular del Instituto Cervantes: Niveles de referencia para el español [Instituto Cervantes Curricular Plan: Levels of reference for Spanish]. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes – Biblioteca Nueva.
41.
JohnsonH.G.EkmanP.FriesenW.V. (1975). Communicative body movements: American emblems. Semiotica, 15, 335–353.
42.
JungheimN.O. (1991). A Study on the classroom acquisition of gestures in Japan. The Journal of Ryutsu Keizai University, 27, 61–68.
43.
JungheimN.O. (1994). Assessing the nonverbal ability of foreign language learners. Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA.
44.
JungheimN.O. (1995). Assessing the unsaid: The development of tests of nonverbal ability. In BrownJ.D.YamashitaS.O. (Eds.), Language testing in Japan (pp. 149–163). Tokyo: JALT – The Japan Association for Language Teaching.
45.
JungheimN.O. (2008). Japanese learner and native speaker perceptions of Japanese refusal gestures portrayed in video. In McCaffertyS.G.StamG. (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp: 157–182). London: Routledge.
46.
KitaS. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 145–167.
47.
KrashenS. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
48.
Larson-HallJ. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge.
49.
LiddicoatA.ScarinoA. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
50.
Martín MartínJ.M. (2005). La adquisición de la lengua maternal (L1) y el aprendizaje de una segunda lengua (L2) / lengua extranjera (LE): Procesos cognitivos y factores condicionantes [The acquisition of the mother tongue (L1) and the learning of a second language (L2) / foreign language (FL): Cognitive processes and conditioning factors]. In Sánchez LobatoJ.Santos GargalloI. (Eds.), Vademecum para la formación de profesores: Enseñar español como segunda lengua (L2) / lengua extranjera (LE) (pp. 261–286). Alcobendas: SGEL.
51.
MatsumotoD.HwangH.C. (2013). Cultural similarities and differences in emblematic gestures. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 37, 1–27.
52.
McLaughlinB. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Méndez GuerreroB. (2016). El componente no verbal en el aula de ELE: Consideraciones para su aprendizaje significativo e intercultural a partir de WebQuest [The non-verbal component in the Spanish as a foreign language classroom. Considerations for a meaningful and cross-cultural learning through WebQuest]. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada a la Enseñanza de las Lenguas, 20, 1–14.
55.
Meo-ZilioG.MejíaS. (1980). Diccionario de gestos: España e Hispanoamérica: Volumen I [Dictionary of gestures: Spain and Latin America, Volume I]. Bogota: Insituto Caro Cuervo.
56.
Meo-ZilioG.MejíaS. (1983). Diccionario de gestos: España e Hispanoamérica, Volumen II [Dictionary of gestures: Spain and Latin America, Volume II]. Bogota: Insituto Caro Cuervo.
57.
MohanB.HelmerS. (1988). Context and second language development: Preschoolers’ comprehension of gestures. Applied Linguistics, 9, 275–292.
58.
MolL.KrahmerE.MaesA.SwertsM. (2012). Adaptation in gesture: Converging hands or converging minds?Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 249–264.
59.
MorrisD.ColletP.MarshP.O’ShaughnessyM. (1979). Gestures: Their origin and distribution. New York: Stein and Day Publisher.
60.
NCSSFL-ACTFL. (2014). Intercultural can-do statements. Alexandria, VA: The National Council of State Supervisors for Languages and The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
61.
NCSSFL-ACTFL (2017). NCSSFL-ACTFL can do statements. Alexandria, VA: The National Council of State Supervisors for Languages and The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
62.
O’SullivanB. (1995). Evaluating gesture production and recognition. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education (Okayama University, 99, 231–242.
63.
O’SullivanB. (1996). The evaluation of gestures in non-verbal communication. In van TroyerG.CornwellS.MorikawaH. (Eds.), JALT 95: Curriculum and evaluation: Proceedings of the JALT International Conference on Language Teaching/Learning (22nd, Nagoya, Japan, November 1995) (pp. 302–306). Tokyo: JALT – The Japan Association for Language Teaching.
64.
PallantJ. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
65.
ParadisM. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In EllisN. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–419). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66.
ParrillF.KimbaraI. (2006). Seeing and hearing double: The influence of mimicry in speech and gesture on observers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 157–166.
67.
PayratòL. (2003). What does ‘the same gesture’ mean? A reflection on emblems, their organization and their interpretation. In RectorM.PoggiI.TrigoN. (Eds.), Gestures, meaning and use (pp. 73–81). Porto: Fernando Pessoa University Press.
68.
PoyatosF. (1994a). La comunicación no verbal I: Cultura, lenguaje y conversación [Non-verbal communication I: Culture, language, and conversation]. Madrid: Istmo.
69.
PoyatosF. (1994b). La comunicación no verbal II: Paralenguaje, kinésica e interacción [Non-verbal communication II: Paralanguage, kinesics, and interaction]. Madrid: Istmo.
70.
PoyatosF. (2017). La comunicación no verbal en la enseñanza integral del español como lengua extranjera [Non-verbal communication in the comprehensive teaching of Spanish as a foreign language]. Monograph series on materials for teaching Spanish as a foreign language. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá Servicio de Publicaciones.
RiversW. (1983). Communicating naturally in a second language: Theory and practice in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
SaitzR.L.CervenkaE.J. (1962). Colombian and North American gestures: A contrastive inventory. Bogota: Centro Colombo Americano.
74.
SaitzR.L.CervenkaE.J. (1972). Handbook of gestures: Colombia and the United States. La Haya: Mouton.
75.
SalvatoG. (2011). The interpretation of emblematic gestures in L2 users of Italian. In CookV.BassettiB. (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (pp. 385–405). Hove: Psychology Press.
76.
SchmidtS. (2013). Proxémica y comunicación intercultural: la comunicación no verbal en la enseñanza de E/LE [Proxemics and intercultural communication: Non-verbal communication in teaching Spanish / Spanish as a foreign language]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitàt Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
77.
SimeD. (2001). The use and perception of illustrators in the foreign language classroom. In CavéC.GuaïtellaI.SantiS. (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication [Orality and gestures: Multimodal interactions and behaviors in communication] (pp. 582–585). Paris: L’Harmattan,
78.
SoudekM.SoudekL.I. (1985). Non-verbal channels in language learning. ELT Journal Volume, 39, 109–114.
79.
TaylorH.M. (1980). Beyond words: nonverbal communication in EFL. In CroftK. (Ed.), Readings on English as a second language: For teachers and teacher trainees (pp. 559–551). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
80.
TellierM.CadetL. (2013). Dans la peau d’un natif: Etat des lieux sur l’enseignement des gestes culturels [In the skin of a native: State of the art on the teaching of cultural gestures]. La Revue Française d’Éducation Comparée, 9, 111–140.
81.
TrofimovichP.McDonoughK. (2011). Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research. Amsterdam / Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
82.
UedaH. (1998). Semántica de los gestos españoles [Semantics of Spanish gestures]. Lingüística Hispánica, 20, 165–182.
83.
WatsonO.M. (1970). Proxemic behavior: A cross cultural study. The Hague: Mouton.
84.
WatsonO.M.GravesT.D. (1966). Quantitative research in proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 68, 971–985.
85.
YapD.F.SoW.C.YapJ.M.TanY.Q.TeohR.S. (2010). Iconic gestures prime words. Cognitive Science, 35, 171–183.
