There are many ways that people come together for the purpose of making music, each offering different opportunities for interaction and exhibiting different communicative characteristics. Through the study of one-to-one instrumental music lessons featuring the clarinet, we find that student and tutor musical contributions are organized using aspects of conversational turn-taking. Short fragments of music, which are characteristic of lesson activity, can also function as turns in themselves as student-tutor dialogue unfolds. When the medium for communication is changed and we analyse video mediated music lessons, these mechanisms are less effective, revealing the importance of this organization to lesson flow, and to musical interaction more generally.
AnsdellG.PavlicevicM. (2005). Musical companionship, musical community. Music therapy and the process and value of musical communication. In MiellD.MacDonaldR. A. R.HargreavesD. J. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 193–213). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
BavelasJ.GerwingJ. (2007). Conversational hand gestures and facial displays in face-to-face dialogue. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 283–306). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
BroughtonM.StevensC. (2009). Music, movement and marimba: An investigation of the role of movement and gesture in communicating musical expression to an audience. Psychology of Music, 37(2), 137–153.
5.
ClarkH. H.BrennanS. E. (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. In ResnickL. B.LevineJ. M.TeasleyS. D. (Eds.), Grounding in communication (Vol. 13, pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
ClarkH. H.KrychM. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 62–81.
7.
DavidsonJ. W.GoodJ. M. M. (2002). Social and musical co-ordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study. Psychology of Music, 30(2), 186–201.
8.
DuffyS.HealeyP. G. T. (2012, August). Spatial co-ordination in music tuition. In MiyakeN.PeeblesD.CooperR. P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1512–1517). Sapporo: Cognitive Science Society.
9.
DuffyS.HealeyP. G. T. (2013a). Music, speech and interaction in an instrumental music lesson: An ethnographic study of one-to-one music tuition. In OrwinM.HowesC.KempsonR. (Eds.), Language, music and interaction (pp. 231–280). London, UK: College Publications.
10.
DuffyS.HealeyP. G. T. (2013b, July–August). Using music as a turn in conversation in a lesson. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2231–2236). Berlin, Germany: Cognitive Science Society.
11.
DuffyS.WilliamsD.StevensT.KegelI.JansenJ.CesarP.HealeyP. G. T. (2012, July). Remote Music Tuition. In Proceedings of the 9th Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 333–338). Copenhagen.
12.
GrockeD.WigramT. (2006). Engaging with clients verbally and musically. In Receptive methods in music therapy: Techniques and clinical applications for music therapy clinicians, educators and students (pp. 20–44). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
13.
HealeyP.LeachJ.Bryan-KinnsN. (2005, April). Inter-play: Understanding group music improvisation as a form of everyday interaction. In Proceedings of Less is More — Simple Computing in an Age of Complexity. Cambridge: Microsoft Research.
14.
HeathC.LuffP.SellenA. (1997). Reconfiguring media space: Supporting collaborative work. In FinnK.SellenA. J.WilburS. B. (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication(pp. 323–347). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
HolckU. (2004). Turn-taking in music therapy with children with communication disorders. British Journal of Music Therapy, 18(2), 45–53.
16.
KendonA. (1990). Spatial organization in social encounters: The F-formation system. In Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters (pp. 209–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
KendonA.CookM. (1969). The consistency of gaze patterns in social interaction. British Journal of Psychology, 60(4), 481–494.
18.
KingE. C. (2006). The roles of student musicians in quartet rehearsals. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 262–282.
19.
SacksH.SchegloffE. A.JeffersonG. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
20.
SchegloffE.JeffersonG.SacksH. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
21.
SchoberM. F. (2006). Virtual environments for creative work in collaborative music-making. Virtual Reality, 10(2), 85–94.
22.
SeddonF.BiasuttiM. (2009). A comparison of modes of communication between members of a string quartet and a jazz sextet. Psychology of Music, 37(4), 395–415.
23.
SellenA. (1995). Remote conversations: The effects of mediating talk with technology. Human-Computer Interaction, 10(4), 401–444.
24.
TurinoT. (2008). Participatory and presentational performance. In Music as social life: The politics of participation (pp. 23–65). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
VinesB. W.WanderleyM. M.KrumhanslC. L.NuzzoR. L.LevitinD. J. (2004). Performance gestures of musicians: What structural and emotional information do they convey? In CamurriA.VolpeG. (Eds.) Gesture-based communication in human-computer interaction (pp. 468–478). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
26.
WanderleyM. M.VinesB. W.MiddletonN.McKayC.HatchW. (2005). The musical significance of clarinetists’ ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97–113.
27.
WeaverW. (1949). Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. The Mathematical Theory of Communication, 1, 1–12.
