This study tested the effects of hand-clapping to the rhythm of newly learned French words on the pronunciation of these words by 7- to 8-year-old Catalan children. In a short training experiment with a pre- and posttest design, 28 children either repeated cognate words in French (e.g. French aspirateur, Catalan aspirador ‘vacuum cleaner’) while clapping to the rhythmic structure of those words or only repeated the words. Participants’ oral productions before and after training were rated for accentedness by three French native speakers. Results showed that in both groups, participants’ pronunciation improved after training, and crucially, children in the clapping group improved significantly more than those in the non-clapping group. Additionally, an acoustic analysis of the duration of word-final vowels indicated that only children in the clapping group significantly lengthened the final vowel after training, thus producing more target-like durational patterns. Our results suggest that a brief embodied intervention based on highlighting the rhythmic structure of words through hand-clapping has the potential to enhance pronunciation in a foreign language. The implications for second language teaching of pronunciation are discussed.
Aliaga-GarciaC.MoraJ.C.Cerviño-PovedanoE. (2011). L2 speech learning in adulthood and phonological short-term memory. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47, 1–14.
2.
Anderson-HsiehJ.JohnsonR.KoehlerK. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555.
3.
ArellanoS.I.DraperJ.E. (1972). Relations between musical aptitudes and second-language learning. Hispania, 55, 111–121.
4.
AstésanoC. (2001). Rythme et accentuation en français: Invariance et variabilité stylistique [Rhythm and accentuation in French: Invariance and stylistic variability]. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
5.
BaillsF.Suárez-GonzálezN.González-FuenteS.PrietoP. (2019). Observing and producing pitch gestures facilitates the learning of Mandarin Chinese tones and words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 33–58.
6.
BarsalouL.W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
7.
BartkovaK.BonneauA.ColotteV.DargnatM. (2012). Production of ‘continuation contours’ by French speakers in L1 (French) and L2 (English). In MaQ.DingH.HirstD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th speech prosody: Volume (pp. 426–429). Shanghai: Tongji University Press.
8.
BehrmanA. (2014). Segmental and prosodic approaches to accent management. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 546–561.
9.
BhideA.PowerA.GoswamiU. (2013). A rhythmic musical intervention for poor readers: A comparison of efficacy with a letter-based intervention. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 113–123.
10.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer: Version 6.0.33 [computer software]. Available at: http://www.praat.org (accessed January 2021).
11.
BorghiA.M.CaruanaF. (2015). Embodiment theory. In WrightJ. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 420–426). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12.
BuntingM.F.M.CowanN.SaultsJ.S.S. (2006). How does running memory span work?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1691–1700.
13.
CameronD.J.GrahnJ.A. (2014). Enhanced timing abilities in percussionists generalize to rhythms without a musical beat. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1003.
14.
CasonN.SchönD. (2012). Rhythmic priming enhances the phonological processing of speech. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2652–2658.
15.
CasonN.AstésanoC.SchönD. (2015a). Bridging music and speech rhythm: Rhythmic priming and audio-motor training affect speech perception. Acta Psychologica, 155, 43–50.
16.
CasonN.HidalgoC.IsoardF.RomanS.SchönD. (2015b). Rhythmic priming enhances speech production abilities: Evidence from prelingually deaf children. Neuropsychology, 29, 102–107.
17.
CohrdesC.GroligL.SchroederS. (2016). Relating language and music skills in young children: A first approach to systemize and compare distinct competencies on different levels. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1616.
18.
CorriveauK.H.GoswamiU. (2009). Rhythmic motor entrainment in children with speech and language impairments: Tapping to the beat. Cortex, 45, 119–130.
19.
DarcyI.EwertD.LidsterR. (2012). Bringing pronunciation instruction back into the classroom: An ESL teachers’ pronunciation ‘toolbox’. In LevisJ.LeVelleK. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 93–108). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
20.
DarcyI.ParkH.YangC.L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 63–72.
21.
de GrootA.M.B.KeijzerR. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50, 1–56.
22.
de JongN.H.WempeT. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 385–390.
23.
Delais-RoussarieE.PostB.AvanziM., et al. (2015). Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French. In FrotaS.PrietoP. (Eds): Intonation in Romance (pp. 63–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
DelattreP. (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4, 183–198.
25.
DeloguF.ZhengY. (2020). Beneficial effects of musicality on the development of productive phonology skills in second language acquisition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 618.
26.
DerwingT.M.RossiterM.J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1–17.
27.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J.WiebeG. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393–410.
28.
Di CristoA.HirstD. (1993). Rythme syllabique, rythme mélodique et représentation hiérarchique de la prosodie du français [Syllabic rhythm, melodic rhythm and hierarchical representation of the prosody of French]. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix, 15, 9–24.
FalkS.Dalla BellaS. (2016). It is better when expected: aligning speech and motor rhythms enhances verbal processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 699–708.
31.
FalkS.LanzilottiC.SchönD. (2017a). Tuning neural phase entrainment to speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 1378–1389.
32.
FalkS.Volpi-MoncorgerC.Dalla BellaS. (2017b). Auditory-motor rhythms and speech processing in French and German listeners. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 395.
33.
FischlerJ. (2009). The rap on stress: Teaching stress patterns to English language learners through rap music. MInneTESOL Journal, 26, 1–23.
34.
FlaugnaccoE.LopezL.TerribiliC., et al. (2015). Music training increases phonological awareness and reading skills in developmental dyslexia: A randomized control trial. PLoS ONE, 10, e0138715.
35.
FlegeJ.E. (1987). The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.
36.
FletcherJ. (1991). Rhythm and final lengthening in French. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 193–212.
37.
FrotaS.PrietoP. (2015). Intonation in Romance: systemic similarities and differences. In FrotaS.PrietoP. (Eds.), Intonation in Romance (pp. 392–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
GendrotC.Adda-DeckerM.SantiagoF. (2019). Acoustic realization of vowels as a function of syllable position: A cross-linguistic study with data from French and Spanish. In GilJ.GibsonM. (Eds.), Romance phonetics and phonology (pp. 77–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
GilleeceL.F. (2006). An empirical investigation of the association between musical aptitude and foreign language aptitude. Doctoral dissertation, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Dublin: Trinity Access to Research Archive. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2262/77993 (accessed January 2021).
40.
GlenbergA.M.KaschakM.P. (2003). The body’s contribution to language. In RossB. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 93–126). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
41.
GluharevaD.PrietoP. (2017). Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Research, 21, 609–631.
42.
Goldin-MeadowS. (2014). Widening the lens: What the manual modality reveals about language, learning and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 1–11.
43.
Goldin-MeadowS.CookS.W.MitchellZ.A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20, 267–272.
44.
GordonJ.DarcyI. (2016). The development of comprehensible speech in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1, 56–92.
45.
GordonJ.DarcyI.EwertD. (2013). Pronunciation teaching and learning: Phonetic instruction in the L2 classroom. In LevisJ.LeVelleK. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 194–206). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
46.
GordonR.L.JacobsM.S.SchueleC.M.McauleyJ.D. (2015a). Perspectives on the rhythm–grammar link and its implications for typical and atypical language development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337, 16–25.
47.
GordonR.L.ShiversC.M.WielandE.A., et al. (2015b). Musical rhythm discrimination explains individual differences in grammar skills in children. Developmental Psychology, 18, 635–644.
48.
GoswamiU. (2011). A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 3–10.
49.
GoswamiU.HussM.MeadN.FoskerT.VerneyJ.P. (2013). Perception of patterns of musical beat distribution in phonological developmental dyslexia: Significant longitudinal relations with word reading and reading comprehension. Cortex, 49, 1363–1376.
50.
GoswamiU.ThomsonJ.RichardsonU., et al. (2002). Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: A new hypothesis. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., 99, 10911–10916.
51.
HabibM.LardyC.DesilesT., et al. (2016). Music and dyslexia: A new musical training method to improve reading and related disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 26.
52.
HalleM.VergnaudJ.-R. (1987). An essay on stress. Phonology, 7, 171–188.
53.
HerreraL.LorenzoO.DefiorS.Fernández-SmithG.Costa-GiomiE. (2011). Effects of phonological and musical training on the reading readiness of native- and foreign-Spanish-speaking children. Psychology of Music, 39, 68–81.
54.
IizukaT.NakatsukasaK.BraverA. (2020). The efficacy of gesture on second language pronunciation: An exploratory study of handclapping as a classroom instructional tool. Language Learning. Epub ahead of print 3 June 2020. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12415.
55.
JohnsonE.K.JusczykP.W. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 548–567.
56.
JonesC. (2009). Interdisciplinary approach: Advantages, disadvantages, and the future benefits of interdisciplinary studies. ESSAI, 7, 26.
57.
JunS.-A.FougeronC. (1995). The accentual phrase and the prosodic structure of French. In EleniusK.BranderudP. (Eds.), Proceedings of 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: Volume 2 (pp. 722–725). Stockholm: KTH & Stockholm University.
58.
JunS.-A.FougeronC. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In BotinisA. (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology (pp. 209–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
59.
JuntunenM.-L. (2016). The Dalcroze approach: Experiencing and knowing music through the embodied exploration. In AbrilC.R.GaultB. (Eds.), Approaches to teaching general music: Methods, issues, and viewpoints (pp. 141–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
KangO.RubinD.PickeringL. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal, 94, 554–566.
61.
KellyS.BaileyA.HirataY. (2017). Metaphoric gestures facilitate perception of intonation more than length in auditory judgments of non-native phonemic contrasts. Collabra: Psychology, 3, 7.
62.
KieferM.TrumppN. M. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1, 15–20.
63.
KotzS.A.GunterT.C. (2015). Can rhythmic auditory cuing remediate language-related deficits in Parkinson’s disease?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337, 62–68.
64.
KushchO. (2018). Beat gestures and prosodic prominence: Impact on learning. Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/463004 (accessed January 2021).
65.
LawL.N.C.ZentnerM. (2012). Assessing musical abilities objectively: Construction and validation of the profile of music perception skills. PLoS ONE, 7, e52508.
66.
LeeJ.JangJ.PlonskyL. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36, 345–366.
LiP.BaillsF.PrietoP. (2020). Observing and producing durational hand gestures facilitates the pronunciation of novel vowel length contrasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Epub ahead of print 6 April 2020. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263120000054.
69.
López-OrnatS.GallegoC.GalloP.KarousouA.MariscalS.MartínezM. (2005). Inventario del desarrollo MacArthur: Versión española. Madrid: TEA.
70.
MacchiL.VansteeneC.TimmermansN.BoidienF. (2013). Épreuve lilloise de discrimination phonologique: Présentation et illustration par deux études de cas cliniques [Lille phonological discrimination test: Presentation and illustration with two clinical case studies]. Les Cahiers de l’ASELF, 10, 3–22.
71.
MacedoniaM. (2019). Embodied learning: Why at School the mind needs the body. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2098.
72.
MacedoniaM.MüllerK.FriedericiA.D. (2011). The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 982–998.
73.
MachačP.SkarnitzlR. (2009). Principles of phonetic segmentation. Prague: Epocha.
74.
MadanC.R.SinghalA. (2012). Using actions to enhance memory: Effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 507.
75.
MagneC.AstésanoC.AramakiM., et al. (2007). Influence of syllabic lengthening on semantic processing in spoken French: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2659–2668.
76.
MasumotoK.YamaguchiM.SutaniK., et al. (2006). Reactivation of physical motor information in the memory of action events. Brain Research, 1101, 102–109.
77.
McCaffertyS.G. (2006). Gesture and the materialization of second language prosody. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 197–209.
78.
MilovanovR.PietiläP.TervaniemiM.EsquefP.A.A. (2010). Foreign language pronunciation skills and musical aptitude: A study of Finnish adults with higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 56–60.
79.
MilovanovR.HuotilainenM.VälimäkiV.EsquefP.A.A.TervaniemiM. (2008). Musical aptitude and second language pronunciation skills in school-aged children: Neural and behavioral evidence. Brain Research, 1194, 81–89.
80.
MorganC. (2004). Musical aptitude and second-language phonetics learning: Implications for teaching methodology. Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada. Summit Institutional Repository. Available at: http://summit.sfu.ca/item/6519 (accessed January 2021).
81.
MorettL.M.ChangL.-Y. (2015). Emphasising sound and meaning: Pitch gestures enhance Mandarin lexical tone acquisition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 347–353.
82.
MorganJ.L.SaffranJ.R. (1995). Emerging integration of sequential and suprasegmental information in preverbal speech segmentation. Child Development, 66, 911–936.
83.
MunroM.DerwingT.MortonS. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 111–131.
84.
NagleC.SachsR.Zárate–SándezG. (2018). Exploring the intersection between teachers’ beliefs and research findings in pronunciation instruction. Modern Language Journal, 102, 512–532.
85.
NardoD.ReitererS.M. (2009). Musicality and phonetic language aptitude. In DogilG.ReitererS. (Eds.), Trends in applied linguistics: Language talent and brain activity (pp. 213–256). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
86.
NelsonS.D. (2016). The effects of an integrated rhythmic and literacy intervention on the development of phonological awareness and rhythm skills of preschoolers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
87.
OveryK. (2003). Dyslexia and music: From timing deficits to musical intervention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 497–505.
88.
PittM.A.SamuelA.G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 564–573.
89.
PrietoP.VanrellM.M.AstrucL.PayneE.PostB. (2012). Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm: Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Communication, 54, 681–702.
90.
PrietoP.Borràs-ComesJ.CabréT., et al. (2015). Intonational phonology of Catalan and its dialectal varieties. In FrotaS.PrietoP. (Eds.), Intonation in Romance (p. 9–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91.
RaoR. (2010). Final lengthening and pause duration in three dialects of Spanish. In Ortega-LlebariaM. (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 69–82). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Available at: http://www.lingref.com/cpp/lasp/4/paper2368.pdf (accessed January 2021).
92.
ReitererS.M.HuX.SumathiT.ASinghN.C. (2013). Are you a good mimic? Neuro-acoustic signatures for speech imitation ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 782.
93.
ReppB.H.SuY.H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 403–452.
94.
Romero NaranjoF.J.R. (2013). Science and art of body percussion: A review. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 8, 442–457.
RotaG.ReitererS. (2009). Cognitive aspects of pronunciation talent. Language talent and brain activity (pp. 67–96). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
97.
RueschemeyerS.A.LindemannO.Van RooijD.Van DamW.BekkeringH. (2010). Effects of intentional motor actions on embodied language processing. Experimental Psychology, 57, 260–266.
98.
SaitoK. (2012). Effects of instruction on L2 pronunciation development: A synthesis of 15 quasi-experimental intervention studies. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 842–854.
99.
SaitoK.TrofimovichP.IsaacsT. (2017). Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38, 439–462.
100.
SantiagoF.P.Mairano. (2019). Prosodic effects on L2 French vowels: a corpus-based investigation. In CalhounS.EscuderoP.TabainM.WarrenP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1084–1088). Melbourne: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.
101.
SchwabS. (2012). Do native Spanish speakers transfer accentual acoustic properties from Spanish to French L2? In MaQ.DingH.D.Hirst (Ed.). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 330–333). Shanghai: Tongji University Press.
102.
SchwabS. (2013). Apprenants hispanophones de FLE et accentuation en Français [Spanish-speaking learners of French as a foreign language and emphasis in French]. Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique, 59, 71–86.
ThomsonR.I.DerwingT.M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A Narrative Review. Applied Linguistics, 36, 326–344.
105.
TierneyA.KrausN. (2013). Music training for the development of reading skills. Progress in Brain Research, 207, 209–241.
106.
VaissièreJ. (1991). Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In SundbergJ.NordL.CarlsonR. (Eds.), Music, language, speech and brain (pp. 108–121). Houndsmill: Macmillan.
107.
ViladotL.CasalsA. (2018). Rhyming the rhythm and measuring the metre: Pooling music and language in the classroom. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 1, 37–43.
108.
WangH.MokP.MengH. (2016). Capitalizing on musical rhythm for prosodic training in computer-aided language learning. Computer Speech and Language, 37, 67–81.
109.
WellsbyM.PexmanP.M. (2014). Developing embodied cognition: Insights from children’s concepts and language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 506.
110.
WhiteE.J.HutkaS.A.WilliamsL.J.MorenoS. (2013). Learning, neural plasticity and sensitive periods: Implications for language acquisition, music training and transfer across the lifespan. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 90.
111.
YuanC.González-FuenteS.BaillsF.PrietoP. (2019). Observing pitch gestures favors the learning of Spanish intonation by Mandarin speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 5–32.
112.
ZellnerB. (1996). Structures temporelles et structures prosodiques en français lu [Temporal structures and prosodic structures in read French]. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 1, 7–23.
113.
ZhangY.BaillsF.PrietoP. (2018). Hand-clapping to the rhythm of newly learned words improves L2 pronunciation: Evidence from training Chinese adolescents with French words. Language Teaching Research, 24, 666–689.
114.
Zion GolumbicE.M.PoeppelD.SchroederC.E. (2012). Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: A behavioral and neural perspective. Brain and Language, 122, 151–161.
115.
ZwaanR.A.TaylorL.J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 135, 1–11.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
