Though research has shown that rhythmic training is beneficial for phonological speech processing, little empirical work has been carried out to assess whether rhythmic training in the classroom can help to improve pronunciation in a second language. This study tests the potential benefits of hand-clapping to the rhythm of newly learned French words for the acquisition of pronunciation patterns by Chinese adolescents. In a between-subjects training experiment with a pretest/posttest design, 50 Chinese adolescents either repeated new French words while clapping out their rhythmic structure (clapping condition) or only repeated the words (non-clapping condition). Participants’ oral production before and after training was (1) perceptually rated for accentedness by two French native speakers and (2) acoustically analysed for final syllable duration. While the results showed an only near-significant improvement from pretest to posttest in accentedness ratings for the clapping group, a significant improvement was obtained for acoustic durational measures. Individual musical abilities did not interact significantly in either of the two analyses, and working memory interacted significantly only with accentedness. These results show that a short training session in which clapping is used to highlight the prosodic structure of words can help improve pronunciation in a foreign language.
Anderson-HsiehJ.JohnsonR.KoehlerK. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555.
2.
AstésanoC. (2001). Rythme et accentuation en français: Invariance et variabilité stylistique [Rhythm and stress in French: Invariance and stylistic variability]. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
3.
BakerA. (2014). Exploring teachers’ knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: Teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 136–163.
4.
BehrmanA. (2014). Segmental and prosodic approaches to accent management. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 546–561.
5.
BessonM.ChobertJ.MarieC. (2011). Transfer of training between music and speech: Common processing, attention, and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 94.
6.
BhideA.PowerA.GoswamiU. (2013). A rhythmic musical intervention for poor readers: A comparison of efficacy with a letter-based intervention. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 113–123.
7.
BianF. (2013). The influence of Chinese stress on English pronunciation teaching and learning. English Language Teaching, 6, 199–211.
8.
BidelmanG.M.GandourJ.T.KrishnanA. (2011). Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 425–434.
9.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2013). Praat: doing phonetics by computer: Version 6.0.28 [computer program]. Available at: http://www.praat.org (accessed September 2018).
CasonN.SchönD. (2012). Rhythmic priming enhances the phonological processing of speech. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2652–2658.
12.
CasonN.AstésanoC.SchönD. (2015). Bridging music and speech rhythm: Rhythmic priming and audio–motor training affect speech perception. Acta Psychologica, 155, 43–50.
13.
CasonN.HidalgoC.IsoardF.RomanS.SchönD. (2015). Rhythmic priming enhances speech production abilities: Evidence from prelingually deaf children. Neuropsychology, 29, 102–107.
14.
ChenC.F.FanC.Y.LinH.P. (1996). A new perspective on teaching English pronunciation: Rhythm. ERIC, ED397638. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED397638 (accessed September 2018).
15.
ChristinerM.ReitererS.M. (2015). A Mozart is not a Pavarotti: Singers outperform instrumentalists on foreign accent imitation. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9, 482.
16.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42, 476–490.
18.
DerwingT.M.RossiterM.J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1–17.
19.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.WiebeG. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393–410.
20.
FischlerJ. (2009). The rap on stress: Teaching stress patterns to English language learners through rap music. MInneTESOL Journal, 26.
21.
GluharevaD.PrietoP. (2017). Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Research, 21, 609–631.
22.
GordonJ.DarcyI.EwertD. (2013). Pronunciation teaching and learning: Phonetic instruction in the L2 classroom. In: LevisJ.LeVelleK. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 194–206). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
23.
HabibM.LardyC.DesilesT., et al. (2016). Music and dyslexia: A new musical training method to improve reading and related disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 26.
24.
HenryL.A.MesserD.Luger-KleinS.CraineL. (2012). Phonological, visual, and semantic coding strategies and children’s short-term memory span. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2033–2053.
25.
LawL.N.ZentnerM. (2012). Assessing musical abilities objectively: Construction and validation of the Profile of Music Perception Skills. PloS One, 7, e52508.
26.
LiS. (2012). 汉语母语者法语语音习得难点分析 [An analysis of the difficulties in the acquisition of French pronunciation by Chinese native speakers]. 剑南文学: 经典教苑 (下) [Jiannan Literature: Classical Pedagogy (Part 2)], 116.
27.
McCaffertyS.G. (2006). Gesture and the materialization of second language prosody. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 197–209.
NardoD.ReitererS. (2009). Musicality and phonetic language aptitude. In DogilG.ReitererS. (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 213–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
30.
PatelA.D. (2010). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Phillips-SilverJ.TrainorL.J. (2005). Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science, 308, 1430–1430.
32.
Romero NaranjoF.J.R.Romero NaranjoA.A.R. (2013). Handclapping songs and gender: An approach using the BAPNE method. Feminismo/s, 21, 205–223.
33.
Roncaglia-DenissenM.P.RoorD.A.ChenA.SadakataM. (2016). The enhanced musical rhythmic perception in second language learners. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.
34.
SmotrovaT. (2017). Making pronunciation visible: Gesture in teaching pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 59–89.
35.
WangH.MokP.MengH. (2016). Capitalizing on musical rhythm for prosodic training in computer-aided language learning. Computer Speech & Language, 37, 67–81.
36.
WilsonR.A.FogliaL. (2017). Embodied cognition. In ZaltaE.N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring 2017 edition. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia Project. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition (accessed September 2018).
