This study examined the effect of feedback, feed up (comments on goals and students’ success in achieving goals) and feed forward (comments on the next step in learning during the semester) on writing motivation, writing self-efficacy, and writing anxiety. Two hundred and ten female intermediate language learners (agemean = 17.2) were assigned to seven experimental conditions: feedback, feed up, feed forward, feedback + feed up, feedback + feed forward, feed up + feed forward, and feedback + feed up + feed forward (n = 30 for each group). Based on group assignment, the participants received feedback, feed up, and feed forward for 12 sessions and took writing motivation, writing self-efficacy, and writing anxiety scales as pretest and posttest. The results of MANOVA and paired samples t-test comparisons indicated that groups that received feedback significantly improved in terms of self-efficacy. In addition, groups who received feed up and feed forward significantly improved in terms of writing motivation. The results also showed that the combination of feedback, feed up and feed forward could decrease learners’ writing anxiety. Based on the findings of the study, it is recommended that teachers present feed up and feed forward along with feedback to improve non-linguistic aspects of L2 writing among their students.
BarghJ.A.GollwitzerP.M.Lee-ChaiA.BarndollarK.TrötschelR. (2001). The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.
2.
BitchenerJ.KnochU. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63, 204–211.
3.
BitchenerJ.KnochU. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207–217.
4.
BusseV. (2013). How do students of German perceive feedback practices at university? A motivational exploration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 406–424.
5.
ChengY.S. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 647–656.
6.
ChengY.S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 313–335.
7.
ClémentR. (1980). Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second language. In GilesH.RobinsonW.P.SmithP.M. (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 147–154). Oxford: Pergamon.
8.
DörnyeiZ. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson.
10.
FerrisD.R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201.
11.
FerrisD.R.RobertsB. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.
12.
FerrisD.R.BrownJ.LiuH.StineM.E.A. (2011). Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 207–234.
13.
FerrisD.R.LiuH.SinhaA.SennaM. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307–329.
14.
GoldsteinL.M. (2005). Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
15.
HanJ.HiverP. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44–59.
16.
HattieJ.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
17.
HayesJ.R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In LevyC.M.RansdellL.S. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
HetthongR.TeoA. (2013). Does writing self-efficacy correlate with and predict writing performance?International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2, 157–167.
19.
HidiS.BoscoloP. (Eds.). (2006). Writing and motivation. Leiden: Brill.
20.
HorwitzE. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126.
21.
HorwitzE.YoungD. (1991). Language anxiety. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22.
HubertyC.J.PetoskeyM.D. (2000). Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. In TinsleyH.BrownS. (Eds.) Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 182–208). New York: Academic Press.
23.
HylandF. (2011). The language learning potential of form-focused feedback on writing: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. In ManchónR. (Ed.), Learning to-write and writing-to learn in an additional language (pp. 159–179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24.
KarimK.NassajiH. (2020). The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing. Language Teaching Research, 24, 519–529.
25.
KormosJ. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 390–403.
26.
Latham-KoenigC.OxendenC.SeligsonP. (2015). American English file. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
LeeM.K.EvansM. (2019). Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 831–847.
28.
LockeE.A.LathamG.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
ManchónR.M. (2009). Individual differences in foreign language learning: The dynamics of beliefs about L2 writing. Revista Espanola de Linguıstica Aplicada, 22, 245–268.
30.
ManchónR.M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In ManchónR.M. (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31.
MatthewsP.H. (2010). Factors influencing self-efficacy judgments of university students in foreign language tutoring. Modern Language Journal, 94, 618–635.
NassajiH. (2016). Anniversary article Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20, 535–562.
34.
NassajiH.EKartchava (Eds.) (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
35.
PaeT.I. (2012). Skill-based L2 anxieties revisited: Their intra-relations and the inter-relations with general foreign language anxiety. Applied Linguistics, 34, 232–252.
36.
PajaresF.ValianteG.CheongY.F. (2007). Writing self-efficacy and its relation to gender, writing motivation and writing competence: A developmental perspective. In HidiS.BoscoloP. (Eds.), Writing and motivation (pp. 141–159). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
37.
PallantJ. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
38.
PapiM.BondarenkoA.V.WawireB.JiangC.ZhouS. (2019). Feedback-seeking behavior in second language writing: Motivational mechanisms. Reading and Writing, 32, 485–505.
39.
PlonskyL.OswaldF.L. (2014). How big is ‘Big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
40.
RueggR. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46, 87–102.
41.
SadlerD.R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.
42.
Sanders-ReioJ.AlexanderP.ReioT.G.NewmanI. (2014). Do students’ beliefs about writing relate to their writing self-efficacy, apprehension, and performance?Learning and Instruction, 33, 1–11.
43.
SchunkD.H.PajaresF. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In WentzelK.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–54). New York: Taylor & Francis.
44.
TaguchiT.MagidM.PapiM. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
45.
WallerL.PapiM. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65.
46.
WinneP.H.ButlerD.L. (1994). Student cognition in learning from teaching. In HusenT.PostlewaiteT. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd edition, pp. 5738–5745). Oxford: Pergamon.
47.
WoodrowL. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39, 510–522.
48.
ZabihiR. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35, 32–57.
49.
ZimmermanB.J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48, 135–147.
