This article arose in response to the recent impetus for embedding inquiry-based approaches in higher education. It draws upon the perceptions of students and faculty members regarding inquiry-based education in Academic English (AE) programmes at universities in Bangladesh within an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. Research-informed teaching (RIT), an intellectually stimulating and inquiry-based learning approach, is the conceptual base of the study. Data were collected from four Bangladeshi universities using a learning experience survey with students (n = 319) and semi-structured interviews with six EFL faculty members. The findings provide four guiding principles on the design and implementation of RIT-based AE programmes: (1) addressing wider educational objectives in AE education, (2) incorporating applied features in the learning activities, (3) building faculty members’ research literacy and practice, and (4) establishing academic collaboration across disciplines. While the findings are derived from Bangladesh higher education, the guiding principles and strategies have resonance internationally.
AhrensmeierD. (2013). A practical application of Physics Education Research-informed teaching interventions in a first-year physics service course. Journal of Technical Education (JOTED), 1, 166–178.
2.
AlamM.HaqueM.S.SiddiqueS.F. (2007). Private higher education in Bangladesh. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
3.
AnwaruddinS.M.PervinN. (2015). English-language teachers’ engagement with research: Findings from Bangladesh. Professional Development in Education, 41, 21–39.
BakH.-J.KimD.H. (2015). Too much emphasis on research? An empirical examination of the relationship between research and teaching in multitasking environments. Research in Higher Education, 56, 843–860.
6.
BallT.WellsG. (2009). Running cars down ramps: Learning about learning over time. Language and Education, 23, 371–390.
7.
BhushanS. (2017). Universities in India: What constitutes new direction?IASSI-Quarterly, 36, 276–289.
8.
BloomeD.CarterS.P.ChristianB.M.OttoS.Shuart-FarisN. (2004). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. New York: Routledge.
9.
BowenH.R.FincherC. (2018). Goals: The intended outcomes of higher education. In BowenH.R. (Ed.), Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education (pp. 31–60). London: Routledge.
BrownR.B. (2006). Doing your dissertation in business and management: The reality of researching and writing. London: Sage.
12.
ChanC.S. (2017). Investigating a research-informed teaching idea: The use of transcripts of authentic workplace talk in the teaching of spoken business English. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 72–89.
13.
ChengA. (2016). EAP at the tertiary level in China: Challenges and possibilities In HylandK.ShawP. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 97–108). London: Routledge.
14.
ChowdhuryM.A.U.AkteruzzamanM. (2015). Teaching the structures of academic writing through peer review: A study on the beginners of English language courses at BRAC University. GSTF Journal on Education, 3, 39–45.
15.
ChowdhuryR.KabirA.H. (2014). Language wars: English education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Multilingual Education, 4, 21.
16.
De ChazalE. (2014). English for academic purposes: Oxford handbooks for language teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
DuganJ.P. (2012). Exploring local to global leadership education assessment. New Directions for Student Services, 140, 89–102.
18.
ErlingE.J.HamidM.O.SeargeantP. (2010). Grassroots attitudes to the positioning of English as a language for international development. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 18: Negotiating transnational space and multilingual encounters, Southampton, UK.
19.
EvansS.GreenC. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 3–17.
20.
FarcasD.BernardesS.F.MatosM. (2017). The research-teaching nexus from the Portuguese academics’ perspective: A qualitative case study in a school of social sciences and humanities. Higher Education, 74, 239–258.
21.
FlowerdewJ.PeacockM. (2001). Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GibbsG. (2015). Fifty-three powerful ideas. London: Staff and Educational Development Association. Available at: https://www.seda.ac.uk/53-powerful-ideas (accessed July 2020).
24.
GriffithsR. (2004). Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 709–726.
25.
HamidM.O.JahanI.IslamM.M. (2013). Medium of instruction policies and language practices, ideologies and institutional divides: Voices of teachers and students in a private university in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14, 144–163.
26.
HealeyM. (2005). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In BarnettR. (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
27.
HealeyM.JenkinsA. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: The Higher Education Academy.
28.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2018). Higher Education Funding Council for England: Catalyst fund. London: HEFCE.
29.
HigginsR.HoggP.RobinsonL. (2017). Research informed teaching experience in diagnostic radiography: The perspectives of academic tutors and clinical placement educators. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 48, 226–232.
30.
HolleyK. (2017). Interdisciplinary curriculum and learning in higher education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
IrvineV.CodeJ.RichardsL. (2013). Realigning higher education for the 21st century learner through multi-access learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 172–185.
32.
IslamM. (2013). English medium instruction in the private universities in Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 126–137.
33.
JachE.A.TrolianT.L. (2019). Defining applied learning and related student outcomes in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 188, 7–11.
JacobW.J.XiongW.YeH. (2015). Professional development programmes at world-class universities. Palgrave Communications, 1, 15002.
36.
JamilM.G. (2018). Technology-enhanced teacher development in rural Bangladesh: A critical realist evaluation of the context. Evaluation and program planning, 69, 1–9.
37.
JenkinsA.HealeyM.ZetterR. (2007). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. York: The Higher Education Academy.
JessopT.El HakimY.GibbsG. (2014). The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: A large-scale study of students’ learning in response to different programme assessment patterns. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 73–88.
40.
JongbloedB.W.ZomerA.H. (2012). Valorisation, knowledge transfer and IP: Creating value from academic knowledge. In TempleP. (Ed.), Universities in the knowledge economy: Higher education organisation and global change (pp. 82–102). Abingdon: Routledge.
41.
Joseph-RichardP.JessopT. (2018). A phenomenographic study of research informed teaching through the eyes of Masters’ students. Studies in Higher Education, 45, 847–861.
42.
KeefeK.ShiL. (2017). An EAP program and students’ success at a Canadian University. TESL Canada Journal, 34, 1–24.
43.
KhanR.ChaudhuryT.A. (2012). The Bangladeshi employment sector: Employer perspectives concerning English proficiency. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 116–129.
44.
LeisyteL.EndersJ.De BoerH. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher Education, 58, 619–635.
45.
LimS.M.FooY.L.LohH.T.DengX. (2020). Applied learning in higher education: Perspective, pedagogy, and practice. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science.
46.
LubbeI. (2015). Educating professionals: Perceptions of the research–teaching nexus in accounting (a case study). Studies in Higher Education, 40, 1085–1106.
47.
ManaloE.SheppardC. (2016). How might language affect critical thinking performance?Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 41–49.
48.
MartinM. (2018). Trends in good practice from Higher Education Review 2013–16. Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Available at: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk//31608 (accessed July 2020).
49.
MittelmanJ.H. (2017). Implausible dream: The world-class university and repurposing higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
NewtonJ.M.FerrisD.R.GohC.C., et al. (2018). Teaching English to second language learners in academic contexts: Reading, writing, listening, and speaking. London: Routledge.
51.
NicholsonA. (2017). Informed teaching: A clinical approach. The Law Teacher, 51, 40–55.
52.
NudzorH.P. (2009). A critical commentary on combined methods approach to researching educational and social issues. Issues in Educational Research, 19, 114–127.
53.
PanW.CottonD.MurrayP. (2014). Linking research and teaching: Context, conflict and complementarity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51, 3–14.
54.
PanW.MurrayP.CottonD.GarmstonH. (2012). Integrating research-informed teaching into sustainable construction education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7, 94–117.
55.
PattonM.Q. (2005). Qualitative research. In EverittB.S.HowellD. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science: Volume 2 (pp. 1633–1635). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
56.
PonnuswamiI.HarrisN. (2017). Teaching research methods to social work students in India and Australia: Reflections and recommendations. Social Work Education, 36, 690–701.
57.
RahmanM. (2009). Improving the relevance of humanities higher education in Bangladesh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
58.
RahmanM.HamzahM.I.M.MeerahT.RahmanM. (2010). Historical development of secondary education in Bangladesh: Colonial period to 21st century. International Education Studies, 3, 114–125.
59.
RahmanS. (2005). Orientations and motivation in English language learning: A study of Bangladeshi students at undergraduate level. Asian EFL Journal, 7, 29–55.
60.
RahmanT.NakataS.NagashimaY., et al. (2019). Bangladesh tertiary education sector review: Skills and innovation for growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank
61.
RaqibA.A. (2019). Innovations in teacher training at higher education in Bangladesh. Social Science Review [The Dhaka University Studies, Part-D], 36, 221–231. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3453063 (accessed July 2020).
62.
RogersC.R.FreibergH.J. (1994). Freedom to learn. New York: Merrill.
63.
RoshidM.M.WebbS.C. (2013). From workplace learning to work integrated learning for English communication skills: Professional development in the international business sector. In GreenwoodJ.EverattJ.KabirA.H.AlamS. (Eds), Research and educational change in Bangladesh (pp. 115–134). Dhaka: University of Dhaka.
64.
ShailaM.Y.TrudellB. (2010). From passive learners to critical thinkers: Preparing EFL students for university success. English Teaching Forum, 48, 2–9.
65.
ShavaG.N. (2016). Enhancing learner achievement through professional development: The Zimbabwean experience. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30, 56–72.
66.
ShulmanL.S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134, 52–59.
67.
SimkovicM. (2017). A value-added perspective on higher education. UC Irvine Law Review, 7, 123.
68.
SmithE.SmithA. (2012). Buying-out teaching for research: The views of academics and their managers. Higher Education, 63, 455–472.
69.
SternN. (2016). Building on success and learning from experience: An independent review of the Research Excellence Framework. IND/16/9. London: Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
70.
SultanaS. (2014). English as a medium of instruction in Bangladesh’s higher education: Empowering or disadvantaging students?Asian EFL Journal, 16, 11–52.
71.
TaylorJ. (2007). The teaching: Research nexus: A model for institutional management. Higher Education, 54, 867–884.
72.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. London: Sage.
73.
TomlinsonM. (2018). Conceptions of the value of higher education in a measured market. Higher Education, 75, 711–727.
74.
TongV.C.StandenA.SotiriouM. (Eds.). (2018). Shaping higher education with students: Ways to connect research and teaching. London: UCL Press.
75.
TurnsJ.AdamsR.LinseA.MartinJ.AtmanC.J. (2004). Bridging from research to teaching in undergraduate engineering design education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20, 379–390.
VygotskyL. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23, 34–41.
78.
WalkerJ.AlmondP. (2010). Interpreting statistical findings: a guide for health professionals and students. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
79.
WellerS. (2016). Academic practice: Developing as a professional in higher education. London: Sage.
80.
Zappa-HollmanS.DuffP. (2017). Conducting research on content-based language instruction. In SnowM.A.BrintonD.M. (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 309–321). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
81.
ZhuL.PanW. (2017). Application of research-informed teaching in the taught-postgraduate education of maritime law. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54, 428–437.
