Although writing plays a significant role in communication, 21st century literacies and academic foreign language learning, little research has investigated approaches to and instructional practices of writing in foreign language (FL) contexts. To address this gap, the current study explores how postsecondary FL teachers conceptualize writing instruction and apply their conceptual knowledge in the classroom. Using a sociocultural theory perspective, this qualitative study focuses on genre-based writing instruction and the teaching of textual borrowing among three graduate teaching assistants in a lower-level French as a FL course. Findings, based on analysis of classroom observations, teaching materials, and interviews, demonstrate that participants’ conceptualizations and implementation of textual borrowing were emergent, variable, and influenced by their everyday understandings and experiences of writing. These findings suggest several implications for FL writing instruction and teacher professional development and lay the groundwork for future investigations into how writing pedagogy is implemented in postsecondary FL programs.
ACTFL Decades Project. (2011). A decade of foreign language standards: Influence, impact, and future directions: Survey results. Alexandria, VA: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages Task Force on Decade of Standards Project. Available at: https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/publications/standards/StandardsImpactSurvey.pdf (accessed February 2020).
2.
AllenH.W. (2014). Foreign language teaching assistant professional development: Challenges and strategies in meeting the 2007 MLA Report’s calls for change. In SwaffarJ.UrlaubP. (Eds.), Transforming postsecondary foreign language teaching in the United States. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 177–191.
3.
AllenH.W.DupuyB. (2013). Evolving notions of literacy-based foreign language teaching: A case study of graduate student instructors. In AllenH.W.MaximH.H. (Eds.), Educating the future foreign language professoriate for the 21st century. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage, pp. 171–191.
4.
AllenH.W.GoodspeedL. (2018). Textual borrowing and perspective-taking: A genre-based approach to L2 writing. L2 Journal, 10, 87–110.
5.
AllenH.W.PaesaniK. (2017). ‘Invitation au voyage’: A multiliteracies approach to teaching genre. In KruegerC. (Ed.), Approaches to Teaching Baudelaire’s Prose Poems. New York: Modern Language Association, pp. 139–149.
6.
AriewR.DupuyB. (2011). Français-monde: Connectez-vous à la francophonie [French world: Connect with the francophone world]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7.
BorgS. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
8.
ByrnesH.CraneC.MaximH.H.SprangK.A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum instruction. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–110.
9.
ByrnesH.MaximH.H.NorrisJ.M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment [monograph]. Modern Language Journal, 94, 1–221.
10.
CraneC. (2016). Understanding and evaluating L2 personal letter writing: A systemic functional linguistics analysis of student texts in German. Die Unterrichtspraxis [Teaching German], 49, 122–139.
11.
DupuyB.AllenH.W. (2012). Appropriating conceptual and pedagogical tools of literacy: A qualitative study of two novice foreign language teaching assistants. In GorsuchG. (Ed.), Working theories for teaching assistant and international teaching assistant development. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press, pp. 275–315.
12.
FerrisD.R.HedgcockJ.S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice. New York: Routledge.
13.
GebhardM.ChenI.-A.GrahamH.GunawanW. (2013). Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 107–124.
14.
GoodspeedL. (2018). In others’ words: Learner practices and perspectives of textual borrowing in the foreign language classroom. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
15.
GrossmanP.L.SmagorinskyP.ValenciaS. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108, 1–29.
16.
HedgcockJ.S.LeeH. (2017). An exploratory study of academic literacy socialization: Building genre awareness in a teacher education program. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 17–28.
17.
HirvelaA. (2016). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction. 2nd edition. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
18.
HirvelaA.BelcherD. (2007). Writing scholars as teacher educators: Exploring writing teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 125–128.
19.
HolquistM. (1981). The politics of representation. In GreenblattS.J. (Ed.), Allegory and representation. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 163–183.
20.
HubertM.D. (2014). Evaluating the role of writing in the first and second year university foreign language curriculum. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2, 76–86.
21.
HubertM.D.BonzoJ.D. (2010). Does second language writing research impact U.S. university foreign language instruction?System, 38, 517–528.
22.
HylandK. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17–29.
23.
HylandK. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
24.
JohnsonK.E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
25.
JohnsonK.E.ArshavskayaE. (2011). Reconceptualizing the micro-teaching simulation in an MA TESL course. In JohnsonK.E.GolombekP.R. (Eds.), Research on second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on professional development. New York: Routledge, pp. 168–186.
26.
JohnsonK.E.GolombekP.R. (2016). Mindful L2 teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on cultivating teachers’ professional development. New York: Routledge.
27.
JohnsonK.E.GolombekP.R. (2020) Informing and transforming language teacher education pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 24, 116–127.
28.
KalantzisM.CopeB.ChanE.Dalley-TrimL. (2016). Literacies. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KernR. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
LantolfJ.P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
LantolfJ.P.PoehnerM.E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York: Routledge.
32.
LefkowitzN. (2011). The quest for grammatical accuracy: Writing instruction among foreign and heritage language educators. In CimaskoT.ReicheltM. (Eds.), Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices. Anderson: Parlor Press, pp. 225–254.
33.
MartinJ.R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21.
34.
MaximH.H. (2005). Articulating foreign language writing development at the collegiate level: A curriculum-based approach. In BarretteC.M.PaesaniK. (Eds.), Language program articulation: Developing a theoretical foundation. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle, pp. 78–93.
35.
MaximH.H. (2009). ‘It’s made to match’: Linking L2 reading and writing through textual borrowing. In BrantmeierC. (Ed.), Crossing languages and research methods: Analyses of adult foreign language reading. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, pp. 97–122.
36.
MenkeM.R. (2018). Literacy-based curricula in university foreign language instruction: Perceptions from non-tenure-track faculty. L2 Journal, 10, 111–133.
37.
MilesM.B.HubermanA.M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
MillsN.MoultonS.T. (2017). Students’ and instructors’ perceived value of language and content curricular goals. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 717–733.
National Standards Collaborative Board. (2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages. 4th edition. Alexandria, VA: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
41.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
42.
O’DonnellM.E. (2007). Policies and practices in foreign language writing at the college level: Survey results and implications. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 650–671.
43.
PaesaniK.AllenH.W.DupuyB. (2016). A multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
PetrićB. (2012). Legitimate textual borrowing: Direct quotation in L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 102–117.
46.
PfeifferP.C.ByrnesH. (2009). Curriculum, learning, and the identity of majors. In NorrisJ.M.DavisJ.McESinicropeC.WatanabeY.WatanabeY. (Eds.), Toward useful program evaluation in college foreign language education. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, pp. 183–201.
47.
RankinJ.BeckerF. (2006). Does reading the research make a difference? A case study of teacher growth in FL German. Modern Language Journal, 90, 353–372.
48.
ReicheltM. (2011). Foreign language writing: An overview. In CimaskoT.ReicheltM. (Eds.), Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press, pp. 3–21.
49.
ReicheltM.LefkowitzN.RinnertC.SchultzJ.M. (2012). Key issues in foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 22–41.
50.
RotheryJ. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In HasanR.WilliamsG. (Eds.), Literacy in society. London: Longman, pp. 86–123.
51.
SchultzJ.M. (2011). Foreign language writing in the era of globalization. In CimaskoT.ReicheltM. (Eds.), Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press, pp. 65–82.
52.
SwainM.KinnearP.SteinmanL. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
53.
VyatkinaN. (2011). Writing instruction and policies for written corrective feedback in the basic language sequence. L2 Journal, 3, 63–92.
54.
VygotskyL. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
55.
WarrenM.WinklerC. (2016). Developing multiliteracies through genre in the beginner German classroom. In KumagaiY.López-SánchezA.WuS. (Eds.), Multiliteracies in world language education. New York: Routledge, pp. 29–57.
56.
WetteR. (2017). Source text use by undergraduate post-novice L2 writers in disciplinary assignments: Progress and ongoing challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 46–58.
57.
WordenD. (2015). Developing writing concepts for teaching purposes: Preservice L2 writing teachers’ developing conceptual understanding of parallelism. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 19–30.
