The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine principals’ perspectives on a model of professional development (PD) in writing. Participants were 14 principals and seven assistants from a rural district’s K to 12 school system who shared in an interview their challenges and advice for effective PD at a building and district level. Their comments demonstrate the continuous challenges with scale-up efforts and the need for systematic implementation of literacy initiatives. Principals were positive on the PD model and shared guidelines for other leaders’ future implementation of PD on writing. Future research and implications are further discussed.
BallD. L.CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as a learning profession: Handbook for policy and practice (pp. 3–31). Jossey-Bass.
2.
BredesonP.JohanssonO. (2000). The school principal’s role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200114
3.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques to developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE.
4.
DesimoneL. M.GaretM. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263.
5.
DuFourR.BerkeyT. (1995). The principal as staff developer. Journal of Staff Development, 16(4), 2–6.
6.
FlowerL. S.HayesJ. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In GreggL.SteinbergE. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.ChambersA. B. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction: A review of reviews. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 211–226). Guilford Press.
8.
GuskeyT. R. (1997). Research needs to link professional development and student learning. Journal of Staff Development, 18(2), 36–40.
GuskeyT. R.HubermanM. (Eds.). (1995). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices. Teachers College Press.
11.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2009). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 6, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1348/978185409X422542
12.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.AdkinsM. (2015). Practice-based professional development and self-regulated strategy development for Tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40(1), 5–16.
13.
HarrisK. R.LaneK. L.DriscollS.GrahamS.WilsonK.SandmelK.BrindleM.SchatschneiderC. (2012). Tier 1, teacher-implemented self-regulated strategy development for students with and without behavioral challenges. Elementary School Journal, 113, 160–191.
14.
HarrisK. R.LaneK. L.GrahamS.DriscollS.SandmelK.BrindleM.SchatschneiderC. (2012). Practice-based professional development for self-regulated strategies development in writing: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 103–119.
15.
MacArthurC. A. (2011). Strategies instruction. In HarrisK. R.GrahamS.UrdanT. (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook: Applications of educational psychology to learning and teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 379–401). American Psychological Association.
16.
MarzanoR.WatersT.McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: For research to results. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17.
McGheeM. W.LewC. (2007). Leadership and writing: How principals’ knowledge, beliefs, and interventions affect writing instruction in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 358–380.
18.
McKeownD.BrindleM.HarrisK.GrahamS.CollinsA.BrownM. (2016). Illuminating growth and struggles using mixed methods: Practice-based professional development and coaching for differentiating SRSD instruction in writing. Reading and Writing, 29(6), 1105–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9627-y
19.
McKeownD.FitzpatrickE.BrownM.BrindleM.OwensJ.HendrickR. (2019). Urban teachers’ implementation of SRSD for persuasive writing following practice-based professional development: Positive effects mediated by compromised fidelity. Reading and Writing, 32, 1483–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9864-3
20.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C.
21.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.HornerR. H.ThompsonB.HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidencebased practices. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 137–148.
22.
PhilippakosZ. A. (2018). Using a task analysis process for reading and writing assignments. Reading Teacher, 72(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1690
23.
PhilippakosZ. A.MooreN. (2017). The literacy coach’s role in supporting teachers’ implementation of the common core state standards in writing. In LawrenceS. (Ed.), Literacy program evaluation and development initiatives for P-12 teaching (pp. 114–137). IGI-Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0669-0.ch007
24.
PhilippakosZ. A.MacArthurC. A.CokerD. L. (2015). Developing strategic writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades 3-5. Guilford Press.
25.
PhilippakosZ. A.MacArthurC. A. (2020). Developing strategic, young writers through genre instruction: Resources for grades K-2. Guilford Press.
26.
TallericoM. (2014). District issues: Administrators at all levels involved in teachers’ professional development. In MartinL. E.KraglerS.QuatrocheD. J.BausermanK. L. (Eds.), Handbook of professional development in education (pp. 125–144). Guilford Press.
27.
Traga PhilippakosZ. A. (2020a). A yearlong, professional development model on genre-based strategy instruction on writing. The Journal of Educational Research. Online First, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1767531
28.
Traga PhilippakosZ. A. (2020b). Developing strategic learners: Supporting self-efficacy through goal setting and reflection. The Language and Literacy Spectrum. 30(1), 1–24.
29.
Traga PhilippakosZ. A.MacArthurC. A. (in press). Examination of genre-based strategy instruction in middle school English language arts and science. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2021.1894082
30.
Traga PhilippakosZ. A.MacArthurC. A. (2020). Integrating collaborative reasoning and strategy instruction to improve second graders’ opinion writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1650315
31.
Traga PhilippakosZ. A.VoggtA. (Online first, in press). The effects of a virtual professional development model on teachers’ instruction and the quality of second graders’ procedural writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10120-1
32.
TaylorB. M.PressleyM.PearsonP. D. (2002). Research-supported characteristics of teachers and schools that promote reading achievement. In TaylorB. M.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Teaching reading: Effective schools, accomplished teachers (pp. 361–374). Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
TroiaG. A.GrahamS. (2016). Common core writing and language standards and aligned state assessments: A national survey of teacher beliefs and attitudes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(9), 1719–1743.
34.
WagnerT.KeganR.LaheyL.LemonsR. W.GarnierJ.HelsingD.HowellA.Thurber RasmussenH. (2006). Change leadership: A practical guide to transforming our schools. Jossey-Bass.
WestM.AinscowM.StanfordJ. (2005). Sustaining improvement in schools in challenging circumstances: A study of successful practice. School Leadership and Management, 25(1), 77–93.
