This article examines how the concept of a knowledge-base in language teacher education has changed since the 1998 proposal. Arguing that a knowledge-base evolves in two ways: through changes in the field of knowledge, and through changes driven by the work that knowledge supports, I describe two problems: ‘translating’ theory into practice and the ‘positionality’ of those defining what counts as knowledge. The 1998 proposal outlined a work-driven framework in response to the former without fully acknowledging the latter: who is doing English language teaching, with whom, and to what ends. Revising the knowledge-base now depends on taking that positionality into account. With this in mind, I suggest three concepts – of teacher language use (English-for-Teaching), participation and agency, and professional confidence as a measure of outcome – as work-driven alternatives to our present thinking.
BarkhuizenG. (Ed.). (2017). Reflections of language teacher identity research. New York: Routledge.
2.
CanagarajahS. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
ClarkeM. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 9–26.
4.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
5.
EneverJ. (Ed.). (2011). Early language learning in Europe. London: British Council.
6.
FreemanD. (1996). Redefining the relationship between research and what teachers know. In K. BaileyK.NunanD. (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 88–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
FreemanD. (2016). Educating second language teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
FreemanD. (2017). The case for teachers’ classroom English proficiency. Regional English Language Journal (Singapore), 48, 1–12.
9.
FreemanD.LeDreanL. (Eds.). (2017). Developing classroom English competence: The Vietnam experience. Language Teaching in Asia Monograph. International Development Programme (Australia).
10.
FreemanD.KatzA.Garcia GomezP.BurnsA. (2015). English-for-teaching: Rethinking teacher language proficiency for the classroom. English Language Teaching Journal, 69, 129–139.
11.
FreemanD.WebreA.-C.EppersonM. (forthcoming). What counts as knowledge in English language teaching? In WalshS.MannS. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on English Language Teacher Education. London: Routledge.
12.
GarciaO.WeiL. (2014) Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
GravesK. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Language Teaching, 41, 147–181.
14.
GravesK.GartonS. (2017) An analysis of three curriculum approaches to teaching English in public-sector schools. Language Teaching, 50, 441–482.
15.
Hayes-RothF.WatermanD.LenatD. (1983). Building expert systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
HollidayA. (1994). The house of TESEP and the communicative approach: The special needs of the state of English language education. English Language Teaching Journal, 48, 3–11.
17.
HollidayA. (2006). Native-speakerism. English Language Teaching Journal, 60, 385–387.
18.
JacksonP. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
KachruB. (1982). The other tongue: English across cultures. Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
20.
KachruB. (1990). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native Englishes. Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
21.
KubotaR.LinA. (2006). Race and TESOL: Introduction to concepts and theories. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 471–494.
22.
Larsen-FreemanD. (1990). On the need for a theory of language teaching. In AlatisJ. (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1990 (pp. 261–270). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
23.
LeeJ.MurphyJ.BakerA. (2015). Teachers are not empty vessels: A reception study of Freeman and Johnson’s (1998) reconceptualization of the knowledge base of second language teacher education. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 33, 1–23.
24.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
LukeA. (2009). Race and language as capital in school: A sociological template for language-education reform. In KubotaR.LinA. (Eds.), Race, culture, and identities in second language education: Exploring critically engaged practice (pp. 286–308). London: Routledge.
26.
MoussuL.LlurdaE. (2008). Non-native English-speaking English language teachers: History and research. Language Teaching, 41, 315–348.
27.
PrabhuN.S. (1990). There is no best method: Why?TESOL Quarterly, 24, 161–17.
28.
RichardsJ.C. (1987). The dilemma of teacher education in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 209–226.
29.
WiddowsonH.G. (1990). Discourses of inquiry and conditions of relevance. In AlatisJ., (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1990 (pp. 37–48). Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
30.
YepG. (2007). Pedagogy of the opaque: The subject of whiteness in communications and diversity courses. In CooksL.SimpsonJ. (Eds.), Whiteness, pedagogy, performance: Dis/placing race (pp. 87–110). New York: Lexington Books.
31.
YoungJ.W.FreemanD.HauckM.Garcia GomezP.PapageorgiouS. (2014). A Design Framework for the ELTeach Program Assessments. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
