L2 motivational self system (L2MSS) has offered novel pathways for motivating language learners by introducing the concepts of possible selves, vision and imagery. The aim of the study was to examine the effectiveness of a vision-based motivational intervention program in improving motivational attributes of Iranian learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). A total of 51 male and female adult Iranian EFL learners formed the experimental and control groups. The experimental groups received the treatment during an academic semester. The intervention consisted of six steps and included various tasks and activities to improve the students’ vision and imagination. A Likert scale self-report questionnaire was administered before and after the intervention. Marginal qualitative data was also collected for a more in-depth analysis of the results. The results of ANCOVAs alongside the qualitative analysis demonstrated that the vision-based intervention was greatly effective in enhancing second language (L2) learners’ vision and motivation. The participants’ ideal L2 self, attitude toward L2 learning, imagery capacity and intended effort improved, while their ought-to L2 self remained unchanged. The outcomes suggest that it is possible to conduct vision-based interventions that contribute to improving L2 learners’ future self-guides and motivation. Finally, the relevant pedagogical implications are discussed.
AjzenI. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
2.
Al-ShehriA.S. (2009). Motivation and vision: The relation between the ideal L2 self, imagination and visual style. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 164–171). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
3.
ArnoldJ.PuchtaH.RinvolucriM. (2007). Imagine that! Mental imagery in the EFL classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AzarnooshM.BirjandiP. (2012). Junior high school students’ L2 motivational self system: Any gender differences?World Applied Sciences Journal, 20, 577–584.
5.
BoyatzisR.E.AkrivouK. (2006). The ideal self as the driver of intentional change. Journal of Management Development, 25, 624–642.
6.
ChanL. (2014). Effects of an imagery training strategy on Chinese university students’ possible second language selves and learning experiences. In CsizérK.MagidM. (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 357–376). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
7.
CsizérK.KormosJ. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98–119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
8.
DörnyeiZ. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
DörnyeiZ. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
DörnyeiZ. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
12.
DörnyeiZ. (2014). Motivation in second language learning. In Celce-MurciaM.BrintonD.M.SnowM.A. (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th edition, pp. 518–531). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning / Cengage Learning.
13.
DörnyeiZ.ChanL. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory style, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63, 437–462.
14.
DörnyeiZ.KubanyiovaM. (2014). Motivating learners, motivating teachers: Building vision in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DörnyeiZ.RyanS. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.
16.
DörnyeiZ.CsizérK.NémethN. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes, and globalization: A Hungarian perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
17.
DörnyeiZ.HenryA.MuirC. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused interventions. New York: Taylor and Francis.
18.
DörnyeiZ.MuirC.IbrahimZ. (2014). Directed motivational currents: Energizing language learning through creating intense motivational pathways. In LasagabasterD.DoizA.SierraJ.M. (Eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice (pp. 9–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19.
DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. 2nd edition.Harlow: Longman.
20.
FukadaY.FukudaT.FaloutJ.MurpheyT. (2011). Increasing motivation with possible selves. In StewartA. (Ed.), JALT2010 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
21.
GardnerR.C.LambertW.E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266–272.
22.
GriffithsC. (Ed.) (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HallE.HallC.LeechA. (1990). Scripted fantasy in the classroom. London: Routledge.
25.
HenryA.DavydenkoS.DörnyeiZ. (2015). The anatomy of directed motivational currents: Exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. Modern Language Journal, 99, 329–345.
26.
HesselG. (2015). From vision to action: Inquiring into the conditions for the motivational capacity of ideal second language selves. System, 52, 103–114.
27.
HigginsT.E. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
28.
IrieK. (2003). What do we know about the language learning motivation of university students in Japan? Some patterns in survey studies. JALT Journal, 25, 86–100.
29.
KimT.Y. (2009). Korean elementary school students’ perceptual learning style, ideal L2 self, and motivated behavior. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 9, 461–486.
30.
KimY.K.KimT.Y. (2011). The effect of Korean secondary school students’ perceptual learning styles and ideal L2 self on motivated L2 behavior and English proficiency. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11, 21–42.
31.
KlingerE. (2009). Daydreaming and fantasizing: Thought flow and motivation. In MarkmanK.D.KleinW.M.PSuhrJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 225–239). New York: Psychology Press.
32.
KormosJ.KiddleT. (2013). The role of socio-economic factors in motivation to learn English as a foreign language: The case of Chile. System, 41, 399–412.
33.
LambM. (2012). A self system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62, 997–1023.
34.
LiQ. (2014). Differences in the motivation of Chinese learners of English in a foreign and second language context. System, 42, 451–461.
35.
MackayJ. (2014). Applications and implications of the L2 motivational self system in a Catalan EFL context. In CsizérK.MagidM. (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 377–400). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
36.
MagidM. (2014). A motivational program for learners of English: An application of the L2 motivational self system. In CsizérK.MagidM. (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 333–356). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
37.
MagidM.ChanL. (2012). Motivating English learners by helping them visualize their ideal L2 self: Lessons from two motivational programs. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 113–125.
38.
MarkusH.R. (2006). Foreword. In DunkelC.KerpelmanJ. (Eds.), Possible selves: Theory, research and applications (pp. xi–xiv). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
39.
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
40.
McClellandN. (2000). Goal orientations in Japanese college students learning EFL. In CornwellS.RobinsonP. (Eds.), Individual differences in foreign language learning: Effects of aptitude, intelligence, and motivation (pp. 99–115). Tokyo: Aoyama Gakuin University.
41.
MoskovskyC.AssulaimaniT.RachevaS.HarkinsJ. (2016). The L2 motivational self system and L2 achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. Modern Language Journal, 100, 1–14.
42.
MuirC.DörnyeiZ. (2013). Directed motivational currents: Using vision to create effective motivational pathways. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 357–375.
43.
MunezaneY. (2015). Enhancing willingness to communicate: Relative effects of visualization and goal setting. Modern Language Journal, 99, 175–191.
44.
MurphyT.FaloutJ.FukudaT.FukadaY. (2014). Socio-dynamic motivating through idealizing classmates. System, 45, 242–253.
45.
OysermanD.BybeeD.TerryK. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 188–204.
46.
PapiM. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38, 467–479.
47.
PapiM.BondarenkoA.V.MansouriS.FengL.JiangC. (2018). Rethinking L2 motivation research: The 2 × 2 model of L2 self-guides. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Electronic publication ahead of print version. Published online: 20 July 2018 (doi: 10.1017/S0272263118000153).
48.
RuvoloA.P.MarkusH.R. (1992). Possible selves and performance: The power of self-relevant imagery. Social Cognition, 10, 95–124.
49.
SampsonR. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self perceptual change. Language Teaching Research, 16, 317–335.
50.
TaguchiT.MagidM.PapiM. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In DörnyeiZ.UshiodaE. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
51.
TeimouriY. (2017). L2 selves, emotions, and motivated behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 691–709.
52.
UshiodaE. (2008). Motivation and good language learners. In GriffithsC. (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 19–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WeinbergR. (2008). Does imagery work: Effects on performance and mental skills. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 3, 1–21.
54.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
YashimaT. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86, 54–66.
56.
YouC.J.ChanL. (2015). The dynamics of L2 imagery in future motivational self-guides. In DörnyeiZ.MacIntyreP.D.HenryA. (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 397–418). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
57.
YouC.J.DörnyeiZ. (2016). Language learning motivation in China: Results of a large-scale stratified survey. Applied Linguistics, 37, 495–516.
58.
YouC.DörnyeiZ.CsizérK. (2016). Motivation, vision, and gender: A survey of learners of English in China. Language Learning, 66, 94–123.
