This article brings together an experimental study involving L2 knowledge of negation in English and an analysis of how English language textbooks treat negation, in order to consider whether textbook explanations of negation could better exploit linguistic insights into negation. We focus on the English negative polarity item any, whose distribution is contingent on negation, whether through the explicit negator not or through lexical semantic negators (e.g. hardly). Our experiment compares Chinese-speaking learners with existing data from Arabic-speaking learners, finding lower accuracy on any with lexical semantic negators in both groups. Our textbook analysis reveals an approach to negation that is limited to form, focusing on the explicit negator not without explicit treatment of other types of negation. We propose that emphasizing the meaning of negation, with explicit treatment of the full range of negative forms could facilitate more complete acquisition across a range of grammatical properties where negation plays a role.
AdgerD. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
Bardovi-HarligK.StringerD. (2017). Unconventional expressions: Productive syntax in the L2 acquisition of formulaic language. Second Language Research, 33, 61–90.
3.
BellugiU. (1967). The acquisition of negation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Harvard University, New Jersey, USA.
4.
BowlesM.A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–271.
5.
CancinoH.RosanskyE.J.SchumannJ. (1978). The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In HatchE.M. (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 207–230). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
6.
CarnieA. (2013). Syntax: A generative introduction. 3rd edition.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
ChengL.L.S.GiannakidouA. (2013). The non-uniformity of wh-indeterminates with free choice and polarity in Chinese. In GilK.-H.HarlowS.TsoulasG. (Eds), Strategies of quantification (pp. 123–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
ChomskyN. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
9.
DahlÖ. (1979). Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics, 17, 79–106.
10.
EllisN.C. (1996). 1996: Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.
11.
EllisN.C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44.
12.
EllisR. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.
13.
GiannakidouA. (1998). Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam / Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
14.
GiannakidouA. (2001). The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 659–735.
15.
GilK.H.MarsdenH. (2013). Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: A feature reassembly account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 117–149.
16.
HanY.EllisR. (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2, 1–23.
17.
HornL. (2011). Introduction. In HornL. (Ed.), The expression of negation (pp.1–7). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
18.
HyamsN. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
LoewenS. (2009). Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In EllisR.LoewenS.ElderC.ErlamR.PhilpJ.ReindersH. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching (pp. 94–112). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
26.
MackeyA.GooJ. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In MackeyA. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
MarsdenH.WhongM.GilK.H. (2017). What’s in the textbook and what’s in the mind: polarity item ‘any’ in learner English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Electronic publication ahead of print version. Published online: 9 May 2017 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000018).
28.
NorrisJ.M.OrtegaL. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
29.
NorrisJ.M.OrtegaL. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51, 157–213.
30.
SoraceA. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In RitchieW.C.BhatiT.K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375–409). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31.
SpadaN.TomitaY. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
32.
SzabolcsiA. (2004). Positive polarity – negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 409–452.
33.
TsimpliI.M.DimitrakopoulouM. (2007). The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23, 215–242.
34.
TubauS. (2008). Negative concord in English and Romance: Syntax–morphology interface conditions on the expression of negation. Utrecht: LOT.
35.
Van HeuvenW.J.B.ManderaP.KeuleersE.BrysbaertM. (2014). Subtlex–UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190.
36.
von FintelK. (1999). NPI-licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics, 16, 97–148.
37.
WangY. F. F. (1993). The Chinese NPI renhe in contexts with negative values. In Proceedings of PACFoCoL I (1993): Pacific Asia conference on formal and computational linguistics (pp. 265–281). The Computational Linguistics Society of ROC Taipei, Taiwan.
38.
WangY.-F.F.HsiehM.-L. (1996). A syntactic study of the Chinese negative polarity item renhe. Cahiers de Linguistique: Asie Orientale, 25, 35–62.
39.
WhongM.GilK.-H.MarsdenH. (2013). Universal Grammar and the second language classroom. Dordrecht: Springer.
40.
WhongM.GilK.-H.MarsdenH. (2014). Beyond Paradigm: The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of classroom research. Second Language Research, 30, 551–568.
41.
WodeH. (1981) Learning a second language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
42.
XiangM.GroveJ.GiannakidouA. (2015). Semantic and pragmatic processes in the comprehension of negation: An event related potential study of negative polarity sensitivity. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 38, 71–88.
43.
ZwartsF. (1995). Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis, 25, 286–312.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
