This article uses the clitic left dislocation (CLLD) construction in L2 Spanish to investigate whether generative SLA has valuable insights to contribute to language teaching. Although CLLD is a structure that is commonly used by native speakers, as reported anecdotally and in at least one corpus, we found that native-Spanish and native-English teachers of Spanish have little metalinguistic knowledge of it. Crucially, we also found that CLLD does not appear consistently in Spanish textbooks. Additionally, it appears to be infrequent in the classroom input that learners receive, as we found in three lectures we recorded and tallied for CLLD usage rates. At the same time, study results show that the construction is learnable. Study abroad, that is, exposure to naturalistic input, appears to be a significant factor. Based on these collective findings, we suggest that learners at intermediate proficiency levels should be exposed to CLLD and that generative SLA is valuable to teachers in identifying such gaps in instruction.
BaltovaI. (1999). Multisensory language teaching in a multidimensional curriculum: The use of authentic bimodal video in core French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 31–48.
2.
Bruhn de GaravitoJ. (2013a). What research can tell us about teaching: The case of pronouns and clitics. In: WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (Eds.), Universal grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 17–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
3.
Bruhn de GaravitoJ. (2013b). Why theory and research are important to the practice of teaching. In: SchwieterJ. (Ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 85–106.
4.
BrunettiL.BottS.CostaJ.VallduvíE. (2011). A multilingual annotated corpus for the study of information structure. Paper presented at the Grammar and Corpora 2009 Conference.
5.
BygateM.SkehanP.SwainM. (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks in second language learning, teaching, and testing. New York: Pearson Education.
6.
ChomskyN. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
CrookesC.GassS. (1993). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
8.
de BotK. (2014). Moving where? A reaction to Slabakova et al. (2014). Applied Linguistics, 6, 261–264.
9.
DeKeyserR. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
FlynnS.MartohardjonoG. (1995). Toward theory-driven language pedagogy. In EckmanF.et al (Eds.) Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 45–59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
FosterP.TonkynA.WigglesworthG. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375.
13.
GassS. M.SelinkerL. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course(3rd ed.).London: Routledge.
14.
GilmoreA. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40, 97–118.
15.
KennedyM. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26, 4–12.
16.
KrashenS. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
17.
KumaravadiveluB. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. New York: Routledge.
18.
LealT.FarmerT.SlabakovaR. (2017). Fine-tuning of linguistic expectations over the course of L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 493–525.
19.
MillsG. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. 2nd edition.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
NorrisJ.OrtegaL. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
21.
PablosL. (2006). Pre-verbal structure building in Romance languages and Basque. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
22.
PeacockM. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51, 144–156.
23.
PliatsikasC.MarinisT. (2013). Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 167–182.
24.
QuesadaJ. (1997). Obituary: Adios to passive in Spanish. La Linguistique, 41–62.
25.
RankinT. (2013). Verb movement in Generative SLA and the teaching of word order patterns. In: WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (Eds.). Universal grammar and the second language classroom. The Netherlands: Springer, 57–76.
26.
RothmanJ. (2009). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 951–973.
27.
SlabakovaR. (2015). The effect of construction frequency and native transfer on second language knowledge of the syntax–discourse interface. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 671–699.
28.
SlabakovaR. (2016). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
SlabakovaR.IvanovI. (2011). A more careful look at the syntax–discourse interface. Lingua, 121, 637–651.
30.
SlabakovaR.LealT.Liskin-GasparroJ. (2014). We have moved on: Current concepts and positions in generative SLA. Applied Linguistics, 35, 601–606.
31.
SoraceA.FiliaciF. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368.
32.
SpadaN.TomitaY. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
33.
TraheyM.WhiteL. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Second Language Research, 12, 111–139.
34.
ValenzuelaE. (2005). L2 ultimate attainment and the syntax/discourse interface: The acquisition of topic constructions in non-native Spanish and English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
35.
ValenzuelaE.McCormackB. (2013). The syntax–discourse interface and the interface between generative theory and pedagogical approaches to SLA. In: WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (Eds.), Universal grammar and the second language classroom. The Netherlands: Springer, 101–114.
36.
VanPattenB. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
37.
VanPattenB.RothmanJ. (2013). Against ‘rules’. In: LavalC.ArcheM.J. (Eds.). The Grammar dimension in instructed SLA: Theory, research, and practice. London: Continuum Press, 15–36.
WhiteL. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied linguistics, 8, 95–110.
40.
WhiteL. (1990/91). The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 1, 337–360.
41.
WhiteL. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133–161.
42.
WhiteL. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
WhongM. (2013). Applied Generative SLA: The Need for an Agenda and a Methodology. In WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (Eds.). Universal grammar and the second language classroom. The Netherlands: Springer, 231–247.
44.
WhongM.GilK.H.MarsdenH. (2013) Universal grammar and the second language classroom. Dordrecht: Springer.
45.
WiddowsonH. (2000). Object language and the language subject: On the mediating role of applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 21–33.
46.
YoungR. (1995). Conversational styles in language proficiency interviews. Language Learning, 45, 3–42.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
