The current project longitudinally investigated the extent to which first-year Japanese university students developed their second language (L2) oral ability in relation to increased input in foreign language classrooms. Their spontaneous speech was elicited at the beginning, middle and end of one academic year, and then judged by linguistically trained coders for pronunciation, fluency, vocabulary and grammar qualities. According to the statistical analyses, the total amount of input (operationalized as number of English classes taken and L2 use outside of classrooms) was significantly related to the participants’ quick and immediate development of fluency and lexicogrammar during the first semester. Their pronunciation development was mixed, either subject to continuous change over two academic semesters (for prosody) or limited within the timeframe of the study (for segmentals). Similar to naturalistic L2 speech learning, the findings support the multifaceted role of input in different areas of oral proficiency development in foreign language classrooms.
AbrahamssonN.HyltenstamK. (2009). Age of acquisition and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception vs. linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.
2.
AhmadianM.J.TavakoliM. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59.
3.
BoskerH.R.PingetA.-F.QuenéH.. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30, 159–175.
4.
CrossleyS.A.SalsburyT.McnamaraD.S. (2015). Assessing lexical proficiency using analytic ratings: A case for collocation accuracy. Applied Linguistics, 36, 570–590.
5.
De JongN.H.SteinelM.P.FlorijnA.F.. (2012). Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 5–34.
6.
DeKeyserR. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 1–16.
8.
DerwingT.M.MunroM.J. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42, 476–490.
9.
DerwingT.M.RossiterM.J.MunroM.J.ThomsonR.I. (2004). L2 fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679.
10.
EllisN.C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24.
11.
EllisR. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
12.
FieldJ. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 399–423.
13.
FlegeJ.E. (2009). Give input a chance! In PiskeT.Young-ScholtenM. (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 175–190). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
14.
FlegeJ.FletcherK. (1992). Talker and listener effects on the perception of degree of foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389.
15.
FlegeJ.LiuS. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.
16.
GassS. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
IsaacsT.ThomsonR.I. (2013). Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10, 135–159.
18.
IsaacsT.TrofimovichP. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505.
19.
NishinoT.WatanabeM. (2008). Communication-oriented policies versus classroom realities in Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 133–138.
20.
KoizumiR.In’namiY. (2012). Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40, 554–564.
21.
KozakiY.RossS.J. (2011). Contextual dynamics in foreign language learning motivation. Language Learning, 61, 1328–1354.
22.
Larson-HallJ. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24, 35–63.
23.
MoraJ.C.Valls-FerrerM. (2012). Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 610–641.
24.
MoyerA. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age motivation and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.
25.
MuñozC. (2006). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF Project. In MuñozC. (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 1–40). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
26.
MuñozC. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 24, 578–596.
27.
MuñozC. (2014). Contrasting effects of starting age and input on the oral performance of foreign language learners. Applied Linguistics, 35, 463–482.
28.
MuñozC.LlanesÀ. (2014). Study abroad and changes in degree of foreign accent in children and adults. The Modern Language Journal. 98, 432–449.
29.
MunroM.DerwingT. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58, 479–502.
30.
MunroM.J.DerwingT.M. (2013). English L2 vowel acquisition over seven years. In LevisJ.LeVelleK. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Ames, A: Iowa State University.
31.
MunroM.DerwingT. (2014, March). How different can you get? Ten-year learning trajectories for two L2 groups. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Portland, OR.
32.
PiskeT.MacKayI.FlegeJ. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accents in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.
33.
PiskeT.FlegeJ.MacKayMeadorD. (2011). Investigating native and non-native vowels produced in conversational speech. In WrembelM.KulM.Dziubalska-KołaczykK. (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds 2010 (pp. 195–205). Switzerland: Peter Lang.
34.
RebuschatP. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63, 595–626.
35.
RichardsJ.RodgersT. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2nd edition.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SaitoK. (2015). Experience effects on the development of late second language learners’ oral proficiency. Language Learning, 65, 563–595.
37.
SaitoK.AkiyamaY. (2016). Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning. Electronic publication ahead of print version. Published online: 15June2016 (doi: 10.1111/lang.12184).
38.
SaitoK.HanzawaK. (2016). Developing second language speaking proficiency in foreign language classrooms: The role of the length and focus of instruction and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 813–840.
39.
SaitoK.TrofimovichP.IsaacsT. (2015). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics. Electronic publication ahead of print version. Published online: 29September2015 (doi: 10.1093/applin/amv047).
40.
SaitoK.TrofimovichP.IsaacsT. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 217–240.
41.
SchulzR.A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA–Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 244–258.
42.
SegalowitzN.FreedB.F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 173–199.
43.
ShintaniN.LiS.EllisR. (2013). Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63, 296–329.
44.
SkehanP. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36, 367–384.
45.
SpadaN. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 29, 73–87.
46.
SpadaN.TomitaY. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
47.
ThaiC.BoersF. (2016). Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 369–393.
48.
TrofimovichP.LightbownP.M.HalterR.SongH. (2009). Comprehension-based practice: The development of L2 pronunciation in a listening and reading program. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 609–639.
49.
VanPattenB. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755–803.
50.
VercellottiM.L. (2015). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistic. Electronic publication ahead of print version. Published online: 13March2015 (doi: 10.1093/applin/amv002).
51.
YashimaT.Zenuk-NishideL.ShimizuK. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54, 119–152.
52.
YuanF.EllisR. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27.
