The present study investigated which factors would best predict second-language (L2) fluency in a group of long-term L2 speakers of different English varieties with German as their first language.
Design/methodology/approach:
L2 fluency was conceptualized in terms of utterance fluency for which speed, breakdown and repair fluency were distinguished.
Data and analysis:
Multiple measures of utterance fluency were applied to four-minute speech fragments originating from 102 spontaneous oral interviews. Interviewees’ ages of onset ranged from 7 to 17, whereas their ages at interview ranged from 57 to 87. Multifactorial analyses yielded significant effects of age at interview.
Findings/conclusions:
Whereas the mean number of silent pauses and repairs increases, syllable duration decreases. This leaves room for interpretation as to why we find an aging effect. Overall, the evidence suggests that the usual, L2 acquisition-specific factors, such as age of onset or length of residence, are no longer at play to predict L2 fluency.
Originality and significance/implications:
To this point L2 fluency in very advanced, highly proficient L2 speakers has received little attention. The results point to the need for more research into highly proficient L2 users.
AbrahamssonN.HyltenstamK. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.
2.
AkaikeH. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723.
3.
BaayenR. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
5.
BirdsongD.MolisM. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.
6.
BlankevoortC. G.ScherderE. J. A.WielingM. B.HortobágyiT.BrouwerW. H.GeuzeR. H.van HeuvelenM. J. G. (2013). Physical predictors of cognitive performance in healthy older adults: A cross-sectional analysis. PLoS ONE, 8, e70799.
7.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] (Version 5.3.76). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
8.
BortfeldH.LeonS. D.BloomJ. E.SchoberM. F.BrennanS. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44, 123–147.
9.
BoskerH. R.PingetA. F.QuenéH.SandersT.De JongN. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30, 159–175.
10.
BurkeD. M.ShaftoM. A. (2008). Language and aging. In CraikF. I. M.SalthouseT. A. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 373–443). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
11.
ChambersF. (1997). What do we mean by fluency?System, 25, 535–544.
12.
CucchiariniC.StrikH.BovesL. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 989–999.
13.
CucchiariniC.StrikH.BovesL. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2862–2873.
14.
De BotK. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–24.
De JongN. H.BoskerH. R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In Proceedings of Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, DiSS (pp. 17–20). Stockholm: Universitetsservice US-AB.
17.
De JongN. H.GroenhoutR.SchoonenR.HulstijnJ. H. (2013). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1–21.
18.
De JongN. H.SteinelM. P.FlorijnA.SchoonenR.HulstijnJ. H. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 05, 893–916.
19.
De JongN. H.WempeT. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 385–390.
20.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63, 163–185.
21.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J.ThomsonR. I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. doi:10.1093/applin/amm041
22.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J.ThomsonR. I.RossiterM. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557.
23.
DerwingT. M.RossiterM. J.MunroM. J.ThomsonR. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679.
24.
ElsendoornB. A. G. (1984). Tolerances of durational properties in British English vowels. (Doctoral Dissertation).
25.
FillmoreC. J. (1979). On fluency. In KemplerD.SYW.FillmoreC. J. (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–102). New York, NY: Academic Press.
26.
FlegeJ. E. (1979). Phonetic interference in second language acquisition. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Linguistics, Indiana University, Bloomington.
27.
Forsberg LundellF.BartningI.EngelH.GudmundsonA.HancokV.LindqvistC. (2013). Beyond advanced stages in high-level spoken L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies, 24, 255–280.
28.
GelderenA. van. (1994). Prediction of global ratings of fluency and delivery in narrative discourse by linguistic and phonetic measures- oral performances of students aged 11-12 years. Language Testing, 11, 291–319.
29.
GintherA.DimovaS.YangR. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27, 379–399.
30.
GötzS. (2013). Fluency in native and nonnative English speech. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
31.
GranenaG.LongM. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29, 311–343.
32.
GuionS. G.FlegeJ. E.LiuS. H.Yeni-KomshianG. H. (2000). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 205–228.
33.
HellerR. B.DobbsA. R. (1993). Age differences in word finding in discourse and nondiscourse situations. Psychology and Aging, 8, 443–450.
34.
HellmanA. B. (2011). Vocabulary size and depth of word knowledge in adult-onset second language acquisition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21, 162–182.
35.
HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
36.
IwashitaN. (2010). Features of oral proficiency in task performance by EFL and JFL learners. In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 32–47).
37.
IwashitaN.BrownA.McNamaraT. i.O’HaganS. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct?Applied Linguistics, 29, 24–49.
38.
JohnsonJ. S.NewportE. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.
39.
JohnsonJ. S.NewportE. L. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language* 1. Cognition, 39, 215–258.
40.
KemperS.RashS.KynetteD.NormanS. (1990). Telling stories: The structure of adults’ narratives. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 205–228.
41.
KormosJ.DénesM. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 145–164.
42.
LennonP. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387–417.
43.
LennonP. (2000). The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In RiggenbachH. (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 25–42). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
44.
LeveltW. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
MackayI. R. A.FlegeJ. E. (2004). Effects of the age of second language learning on the duration of first and second language sentences: The role of suppression. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 373–396.
46.
MizeraG. J. (2006). Working memory and L2 Oral Fluency (Doctoral dissertation), University of Pittsburgh, United States. Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/7655/
47.
MunroM. J.DerwingT. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97.
48.
OyamaS. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283.
49.
PawleyA.SyderF. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In RichardsJ. C.SchmidtR. (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). London, UK: Longman.
50.
PiskeT.MacKayI. R. A.FlegeJ. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.
51.
RamscarM.HendrixP.ShaoulC.MilinP.BaayenH. (2014). The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 5–42.
52.
RehbeinJ. (1987). On fluency in second language speech. In DechertH. W.RaupachM. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic models of production (pp. 97–105). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53.
RiazantsevaA. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 497–526.
54.
RossiterM. J. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 65, 395–412.
55.
SchmidM. S.DusseldorpE. (2010). Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition: The impact of extralinguistic factors. Second Language Research, 26, 125–160.
56.
SchmidtR. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357–385.
57.
Schmitter-EdgecombeM.VesneskiM.JonesD. W. R. (2000). Aging and word-finding: A comparison of spontaneous and constrained naming tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 479–493.
58.
SegalowitzN. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
59.
SkehanP. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14.
60.
StevensG. (2006). The age-length-onset problem in research on second language acquisition among immigrants. Language Learning, 56, 671–692.
61.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
62.
TowellR.HawkinsR.BazerguiN. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84–119.
63.
TrofimovichP.BakerW. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1–30.
64.
WielingM.NerbonneJ.BaayenR. H. (2011). Quantitative social dialectology: Explaining linguistic variation geographically and socially. PLoS ONE, 6, e23613.
65.
WinterB. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.5499.pdf
66.
WurmL. H.FisicaroS. A. (2014). What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 37–48.
