Most studies on task-based language learning focus on the oral performance of advanced level learners of English as a second language (ESL), while little research examines the written performance of beginning language learners in non-ESL contexts. This exploratory study aims to address this gap, by examining the effect of pre-writing tasks on second language (L2) writing among 24 first-semester learners of German. One group completed collaborative, meaning-focused pre-writing tasks, while the comparison group completed grammar-focused activities, also in pairs. In line with task-based language research, learners’ performance was analysed in terms of complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexical richness, as well as a global measure of quality, to reflect the multi-componential nature of L2 performance. The results suggest that collaborative, meaning-focused pre-writing tasks improved grammatical accuracy and lexical richness, as well as the overall quality of learners’ writing. The findings also offer insights into the effectiveness of using CAF and measures of communicative adequacy for analysing beginning L2 performance.
AtkinsonD. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 525–545.
2.
BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court Press.
3.
BultéB.HousenA. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In: HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
4.
BygateM.SamudaV. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In: EllisR. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–76). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
5.
ByrdD.R. (2011). Putting the writing process in action in the L2 classroom: Pre-writing techniques that work. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 64–76.
6.
ByrnesH.ManchónR.M. (Eds.) (2014). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
7.
ChenowethN.A.HayesJ.R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18, 80–98.
8.
de JongN.H.SteinelM.P.FlorijnA.SchoonenR.HulstijnJ.H. (2012). The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In: HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 121–142). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
9.
DiCamillaF.J.AntónM. (1997). The function of repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609–633.
10.
di DonatoR.ClydeM.VansantJ. (2012). Deutsch: Na Klar!Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
11.
di DonatoR. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In: LantolfJ.P.AppelG. (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12.
EllisR. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20.
13.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
EllisR. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In: EllisR. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second Language (pp. 3–36). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
15.
EllisR.YuanF. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59–84.
16.
ElolaI.OskozA. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 51–71.
17.
GassS.MackeyA.Ross-FeldmanL. (2011). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 61, 189–220.
18.
GhavamniaM.TavakoliM.EstekiM. (2013). The effect of pre-task and online planning conditions on complexity, accuracy, and fluency on EFL learners’ written production. Porta Linguarum, 20, 31–43.
19.
GilabertR. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215–240.
20.
HornungA. (2000). Method awareness and the teaching of writing. In: BräuerG. (Ed.), Writing across languages (pp. 131–140). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
21.
HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. Eds. (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
22.
HudsonR.F.LaneH.B.MercerC.D. (2005). Writing prompts: The role of various priming conditions on the compositional fluency of developing writers. Reading and Writing, 18, 473–495.
23.
JohnsonM.D.MercadoL.AcevedoA. (2012). The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 264–282.
24.
KobayashiH.RinnertC. (2008). Task response and text construction across L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 7–29.
25.
KoizumiR. (2012). Relationships between text length and lexical diversity measures: Can we use short texts of less than 100 tokens?Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 1, 60–69.
26.
KuikenF.VedderI. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48–60.
27.
KuikenF.VedderI. (2012). Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. In: HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (Eds.) Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 143–170). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
28.
KuikenF.VedderI.GilabertR. (2010). Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In: BartningI.MartinM.VedderI. (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 81–100). EuroSLA Monograph Series 1, European Second Language Association. Retrieved from eurosla.org/monographs/EM01/EM01home.html
29.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.
30.
LevkinaM.GilabertR. (2012). The effects of cognitive task complexity on L2 oral production. In: HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (Eds.) Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 171–197). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
31.
LynchT.MacleanJ. (2001). Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In: BygateM.SkehanP.SwainM. (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). Harlow: Longman.
32.
ManchónR.M.de HaanP. (2008). Writing in foreign language contexts: An introduction (Editorial). Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 1–6.
33.
MuncieJ. (2002). Process writing and vocabulary development: Comparing lexical frequency profiles across drafts. System, 30, 225–235.
34.
MylesF. (2012). Complexity, accuracy and fluency: The role played by formulaic sequences in early interlanguage development. In: HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (Eds.) Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 71–94). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
35.
NeumannH.McDonoughK. (2014). Exploring the relationships among student preferences, prewriting tasks, and text quality in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 14–26.
36.
NeumannH.McDonoughK. (2015). Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 84–104.
37.
NorrisJ.M.OrtegaL. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
38.
NorrisJ.M.OrtegaL. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578.
39.
O’BrienT. (2004). Writing in a foreign language: Teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 37, 1–28.
40.
OjimaM. (2006). Concept mapping a pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System, 34, 566–585.
41.
OngJ.ZhangL.J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 218–233.
42.
OrtegaL. (1999). Planning and focus on form in oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 108–148.
43.
OrtegaL. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In: EllisR. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–110). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
PolioC.SheaM.C. (2014). An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10–27.
46.
ReicheltM.LefkowitzN.RinnertC.SchultzJ.M. (2012). Key Issues in foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 22–41.
47.
RobinsonD.W. (2000). Building consensus on the scoring of students’ writing: A comparison of teacher scores versus native informants’ scores. The French Review, 73, 667–688.
ShiL. (1998). Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students’ compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 319–345.
50.
SkehanP. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.
51.
SkehanP.FosterP. (2012). Complexity, accuracy fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research. In: HousenA.KuikenF.VedderI. (Eds.). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
52.
StorchN. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 5, 119–158.
VerspoorM.SchmidM.S.XuX. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 239–263.
55.
WeissbergR. (2006). Connecting speaking and writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
56.
WilliamsJ. (2005). Teaching writing in second and foreign language classrooms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57.
WilliamsJ. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331.
58.
YuanF.EllisR. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–27.
