If known words can be defined psycholinguistically as ‘form–meaning mappings’, the present article investigates whether prompting learners to evaluate whether the form of a new second language (L2) word fits its meaning generates ‘mapping elaborations’ that aid recall. Thirty Dutch-speaking upper-intermediate learners of English were invited to rate and motivate the degree of congruency they perceived between the form and meaning of 14 novel L2 words. Their ability to recall the form and the meaning of the target words was measured in an unannounced post-test. Recall was found to be positively related to the number of learner-generated mapping elaborations triggered by the task. Elaborations of a sound–symbolic nature appeared particularly useful for rendering the form of new words memorable.
AndersonJ.R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications. 5th edition. New York: Worth Publishers.
2.
AtayD.OzbulganC. (2007). Memory strategy instruction, contextual learning and ESP vocabulary recall. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 39–51.
3.
BaddeleyA. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. Revised edition. Hove: Psychology Press.
4.
BarcroftJ. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323–363.
5.
BarcroftJ. (2003). Effects of questions about word meaning during L2 Spanish lexical learning. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 546–561.
6.
BarcroftJ. (2004). Theoretical and methodological issues in research on semantic and structural elaboration in lexical acquisition. In: VanPattenB.WilliamsJ.RottS.OverstreetM. (Eds.), Form–meaning connections in SLA (pp. 219–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BarcroftJ. (2006). Can writing a new word detract from learning it? More negative effects of forced output during vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 22, 487–497.
8.
BarcroftJ.RottS. (2010). Partial word form learning in the written mode in L2 German and Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 623–650.
9.
BarcroftJ.SommersM.S.SundermanG. (2011). Some costs of fooling Mother Nature: A priming study on the Keyword Method and the quality of developing L2 lexical representations. In: TrofimovichP.McDonoughK. (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
10.
BoersF.DeconinckJ.LindstrombergS. (2010). Choosing motivated chunks for learning. In: De KnopS.BoersF.De RyckerT. (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 239–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
11.
BoersF.LindstrombergS. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12.
CenozJ. (2003). The role of typology in the organization of the multilingual lexicon. In: CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 103–116). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
13.
ClyneM. (2003). The dynamics of language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CohenA.D.AphekE. (1980). Retention of second-language vocabulary over time: Investigating the role of mnemonic associations. System, 8, 221–235.
15.
CohenA.D.AphekE. (1981). Easifying second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 221–236.
16.
CookG. (2001). ‘The philosopher pulled the lower jaw of the hen’: Ludicrous invented sentences in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 22, 366–387.
17.
CookV.J. (1995). Multi-competence and the learning of many languages. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 8, 93–98.
18.
Council of Europe (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CraikF.I.M.TulvingE. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.
20.
CroftL.B. (1978). The mnemonic use of linguistic iconicity in teaching language and literature. Slavic and East European Journal, 22, 509–518.
21.
DeconinckJ.BoersF.EyckmansJ. (2010). Helping learners engage with L2 words: The form–meaning fit. AILA Review, 23, 95–11.
22.
DeconinckJ.BoersF.EyckmansJ. (2014). Looking for form–meaning motivation in new L2 words: A think-aloud study among proficient learners of English. English Text Construction, 7, 249–280.
23.
De la FuenteM.J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10, 263–295.
24.
DoughtyC.J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In DoughtyC.LongM.H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25.
DoughtyC.J.WilliamsJ. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
ElgortI. (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367–413.
27.
EllisN.C.BeatonA. (1993). Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 533–558.
28.
FrantzenD. (2010). Evidence of incremental vocabulary learning in advanced L2 Spanish learners. In: Chacón-BeltránR.Abello-ContesseC.Torreblanca-LópezM. (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 126–142). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
29.
GibsonM.HufeisenB. (2003). Investigating the role of prior foreign language knowledge: Translating from an unknown into a known foreign language. In: CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 87–102). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
30.
GuP.Y. (2003). Fine brush and free hand: The vocabulary-learning art of two successful Chinese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 73–104.
31.
HallC.J. (2002). The automatic cognate form assumption: Evidence of the parasitic model of vocabulary development. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 69–87.
32.
HallC.J.EckeP. (2003). Parasitism as a default mechanism in L3 vocabulary acquisition. In: CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 71–85). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
33.
HallC.J.NewbrandD.EckeP.SperrU.MarchandV.HayesL. (2009). Learners’ implicit assumptions about syntactic frames in new L3 words: The role of cognates, typological proximity, and L2 status. Language Learning, 59, 153–202.
34.
HamiltonM.RajaramS. (2001). The concreteness effect in implicit and explicit memory tests. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 96–117.
35.
HanZ.-H.PeverlyT. (2007). Input processing: A study of ab initio learners with multilingual backgrounds. International Journal of Multiculturalism, 4, 17–37.
36.
HulstijnJ.H. (1997). Mnemonic methods in foreign language vocabulary learning. In: CoadyJ.HuckinT. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 203–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
HulstijnJ.H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In: RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
HulstijnJ.H.LauferB (2001). Some empirical evidence of the Involvement Load Hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–558.
39.
HulstijnJ.H.HollanderM.GreidanusT. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and re-occurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 327–339.
40.
HummelK.M. (2010). Translation and short-term L2 vocabulary retention: Hindrance or help?Language Teaching Research, 14, 61–74.
JessnerU. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
43.
JessnerU. (2008). Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language Teaching, 41, 15–56.
44.
KantartzisK.KitaS.ImaiM. (2011). Japanese sound symbolism facilitates word learning in English speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35, 626–630.
45.
KeatingG.D. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12, 365–386.
46.
KramschC. (2009). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about the experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
LauferB. (1988). The concept of ‘synforms’ (similar lexical forms) in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language and Education, 2, 113–132.
48.
LauferB. (1991). Some properties of the foreign language learner’s lexicon as evidenced by lexical confusions. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 317–330.
49.
LauferB. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In: CoadyJ.HuckinT.N. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
LauferB. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.
51.
LauferB. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EuroSLA Yearbook, 5, 223–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52.
LauferB. (2010). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning. In: Chacón-BeltránR.Abello-ContesseC.Torreblanca-LópezM. (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 15–27). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
53.
LauferB.GirsaiN. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694–716.
54.
LockhartR.S. (2002). Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding. Memory, 10, 397–403.
55.
LongM.H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In: de BotK.GinsbergR.KramschC. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56.
MorrisC.D.BransfordJ.D.FranksJ.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.
57.
NationI.S.P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another Language. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
NygaardL.C.CookA.E.NamyL.L. (2009). Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition, 112, 181–186.
59.
O’MalleyJ.ChamotA. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
OrtegaL. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.
61.
PaivioA.DesrochersA. (1981). Mnemonic techniques in second-language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 780–795.
62.
ParaultS.JSchwanenflugelP.J. (2006). Sound–symbolism: A piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of Psychological Research, 35, 329–351.
63.
ParibakhtT.S. (2010). The effect of lexicalization in the native language on second language lexical inferencing: A cross-lexical study. In: Chacón-BeltránR.Abello-ContesseC.Torreblanca-LópezM. (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 61–82). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
64.
ParkE.S.HanZ. (2007). Learner spontaneous attention in second language input processing: An exploratory study. In HanZ.ParkE.S. (Eds.), Understanding second language process (pp. 106–132). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
65.
PetersE. (2014). The effects of repetition and time of post-test administration on EFL learners’ form recall of single words and collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18, 75–94.
66.
PressleyM.LevinJ.R.MillerG.E. (1982). The keyword method compared to alternative vocabulary-learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 50–60.
67.
RaddenG.PantherK.-U. (Eds.) (2004). Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
68.
ReadJ. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In: BogaardsP.LauferB. (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language (pp. 209–228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
69.
RingbomH. (2007). Cross-lexical similarity in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
70.
RottS. (2005). Processing glosses: A qualitative exploration of how form–meaning connections are established and strengthened. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 95–124.
71.
SanaouiR. (1995). Adult learner’s approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 15–28.
72.
SchmittN. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.
73.
SchmittN. (2010). Key issues in teaching and learning vocabulary. In: Chacón-BeltránR.Abello-ContesseC.Torreblanca-LópezM. (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 28–40). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
74.
SingletonD. (2003). Perspectives on the multilingual lexicon: A critical synthesis. In: CenozJ.HufeisenB.JessnerU. (Eds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 167–176). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
75.
SteinelM.P.HulstijnJ.H.SteinelW. (2007). Second language idiom learning in a paired-associate paradigm: Effects of direction of learning, direction of testing, idiom imageability, and idiom transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 449–484.
76.
TrofimovichP. (2008). What do second language listeners know about spoken words? Effects of experience and attention in spoken word processing. Journal Psycholinguist Research, 37, 309–329.
77.
VanPattenB. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.
78.
VanPattenB. (2000). Processing instruction as form–meaning connections: Issues in theory and research. In: LeeJ.F.ValdmanA. (Eds.), Form and meaning: Multiple perspectives (pp. 43–68). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
79.
VasiljevicZ. (2010). Word associations as a vocabulary teaching strategy in an advanced reading class. In: Chacón-BeltránR.Abello-ContesseC.Torreblanca-LópezM. (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 186–205). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
80.
WalkerI.HulmeC. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1256–1271.
81.
WebbS. (2007). Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: The effects of a single context on vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 11, 63–81.
82.
WebbS. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 79–95.
