A review of the literature on language teaching reveals predominantly negative attitudes towards the use of translation in language teaching (TILT) (Cook, 2010). The purpose of this article is to explore the question of whether this negativity is reflected in the attitudes and behaviours of university lecturers engaged in language teaching as well as to consider the background and contextual factors associated with these attitudes and behaviours. A case study of one Irish Higher Education Institution was conducted, and qualitative interviews were carried out with six lecturers in Japanese and six in German in conjunction with a review of the relevant documentation including course outlines and module descriptors. The results indicated widespread support on the ground for the use of TILT in some form suggesting a need for further research on the impact of the use of TILT on the language learning process.
BerggrenI. (1972). Does the use of translation exercises have negative effects on the teaching of a second language? A pilot study based on an experiment with two methods of teaching carried out on the beginners in the autumn term 1971. Projektet språkfärdighet i engelska (SPRENG). Rapport 14. Göteborgs Universitet: EngelskaInstitutionen/Pedagogiska Institutionen.
2.
Brooks-LewisK.A. (2009). Adult learners’ perceptions of the incorporation of their L1 in foreign language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics, 30, 216–235.
3.
BrumfitC.J.JohnsonK.(Eds.). (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BuckG. (1992). Translation as a language testing procedure: does it work?Language Testing, 9, 123–148.
5.
ButzkammW.CaldwellJ.A.W. (2009). The bilingual reform: A paradigm shift in foreign language teaching. Tübingen: Narr Studienbucher.
6.
CarreresA.Noriega-SanchezM. (2011). Translation in language teaching: Insights from professional translator training. The Language Learning Journal, 39, 281–297.
7.
CelikM. (2003). Teaching vocabulary through code-mixing. English Language Teaching Journal, 57, 361–369.
8.
CookG. (2009). Use of translation in language teaching. In BakerM.SaldanhaG. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies (2nd ed., pp. 112–115). New York/London: Routledge.
9.
CookG. (2010). Translation in language teaching: An argument for reassessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
CookG. (2013). Translation in language teaching. In ByramM.HuA. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (2nd ed., pp. 737–740). New York/London: Routledge.
11.
DuffA. (1989). Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
EdstromA. (2006). L1 Use in the L2 Classroom: One teacher’s self-evaluation. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 3, 275–292.
13.
Gonzalez-DaviesM. (2004). Multiple voices in the translation classroom: Activities, tasks and projects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
HallG.CookG. (2012). Own-language use in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 45, 271–308.
15.
HarmerJ. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman.
16.
HowattA.P.R.WiddowsonH.G. (2004). A history of English language teaching (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
IronsJ. (1998). Der var saa deiligt ude paa Landet [It was so lovely out there in the country]. Sprogforum, 11, 26–32.
18.
KallkvistM. (1998). How different are the results of translation tasks? A study of lexical errors. In MalmkjærK. (Ed.), Translation and language teaching (pp. 77–87). Manchester: St. Jerome.
19.
Klein-BraleyC. (1987). Fossil at Large: Translation as a language testing procedure. In GrotjahnR.Klein-BraleyC.StevensonD.K. (Eds.), Taking their measure: The validity and validation of language test (pp. 111–132). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
20.
Klein-BraleyC.FranklinP. (1998). The foreigner in the refrigerator, remarks about teaching translation to university students of foreign languages. In MalmkjærK. (Ed.), Translation and language teaching (pp. 53–61). Manchester: St. Jerome.
21.
KochE. (1947). Functionalism in foreign language teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 31, 266–271.
22.
KrashenS.D.TerrellT.D. (1998). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Prentice Hall International.
23.
LadoR. (1964). Language teaching: A scientific approach. New York/San Francisco/ Toronto/London: McGraw-Hill.
24.
LauferB.GirsaiN. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694–716.
25.
LemsK.MillerL.SoroT. (2010). Teaching reading to English language learners: Insights from linguistics. New York: Guilford Publications.
26.
MalmkjærK.(Ed.) (1998). Translation and language teaching. Manchester: St. Jerome.
27.
NewsonD. (1998). Translation and foreign language teaching. In MalmkjærK. (Ed.), Translation and language teaching (pp. 63–68). Manchester: St. Jerome.
28.
SchererG.A.C.WertheimerM. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign-language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
SchjoldagerA. (2003). Translation for language purposes: Preliminary results of an experimental study of translation and picture verbalisation. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics, 30, 199–213.
30.
SchjoldagerA. (2004). Are L2 learners more prone to err when they translate? In MalmkjærK.McEneryA.E. (Eds.), Translation in undergraduate degree programmes (pp. 127–14). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
31.
Snell-HornbyM. (1985). Translation as a means of integrating language teaching and linguistics. In TitfordC.HiekeA.E. (Eds.), Translation in foreign language teaching and testing, (pp. 21–28). Tuübingen: G. Narr.
32.
StibbardR. (1998). The principled use of oral translation in foreign language teaching. In MalmkjærK., (Ed.), Translation and language teaching (pp. 69–76). Manchester: St. Jerome.
33.
UrP. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
ViëtorW. (1880a). Schriftlehre oder Sprachlehre? Zur Behandlung der neufranzösischen Laut- und Formenlehre in der Schule [Teaching writing or teaching language? Dealing with modern French phonology and morphology in school]. Zeitschrift für neufranzösische Sprache und Litteratur, 2, 43–62.
35.
ViëtorW. (1880b). Die wissenschaftliche Grammatik und der englische Unterricht [Scientific grammar and the teaching of English]. Englische Studien, 3, 106–124.
36.
ViëtorW. (1882). Der Sprachunterricht muss umkehren! Ein Beitrag zur Überbürdungsfrage [Language teaching has to start afresh: A contribution to the debate about over-burdening]. Heilbronn: Henninger. Published under the pseudonym ‘Quousque tandem’.
37.
WitteA.HardenT.Ramos de Oliviero HardenA. (2009). Translation in second language learning and teaching. New York: Peter Lang.
