This article assesses the impact of a UK-based professional development programme on curriculum innovation and change in English Language Education (ELE) in Western China. Based on interviews, focus group discussions and observation of a total of 48 English teachers who had participated in an overseas professional development programme influenced by modern approaches to education and ELE, and 9 of their colleagues who had not taken part, it assesses the uptake of new approaches on teachers’ return to China. Interviews with 10 senior managers provided supplementary data. Using Diffusion of Innovations Theory as the conceptual framework, we examine those aspects of the Chinese situation that are supportive of change and those that constrain innovation. We offer evidence of innovation in classroom practice on the part of returnees and ‘reinvention’ of the innovation to ensure a better fit with local needs. The key role of course participants as opinion leaders in the diffusion of new ideas is also explored. We conclude that the selective uptake of this innovation is under way and likely to be sustained against a background of continued curriculum reform in China.
AdamsonB.MorrisP. (1997). The English curriculum in the People’s Republic of China. Comparative Education Review, 41, 3–26.
2.
BrownD. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching
(4th ed.). Harlow: Longman.
3.
ButlerY.G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36–57.
ConwayC.RichardsH. (2007). Meeting the needs of visiting in-service EFL teachers from China. The TESOLANZ Journal, 15, 71–87.
6.
CRAMLAP (Celtic, Regional and Minority Languages Abroad Project). (2006). An overview of second language teaching methods and approaches. Retrieved from: http://www.cramlap.org/Documentation (June2013).
7.
DelensM. (1999). Whose rules apply? Educational project management in less developed countries: Cultural considerations. In LeachF.LittleA. (Eds.), Education, cultures and economics: Dilemmas for development (pp. 347–369). New York & London: Falmer Press.
8.
EdwardsV.LiD. (2011). Confucius, constructivism and the impact of continuing professional development of teachers of English in China. London: British Council Research Papers.
9.
EllisG. (1996). How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach?ELT Journal, 50, 213–218.
10.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. 3rd edition.London: Routledge Falmer.
11.
GriersonA.L.GallagherT.L. (2009). Seeing is believing: Creating a catalyst for teacher change through a demonstration classroom professional development initiative. Professional Development in Education, 35, 567–584.
12.
GuQ. (2004). Intercultural experience and teachers’ professional development. ELTED, 8, 1–15.
13.
GuQ. (2005). The perception gap in cross-cultural training: An investigation of British Council English language teaching projects in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 25, 287–304.
14.
HarmerJ. (2003). Popular culture, methods, and context. ELT Journal, 57, 288–294.
15.
HuG. (2002). Recent important developments in secondary English-language teaching in the People’s Republic of China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15, 30–49.
16.
HuG. (2003). English language teaching in China: Regional differences and contributing factors. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24, 290–318.
17.
HuG. (2005a). Professional development of secondary EFL teachers: Lessons from China. Teachers College Record, 107, 654–705.
18.
HuG. (2005b). ‘CLT is best for China’ – an untenable, absolutist claim. ELT Journal, 59, 65–68.
19.
HüttnerJ.Mehlmauer-LarcherB.ReichlS.SchiftnerB. (2011). Introduction. In HüttnerJ.Mehlmauer-LarcherB.ReichlS.SchiftnerB. (Eds.), Theory and practice in EFL teacher education: Bridging the gap (pp. xiii–xix). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
20.
KennedyC. (1988). Innovation for a change: Teacher development and innovation. ELT Journal, 41, 163–170.
21.
KiddR. (1992). Teaching ESL grammar through dictation. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 10, 49–61.
22.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
LeachF. (1994). Expatriates as agents of cross-cultural transmission. Compare, 24, 217–231.
24.
LiaoX. (2004). The need for communicative language teaching in China. ELT Journal, 58, 270–273.
25.
LittlewoodW. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243–249.
26.
Ministry of Education. (2011). English curriculum standards for compulsory education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
RogersE.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edition.New York: Free Press.
35.
TanC. (2005). How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach for primary school children in Singapore?The Reading Matrix, 5, 21–35.
36.
WangQ. (2007). The national curriculum changes and their effects on English language teaching in the People’s Republic of China. In CumminsJ.DavisonC. (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 87–105). New York: Springer.
37.
WangQ. (2010). The rationale for the national curriculum standards for senior middle school. In WangQ.ZhangX. (Eds.) An analysis of the national English curriculum for senior middle school and implementation strategies (pp. 1–20). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
38.
WatersA. (2009). Managing innovation in English language education. Language Teaching, 42, 421–458.
WuY. (2001). English language teaching in China: Trends and challenges. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 191–194.
41.
Xinhua News. (2010). Guo jia zhong chang qi jiao yu gai ge he fa zhan gui hua gang yao (2010–2020) [National medium-to-long-term plan for education reform and development (2010–2020)]. Retrieved from: http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-07/29/content_1667143.htm (June2013).
42.
YanC. (2008). Mutual adaptation: Enhancing longer-term sustainability of cross-cultural in-service teacher training initiatives in China. System, 36, 586–606.
