Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Dynamic Assessment (DA) derives from Vygotsky’s (1987) insight that the use of mediation, attuned to learner needs, enables learners to perform beyond their current level of functioning, thereby providing insights into emerging capabilities. The instructional quality of mediation means that this process simultaneously creates possibilities for development, even over the course of a single session, a phenomenon referred to as ‘microgenesis’ (Wertsch, 1985). An important feature of DA is transfer, or transcendence: the process of tracking learner development as it unfolds not only with regard to control of tasks included in an assessment but also more complex and difficult tasks that build on those included in the original instrument (Campione, Brown, Ferrera, & Bryant, 1984; Feuerstein, Rand, & Hoffman, 1979; Poehner, 2007). The present study reports on the use of DA principles in tests of second language (L2) listening and reading comprehension delivered through an online format. The tests, which incorporate mediation, include transfer items to determine the extent to which learner development is supported during the test. This process generates three scores: actual (to capture unmediated performance); mediated (reflecting responsiveness to assistance provided on each test item); and a learning potential score (based on gain between actual and mediated performance) that indicates how much investment in future instructional activity is likely required for development to move forward.

Keywords

Computer-based testing dynamic assessment L2 comprehension assessment learning potential sociocultural theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ableeva

(2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Aljaafreh

Lantolf

J.P.

(1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483.

Brown

Ferrara

R.A.

(1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In Wertsch

J.V.

(Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Budoff

(1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In Lidz

C.S.

(Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 53–81). New York: Guilford Press.

Campione

J.C.

Brown

A.L.

Ferrera

R.A.

Bryant

N.R.

(1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences and learning. In Rogoff

Wertsch

J.V.

(Eds.), Children’s learning in the ‘zone of proximal development’ (pp. 77–91). San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass.

Feuerstein

Rand

Hoffman

M.B.

(1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

Feuerstein

Rand

Rynders

J.E.

(1988). Don’t accept me as I am: Helping retarded performers excel. New York: Plenum.

Glutting

J.J.

McDermott

P.A.

(1990). Principles and problems in learning potential. In Reynolds

C.R.

Kamphaus

R.W.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 296–347). New York: Guilford.

Guthke

Beckmann

J.F

(2000). The learning test concept and its applications in practice. In Lidz

C. S.

Elliott

J.G.

(Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp.17–69). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

10.

In’nami

Koizumi

(2009). A meta-analysis of test format effects on reading and listening test performance: Focus on multiple-choice and open-ended formats. Language Testing, 26, 219–244.

11.

Jacobs

E.L.

(2001). The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22, 217–226.

12.

Kozulin

Garb

(2002) Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23, 112–127.

13.

Lantolf

J.P.

Poehner

M.E.

(2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49–74.

14.

Lantolf

J.P.

Poehner

M.E.

(2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 15, 11–33.

15.

Leont’ev

A.N.

(1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.

16.

Lidz

(1991). Practioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.

17.

Poehner

M.E.

(2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 323–340.

18.

Poehner

M.E.

(2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.

19.

Poehner

M.E.

(2011). Dynamic assessment: Fairness through the prism of mediation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 99–112.

20.

Poehner

M.E.

van Compernolle

R.A.

(2011). Frames of interaction in dynamic assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 183–198.

21.

Ravitch

(2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.

22.

Sacks

(1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America’s testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

23.

Sternberg

R.J.

Grigorenko

E.L.

(2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Tzuriel

Shamir

(2002). The effects of mediation in computer assisted dynamic assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 21–32.

25.

Vygotsky

L.S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Vygotsky

L.S.

(1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber

R.W.

Carton

A.S.

(Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum.

27.

Wertsch

J.V.

(1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during Computerized Dynamic Assessment (C-DA)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References