The study reported in this article investigated the comparative effects of two types of treatment — one of which emphasized input and the other output — on the vocabulary acquisition of young EFL learners. In the input-based instruction, the students were not required to produce output whereas in the production-based instruction the students were required to produce output. Thirty-six Japanese children aged 6—8 were divided into three groups (input-based, production-based and control group), received six weeks instruction and took four types of vocabulary tests as a pre-, post- and delayed post-test. The findings provide further evidence that both input-based and production-based instruction lead to both receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. In general, the results show similar levels of effects for input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition. However, an examination of process features indicates that the input-based tasks provided opportunities for richer interaction for the learners than the production-based activities. This may explain the better performance of the input-based group on the task-based comprehension test and the same levels of achievement in the production tests despite relatively fewer opportunities for second language (L2) production.
Anderson, J.R. ( 1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Beretta, A. & Davies, A. ( 1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39, 121-27. Clark, E.V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Cook, V. ( 1991). Review: Universal grammar and second language acquisition . System, 19, 342-46. Daulton, F.E. (1999). List of high-frequency baseword vocabulary for Japanese EFL students. The Internet TESL Journal, 7.
4.
DeKeyser, R.M. & Sokalski, K.J. ( 1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613-42.
5.
DeKeyser, R.M. & Sokalski, K.J. ( 2001). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 51(s1), 81-112.
6.
de la Fuente, M.J. ( 2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112.
7.
Elley, W.B. ( 1989). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 174-87.
8.
Ellis, N. ( 1994). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of language (pp. 213-82). London : Academic Press.
9.
Ellis, N. & Beaton, A. ( 1993). Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46, 533-58.
10.
Ellis, R. ( 1993). Naturally simplified input, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M.L. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and application (pp. 53-68). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
11.
Ellis, R. ( 1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings . Applied Linguistics, 16, 409.
12.
Ellis, R. ( 1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13.
Ellis, R. ( 2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Ellis, R. ( 2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge . Language Learning, 54, 227-75.
15.
Ellis, R. ( 2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141-72.
16.
Ellis, R. ( 2008). The study of second language acquisition. Second edition. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Ellis, R. & He, X. ( 1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 21, 285-301.
18.
Ellis, R. & Heimbach, R. ( 1997). Bugs and birds: Children’s acquisition of second language vocabulary through interaction. System, 25, 247-59.
19.
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. ( 1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-91.
20.
Ellis, R., Heimbach, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. ( 1999). Modified input and the acquisition of word meanings by children and adults. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 63-114). Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins .
21.
Erlam, R. ( 2003). Evaluating the relative effectiveness of structured-input and output-based instruction in foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 559-82.
22.
Ernst, G. ( 1994). Talking circle: Conversation and negotiation in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 293-322.
23.
Hulstijn, J.H. ( 1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P.J.L. Arnaud & H. B’ejoint. (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113-25). London: Macmillan.
24.
Johnson, K. ( 1995). Understanding communication in second language classroom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Krashen, S. ( 1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition . Oxford: Pergamon.
26.
Krashen, S. ( 1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London/New York: Longman.
27.
Krashen, S. ( 1998). Comprehensible output? System, 26, 175-82.
28.
Laufer, B. ( 1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19, 255-71.
29.
Long, M.H. ( 1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 359-82.
30.
Loschky, L. ( 1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 16, 303-23.
31.
Nagata, H., Aline, D., & Ellis, R. ( 1999). Modified Input, language aptitude and the acquisition of word meanings. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 133-49). Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins .
32.
Oliver, R. ( 1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 372-86.
33.
Oliver, R. ( 2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions . The Modern Language Journal, 86, 97-111.
34.
Palmberg, R. ( 1987). Patterns of vocabulary development in foreign-language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 201-19.
35.
Penno, J., Wilkinson, I., & Moore, D. ( 2002). Vocabulary acquisition from teacher explanation and repeated listening to stories: Do they overcome the Matthew effect? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 23-33.
36.
Rohde, A. & Tiefenthal, C. ( 2000). Fast mapping in early L2 lexical acquisition. Studia Linguistica, 54, 167-74.
37.
Schmitt, N. ( 1994). Vocabulary testing: Questions for test development with six examples of tests of vocabulary size and depth. Thai TESOL Bulletin, 6, 9-16.
38.
Sinclair, J.M. & Coulthard, M. ( 1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
39.
Swain, M. ( 1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-56). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
40.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. ( 1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics , 16, 371-91.
41.
Takimoto, M. ( 2009). The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics , 30, 1-25.
42.
Ur, P. ( 1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Van den Branden, K. ( 1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners’ output . Language Learning, 47, 589-636.
44.
Van den Branden, K. ( 2000). Does negotiation of meaning promote reading comprehension? A study of multilingual primary school classes. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 426-43.
45.
Wells, G. & Montgomery, M. ( 1981). Adult-child interaction at home and at school. In P. French & M. McLure (Eds.), Adult-child conversation (pp. 210-43). New York: St Martin’s Press.
