Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching

Abstract

This article reports on a collective case study of four Hong Kong secondary school teachers’ experiences of constraints on teacher autonomy in English language teaching, and their implications for teacher education. Findings suggested that the constraints were systemic and mainly organized around ‘Schemes of Work’ and school-based supervision and surveillance mechanisms. Nevertheless, the four teachers were able to create spaces for teacher autonomy, but the nature of these spaces and what they were used for varied, partly according to the school context and partly according to the identities developed through previous experiences of the education system as learners and teachers. The study concludes that the impact of teacher education courses that depend on experimentation with new ideas in the classroom is liable to be limited in many state school systems. It also concludes that language teacher education may benefit from a greater sensitivity to the affordances in teachers’ working conditions for teacher autonomy and experimentation.

Keywords

teacher autonomy language teacher education teacher identity teacher biography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allwright, R.L. ( 2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 114-31.

Benson, P. ( 2000). Autonomy as a learners’ and teachers’ right . In B. Sinclair , I. McGrath , & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 111-17). London : Longman.

Benson, P. & Huang, J. ( 2008). Autonomy in the transition from foreign language learning to foreign language teaching. DELTA: Revista de Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 24, 421-39.

Breen, M.P. ( 2007). Appropriating uncertainty: ELT professional development in the new century. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (eds.), The international handbook of English language teaching: Volume 2 (pp. 1067-84). Norwell, MA : Springer.

Burns, A. ( 2009). Action research in second language teacher education . In A. Burns & J.C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 289-97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burton, J. (2009). Reflective practice. In A. Burns & J.C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 298-308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clement, M. & Vandenberghe, R. ( 2000). Teachers’ professional development: A solitary or collegial (ad)venture? Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1): 81-101.

Crookes, G. ( 1997). What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach? The Modern Language Journal, 81(1): 67-99.

Flores, M. ( 2001). Person and context in becoming a new teacher. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(2), 135-48.

10.

Freeman, D.E. & Freeman, Y.S. ( 1994). Between worlds: Access to second language acquisition . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

11.

Johnstone, R. ( 2004). Language teacher education. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 649-71). Oxford: Blackwell.

12.

Kvale, S. ( 1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Lamb, T.E. ( 2000). Finding a voice: Learner autonomy and teacher education in an urban context. In B. Sinclair , I. McGrath , & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 118-27). Harlow: Pearson Education.

14.

Little, D. ( 1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-82.

15.

Mackenzie, A. ( 2002). Changing contexts: Connecting teacher autonomy and institutional development. In A.S. Mackenzie & E. McCafferty (Eds.), Developing autonomy: Proceedings of the JALT CUE Conference 2001 (pp.223-32). Tokyo: The Japan Association for Language Teaching College and University Educators Special Interest Group.

16.

McGrath, I. ( 2000). Teacher autonomy. In B. Sinclair , I. McGrath , & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 100-10). Harlow : Pearson Education.

17.

Miller, J. (2009). Teacher identity . In A. Burns & J.C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 172-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Pearson, L.C. & Moomaw, W. ( 2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment and professionalism. Education Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37-53.

19.

Stake, R.E. ( 1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

20.

Stake, R.E. ( 2005). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

21.

Varghese, M. , Morgan, B. , Johnston, B. , & Johnson, K.A. ( 2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity & Education , 4(1), 21-44.

22.

Vieira, F. ( 2003). Addressing constraints on autonomy in school contexts: Lessons from working with teachers. In D. Palfreyman & R.C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 220-39). Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.

23.

Wong, L. & Benson, P. ( 2006). In-service CALL education: What happens after the course is over? In P. Hubbard and M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 251-64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.