Partnership working is central to the rubric of contemporary health policy. This paper discusses and analyses the STEP partnership model and the issues emerging for academic and service coalitions, which were formed for the purpose of implementing evidence-based practice in nine clinical centres. Using a framework for collaboration, key themes for successful partnerships are summarised in a model as contextual factors: articulating a clear purpose, identifying the capacity to collaborate, ensuring wide organisational ownership, nurturing fragile relationships and securing collaborative, mutually beneficial outcomes. The paper focuses on the experience of setting up, managing, supporting and evaluating the STEP partnership from the perspective of academic and clinical leads and the independent evaluation.
Callaghan G. , Exworthy M. , Hudson, B.et al. (2000) Prospects for collaboration in primary care: Relationships between social services and the new PCGs . Journal of Interprofessional Care14: 1, 19-26 .
2.
Closs S. , Cheater F (1999) Evidence for nursing practice: A clarification of the issues . Journal of Advanced Nursing30: 1, 10-17 .
3.
Department of Health (1989) Caring for People: Community care in the next decade and beyond (Griffiths report). London: HMSO , Cmnd 849.
4.
Department of Health (1999) A First Class Service-Quality in the NHS. London: HMSO .
5.
Dewar, S. (2000) Collaborating for quality: The need to strengthen accountability . Journal of Interprofessional Care1491: 31-37 .
6.
Gillam, S. (2000) Collaboration in The New NHS (Editorial) . Journal of Interprofessional Care14: 1, 5-7 .
7.
Haines, A. , Jones, R. (1994) Interpreting findings of research . British Medical Journal308: 1488-1492 .
8.
Haines, A. , Donald, A. (1998) Making use of research findings . British Medical Journal317: 1488-1492 .
9.
Hornby, S. (1993) Collaborative Care. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific .
10.
Hudson, B. , Hardy, B. , Henwood, M. , et al. (1999) In pursuit of inter-agency collaboration in the public sector . Public Management1: 2, 235-260 .
11.
Humphris, D. (1998) Managing knowledge into practice . Manual Therapy3: 3, 153-158 .
12.
Leathard, A. (1994) Going Interprofessional working together for health and welfare. London: Routledge .
13.
McLaren, S. , Ross F. (2000) Implementation of evidence in practice settings: Some methodological issues arising from the South Thames Evidence-based Practice Project . Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing4: 99-108 .
14.
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (1999) Getting evidence into practice . Effective Health Care Bulletin5: 1, 116 .
15.
Pettigrew, A. M. , Ferlie, E. , McKee, L. (1992) Shaping Strategic change. Sage: London .
16.
Poulton, B. , West, M. (1999) The determinants of effectiveness in primary health care teams . Journal of Interprofessional Care13: 1, 7-18 .
17.
Prochaska, J. O. , Di Clemente, C. U. (1983) Stages and processes of self-change: Towards an integrated model of change . Journal of Consultation in Clinical Psychology51: 390-395 .
18.
Rafferty, A. , Traynor, M. (1999) The research-practice gap in nursing: lessons from the research policy debate . Nursing Times Research4: 6, 458-465 .
19.
Redfern, S. , Christian S. , Murrells T.et al. (2000) Evaluation of Change in Practice: South Thames Evidence-based Practice Project (STEP). Unpublished report, Kings College London. Available from: Nursing Research Unit, King's College, London .
20.
Robbins, H. , Finley, M. (1997) Why Teams Don't Work. London . Orion Publishing.
21.
Rogers, E. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press .
22.
Ross, F. , McLaren, S. (2000) An Overview of Aims, Methods and Cross-case Analysis of Nine Implementation Projects. STEP Unpublished report, St George's Hospital Medical School/Kingston University. Available from: Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London .
23.
West, M. (1999) Communication and teamworking in healthcare . Nursing Times Research4: 1, 8-17 .
