The potential of the Internet as a valuable methodological tool for social
science research is increasingly being recognised. This paper contributes to the
debate surrounding virtual synchronous interviews and the value of online
research. Specifically it introduces the use of a software conferencing
technique - Hotline Connect - and discusses the implications of using the
technique for Internet- based research. In particular issues of interview
design, developing rapport, the role of insiders and outsiders in the research
process, language use and the virtual interface are considered. The paper draws
on the experience of a recent research project entitled ‘Cyberparents’ and
concludes that the use of conferencing software holds great potential for
synchronous online interviewing. However, this must be combined with sensitive,
ethical handling of both the research process and the data to overcome both the
weaknesses of this particular method and those inherent in any interviewing
situation.
BaymN. (1998) The
Emergence of Online Community, Chapter 2 In
JONESS.G. (Ed) Cybersociety 2.0:
Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community.Thousand Oakes:
Sage.
2.
BennettC.M. (1998) Men
Online: Discussing Lived Experiences on the Internet. Unpublished
thesis, James Cook University, North
Queensland, Australia. Available
at: <http://www.hotkey.net.au/∼carolineb>
3.
BergenR.K. (1993)
Interviewing survivors of marital rape: Doing feminist
research on sensitive topics. In
RENZETTIC, and LEER. (eds) Researching Sensitive
Topics.London:
Sage.
4.
BurgessR. (1984). In the
Field. An Introduction to Field Research.London: Allen and
Unwin.
ChristensenN.B. (1999). ‘Inuit
in Cyberspace: Practising and Constructing Computer-mediated
Space’, paper prepared for the 3rd Annual ARCUS Award for Arctic
Research Excellence.
7.
ComleyP. (1996). ‘The Use
of the Internet as a Data Collection Method’, <http://www.sga.co.uk/esomar.html> This link was correct as at
the 7/7/99, but the connection no longer exists.
DillonJ. (2000).
‘Battered women to tell their stories via
email’.The Independent on Sunday, January 30 2000, p.
3.
10.
DyckI. (1993)
‘Ethnography: a feminist method?’.The Canadian Geographer, 37(1)
52–57.
11.
EnglandK. (1994)
‘Getting Personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist
research’.The Professional Geographer,
46(1),
80–89.
12.
FeatherstoneM., and BURROWSR. (1995)
Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological
Embodiment.London:
Sage.
13.
FinchJ. (1993).
‘It's Great to have Someone to Talk to’: Ethics and politics
of Interviewing Women, Chapter 14 in
HAMMERSLEYM, (Ed.) Social Research.
Philosophy, Politics and Practice.London:
Sage.
14.
FontanaA., and FREYJ.H. (1994).
‘Interviewing: The Art of Science’. Chapter
22 in DENZINN., and LINCOLNY. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative
Research, London:
Sage.
15.
GaiserT. (1997).
‘Conducting Online Focus Groups: A Methodological
Discussion’.Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 15, No.
2, pp. 135–44.
16.
Gibson-GrahamJ.K. (1994)
‘Stuffed if I know’: reflections on post-modern feminist
social research.Gender, Place and Culture, 1(2)
pp. 205–224.
17.
GlesneC., and PESHKINA. (1992) Becoming
Qualitative Researchers.New York:
Longman.
18.
GrahamS., and MARVINS. (1996).
Telecommunications and the City: Electronic
Spaces, Urban Places.London:
Routledge.
19.
HineC. (2000) Virtual
Ethnography.London:
Sage.
20.
HodkinsonP. (1999). The Goth
Scene as Trans-local Subculture. Unpublished PhD. Thesis. Centre
for Urban and Regional Studies, University of
Birmingham,
UK.
21.
HughesJ. (2000).
Low-Investment Internet- Based Distance Learning Solutions:
Systems and Procedures, TechKnowLogia,
July/August pp. 23–25 <http://www.TechKnowLogia.org>
22.
JonesS.G. (1995)
Cybersociety: Computer- Mediated Communication and
Community.London:
Sage.
23.
JonesS.G. (Ed) (1997)
Virtual Culture: identity and communication in
cybersociety.London:
Sage.
24.
JonesS.G. (Ed) (1998)
Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and
Community.Thousand Oakes, CA:
Sage.
25.
KingS. (1994)
‘Analysis of Electronic Support Groups for Recovering
Addicts’Interpersonal Computing and Technology2(July) pp.
47–56.
26.
KitchinR. (1998)
‘Towards geographies of cyberspace’.Progress in Human Geography, 22,
3, pp.
385–406.
27.
LampJ.M., and HOWARDP.A. (1999)
‘Guiding Parent's Use of the Internet for Newborn
Education’.Maternal- Child Nursing Journal,
24(1) pp.
33–36.
28.
LeeD. (1997)
Interviewing Men: Vulnerabilities and
Dilemmas, Women's Studies International
Forum, Vol. 20, No. 4 pp.
553–564.
29.
LoaderB. (Ed.) (1997) The
Governance of Cyberspace.London:
Routledge.
30.
MadgeC. (1994). The
ethics of research in the ‘Third World’. In
ROBSONE., and WILLISK. (eds.) DARG Monograph No. 8:
Postgraduate Fieldwork in Developing Areas (Developing Areas Research Group
of the Institute of British Geographers) pp.
91–102.
31.
MannC., and STEWARTF. (1999). Internet
Methodologies and Qualitative Research, Unpublished conference
paper, BSA,
Glasgow, April 1999.
32.
MannC., and STEWARTF. (2000) Internet
Communication and Qualitative Research, New
Technologies and Social Research Series. London:
Sage Publications.
33.
MccrackenG. (1998). The
Long Interview, Qualitative Research
Methods, Volume 13. Newbury
Park: Sage
Publications.
34.
McdowellL. (1992)
‘Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in
human geography’.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,
16(4), pp.
400–419.
35.
MichaelsonK.L. (1996).
‘Information, Community, and Access’.Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 14, No.
1, Spring 1996, pp.
57–59.
36.
MillerT. (1998)
Shifting Layers of Professional, Lay and Personal Narratives:
Longitudinal Childbirth Research. Chapter 4 in
RIBBENSJ., and EDWARDSR. (eds) Feminist Dilemmas in
Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives,
London:
Sage.
MoranC., HOLTV., and MARTIND. (1997)
‘What do women want to know after
childbirth?’Birth, 24(1) pp.
27–34.
39.
MorganD.L. (1988).
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research.Sage University Paper Series on Qualitative Research Methods Series
16.Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage.
40.
MoserC.A., and KALTONG. (1971) Survey
Methods in Social Investigation.Aldershot:
Gower.
NguyenD.T., and
ALEXANDERJ. (1996). The
Coming of Cyberspacetime and the End of Polity. Chapter 6 in
ShieldsR., (Ed.) Cultures of Internet:
Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies.London:
Sage.
44.
OakleyA. (1981)
‘Interviewing Women: a contradiction in terms’. Chapter
2 In ROBERTSH. (Ed) Doing Feminist
Research.London:
Routledge.
45.
O'ConnorH., and MADGEC. (forthcoming) Using the
Internet as a Medium for Research, Working Paper,
Centre for Labour Market Studies, University of
Leicester.
46.
O'LEARR.M. (1996).
‘Using electronic mail (e-mail) surveys for geographic
research: lessons from a survey of Russian
environmentalists’, Professional
Geographer, 48(2) pp.
209–217.
47.
PaccagnellaL. (1997)
‘Getting the Seat of your Pants Dirty: Strategies for
Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities’.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication3(1) June 1997 <http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html>
48.
PosterM. (1995).
Postmodern Virtualities, in
FETHERSTONEM., and BURROWSR. (Eds.)
Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological
Embodiment, London:
Sage.
49.
RheingoldH. (1994) The Virtual
Community: Finding Connection in a Computerised World.London: Secker and
Warburg.
50.
RibbensJ. (1989)
Interviewing - An ‘Unnatural Situation’?Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 12,
No. 6, pp.
579–592.
51.
RiessmanC.K. (1991)
When Gender is Not Enough: Women Interviewing Women. Chapter
11 in LORBERJ., and FARRELLS.A. (eds) The Social Construction
of Gender, Newbury Park:
Sage.
52.
RippenH.E. (1997) White
paper: Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the
Internet. Available at: <http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/docs/criteria.html>. Accessed
March 18 1998.
53.
RobsonC. (1993) Real World
Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and
Practicioner-Researchers.Oxford:
Blackwell.
54.
RodwayA. (Ed) (1997) Bounty
Infant Health and Feeding Guide. Diss,
Norfolk: Bounty Publications
Ltd.
55.
SelwynN, and ROBSONK. (1998).
‘Using email as a research tool’.Social Research Update, Issue 21,
University of Surrey. Available at:
<http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU21.html>
56.
SharfB. (1997).
‘Communicating Breast Cancer Online: Support and Empowerment
on the Internet’.Women and Health, Vol. 26(1)
pp. 65–84.
57.
SilkeR., BRUCEJ., and MAFFULLIN. (1998)
‘Accessing the Internet for patient information about
orthopedics’.Journal of the American Medical Association,
280, p. 1309.
SmithS. (1998)
Uncovering Key Aspects of Experience: The Use of In-depth
Interviews in a Study of Women Returners to Education. Chapter
4 in STINA LYONE., and BUSFIELDJ. (eds) Methodological
Imaginations.London: Macmillian
Press.
61.
SpenderD. (1995).
Nattering on the Net.Women, Power and Cyberspace.Melbourne: Spinifex
Press.
62.
wardk.j. (1999).
‘The Cyber-Ethnographic (Re)Construction of Two Feminist
Online Communities’.Sociological Research Online, Vol. 4 no.
1 <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/1/ward.html>
63.
WellmanB, and GULIAM. (1999).
Virtual Communities as Communities: Net surfers don't ride
alone. Chapter 7 in SMITHM.A., and KOLLOCKP., (Eds.) Communities in
Cyberspace, London:
Routledge.
64.
WilliamsC. (1999).
‘Question: Who killed off Dr. Spock? Answer: The
Net.’Guardian, 13 January 1999 pp.
8–9.
